Economic impact analysis of a minimally invasive temperature-controlled radiofrequency device versus nasal surgery for the treatment of nasal airway obstruction in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the economic impact of a minimally invasive temperature-controlled radiofrequency (TCRF) device for treating nasal airway obstruction (NAO). METHODS: A budget impact model was developed for two scenarios: a reference scenario of functional rhinoplasty surgery with concomitant septoplasty and inferior turbinate reduction (ITR) performed in the hospital outpatient department where TCRF is not an available treatment option and a new scenario consisting of in-office TCRF treatment of the nasal valve and ITR. A payor perspective was adopted with a hypothetical population plan size of one million members. Costs were estimated over a time horizon of 4 years. The eligible population included patients with severe/extreme NAO and nasal valve collapse (NVC) as the primary cause or significant contributor. Data inputs were sourced from targeted literature reviews. Uncertainty within the model structure and input parameters was assessed using one-way sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: The introduction of a TCRF device resulted in population-level cost savings of $20,015,123 and per-responder average cost savings of $3531 through a 4-year time horizon due to lower procedure costs and complication rates of the device relative to the surgical comparator. Results were robust when varying parameter values in sensitivity analyses, with cost savings being most sensitive to the prevalence of NAO and estimated response rates to functional rhinoplasty and TCRF. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with severe/extreme NAO, with NVC as the primary or major contributor, introducing TCRF with ITR as a treatment option demonstrates the potential for significant cost savings over functional rhinoplasty with septoplasty and ITR.

Nasal valve dysfunction is a common cause of nasal airway obstruction (NAO) that has a significant impact on heath and quality of life for affected individuals. Previously, patients were offered temporary measures or a type of surgery called functional rhinoplasty which is a highly complex surgery that can be costly, requires recovery time, and in rare cases, not be successful. Recently, a new minimally invasive treatment alternative for NAO called temperature-controlled radiofrequency (TCRF) that may be performed in a surgery center or a doctor's office has become available. This paper provides the results of budget impact analysis performed to assess whether adding the TCRF procedure in place of surgery as a choice for patients with NAO will result in cost savings to an insurance payer with 1 million covered individuals in the United States over a period of 4 years. Results show that TCRF may result in an average of 9,416 fewer rhinoplasty surgeries, provide an average 4-year cost-savings of $3,531 for every patient that responds to TCRF treatment, and a savings of $20,015,123 over 4 years for the insurance provider. These potential cost savings over 4 years would likely be due to reduced procedure costs and complication rates compared to surgery.

Bridging and Validation of the Specific Graves Ophthalmopathy Quality of Life Questionnaire With Health State Utility Values.

OBJECTIVE: In thyroid eye disease (TED), inflammation and expansion of orbital muscle and periorbital fat result in diplopia and proptosis, severely impacting patient quality of life (QOL). The reported health state utility (HSU) scores, which are QOL measures, allow quantification of TED impact and improvement with therapies; however, no current QOL instrument has been validated with HSU scores for TED. Here, we used the disease-specific Graves Ophthalmopathy Quality of Life (GO-QOL) questionnaire and HSU scores to validate QOL impact. METHODS: The GO-QOL scores from patients in 2 randomized, masked, placebo-controlled teprotumumab trials (N=171) were compared with 6 HSU values based on severity of proptosis/diplopia in those studies. Patient GO-QOL and HSU scores were compared at baseline and after 6-month treatment via regression analyses. GO-QOL and HSU scores were correlated for validation and quantification of QOL impact by severity state and to estimate quality-adjusted life year improvement. RESULTS: GO-QOL scores were correlated with TED severity, indicating that worse severity was associated with lower (worse) GO-QOL scores. Less severe health states were represented by higher (better) GO-QOL scores. Importantly, GO-QOL scores were positively correlated with utility scores of the 6 health states, allowing for conversion of the GO-QOL scores to utility scores. A positive (improved) 0.013 utility change was found for each 1-point (positive) improvement in GO-QOL score produced by teprotumumab versus placebo. CONCLUSION: Patients with moderate-to-severe active TED health states demonstrate increasing TED severity associated with declining utility values and worsening GO-QOL scores. These results indicate that the GO-QOL scores can be used to bridge to the HSU scores for benefit quantification.