Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Adv Skin Wound Care ; 32(11): 490-501, 2019 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31625965

ABSTRACT

GENERAL PURPOSE: To provide information on a 60-second General Foot Screen to assist in the prevention and/or identification and management of common foot problems. TARGET AUDIENCE: This continuing education activity is intended for physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and nurses with an interest in skin and wound care. LEARNING OBJECTIVES/OUTCOMES: After participating in this educational activity, the participant should be better able to:1. Use the 60-second General Foot Screen to assist healthcare professionals in the recognition of common foot problems.2. Identify risk factors, causes, and treatment of selected foot problems. ABSTRACT: Foot health is important to overall patient health. Early diagnosis and treatment of diabetes, neuropathy, fungal foot infections, foot deformity, and vascular disease/lower leg edema can improve patient quality of life. One way to achieve this is effective screening. To this end, researchers piloted a validated 10-item screening tool to assess foot health on 120 patients; 74.17% had at least one positive abnormality, demonstrating the critical importance of these early findings. Only 25.83% of individuals had completely low-risk feet. This easy-to-use tool can assist healthcare professionals in the recognition and treatment of common foot problems. The article also outlines the early signs of disease by screening item and provides a guide to treatment to enable effective prevention and quality care.


Subject(s)
Diabetic Foot/diagnosis , Diabetic Foot/therapy , Mass Screening/standards , Wound Healing/physiology , Early Diagnosis , Education, Medical, Continuing , Female , Foot Diseases/diagnosis , Foot Diseases/therapy , Humans , Male , Pilot Projects , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Reproducibility of Results , Time Factors
2.
Adv Skin Wound Care ; 32(2): 58-69, 2019 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30653184

ABSTRACT

GENERAL PURPOSE: To provide information about the diagnosis and management of cutaneous psoriasis. TARGET AUDIENCE: This continuing education activity is intended for physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and nurses with an interest in skin and wound care. LEARNING OBJECTIVES/OUTCOMES: After completing this continuing education activity, the provider should be better able to: ABSTRACT: Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory disease that is characterized by plaque, inverse, guttate, pustular, and erythrodermic variants. This review focuses on the epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of cutaneous psoriasis. Other related topics discussed include peristomal psoriasis, the Koebner phenomenon, and the relationship between biologic therapy and wound complications.


Subject(s)
Nurse Practitioners/standards , Psoriasis/diagnosis , Psoriasis/therapy , Skin Care/nursing , Humans , Psoriasis/nursing
3.
SAGE Open Med Case Rep ; 6: 2050313X18804076, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30345057

ABSTRACT

Although rare, erythema induratum is the most common entity presenting as lobular panniculitis with vasculitis. It is usually caused by a hypersensitivity reaction to Mycobacterium tuberculosis, although other aetiologies have been reported. We present a case of a 73-year-old male with multiple recurring tender erythematous nodules on the backs of both calves and shins. Prior to arrival in our clinic, the patient underwent a 9-month course of isoniazid with no improvement and subsequently received a diagnosis of idiopathic erythema induratum. We performed an interferon-gamma release assay QuantiFERON-TB Gold which was positive for M. tuberculosis infection. The patient was successfully treated with ethambutol 1.6 g for 1 month; pyrazinamide 2 g for 2 months; and isoniazid 300 mg, vitamin B6 25 mg, and rifampin 600 mg for 6 months. This case highlights the utility of using interferon-gamma release assay QuantiFERON-TB Gold and a multidrug regiment over isoniazid in erythema induratum.

4.
Adv Skin Wound Care ; 31(4): 154-162, 2018 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29561340

ABSTRACT

GENERAL PURPOSE: The purpose of this learning activity is to provide information about the Healthy Foot Screen, a new tool for assessment of common foot abnormalities. TARGET AUDIENCE: This continuing education activity is intended for physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and nurses with an interest in skin and wound care. LEARNING OBJECTIVES/OUTCOMES: After completing this continuing education activity, you should be able to:1. Recognize prevalence, causes, risk factors, signs, and types of common foot problems.2. Identify the results of this study about the new foot screening tool and its implications in primary care. ABSTRACT: Foot health is a key component of general health and well-being. Nevertheless, feet are often overlooked by healthcare providers and patients. Common foot problems include infections or inflammatory conditions, abnormal nail disorders (eg, onychomycosis), structural bony abnormalities, circulation disorders, and other conditions. The development of an easy-to-use, rapid, clinical tool to assess foot health can facilitate primary care provider recognition and treatment of common foot problems. This study ascertained interrater item reliability and validity from the preliminary version of one such tool called the Healthy Foot Screen.A total of 18 patients from a community dermatology clinic were individually screened by 11 interprofessional healthcare assessors using the preliminary tool. The assessors included a dermatologist/internist, family physicians, nurses, and podiatrists. The initial draft of the Healthy Foot Screen was created through an extensive literature review, complemented by the clinical judgment of the study team. Cronbach α was calculated for each item to determine interrater reliability. A minimum value of 0.6 was set for an item to be included in the final tool. Where applicable, scores for each item on the screen were calculated for right and left lower limbs and then averaged. Assessors were asked to complete a short survey.Interrater reliability scores for items on the screen were as follows: diabetes and smoking, 1.0; neuropathy, 0.988; palpable foot pulse, 0.916; abnormal fourth to fifth toe web space, 0.905; previous ulcer/amputation, 0.869; pitting edema, 0.872; bony abnormality, 0.804; dry bottom of foot, 0.799; toenail infection, 0.793; other spots/lesions,0.688; and red areas/blisters/pustules, 0.659. Generally, assessors found the tool easy to use, although some areas for improvement were noted.The Healthy Foot Screen can facilitate primary care provider diagnosis and treatment of common foot problems.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence/standards , Diabetic Foot/diagnosis , Inservice Training/standards , Peripheral Vascular Diseases/diagnosis , Early Diagnosis , Female , Humans , Male , Psychometrics , Reproducibility of Results
5.
Adv Skin Wound Care ; 30(10): 438-450, 2017 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28914678

ABSTRACT

GENERAL PURPOSE: To provide information on the use of topical antimicrobial agents for the treatment of chronic wounds. TARGET AUDIENCE: This continuing education activity is intended for physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and nurses with an interest in skin and wound care. LEARNING OBJECTIVES/OUTCOMES: After participating in this educational activity, the participant should be better able to:1. Examine features of wounds and wound healing as well as the purpose of specific antimicrobial agents.2. Identify potential therapeutic and adverse effects of specific topical antimicrobial agents for the treatment of chronic wounds. ABSTRACT: Bacteria can delay or prevent healing in the surface compartment of a chronic wound or invade the deep and surrounding structures. This article focuses on the superficial compartment and the appropriate use of topical antimicrobial therapies. The authors have reviewed the published evidence for the last 5 years (2012-2017) and extrapolated findings to clinical practice with critical appraisal and synthesis of the recent literature with expert opinion, patient-centered concerns, and healthcare systems perspectives. Summary evidence tables for commonly used topical antimicrobials are included.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents, Local/therapeutic use , Wound Healing/drug effects , Wound Infection/drug therapy , Wound Infection/microbiology , Administration, Topical , Chronic Disease , Female , Humans , Male , Occlusive Dressings , Risk Factors , Surgical Wound Infection/diagnosis , Surgical Wound Infection/drug therapy , Treatment Outcome , Wound Healing/physiology , Wound Infection/diagnosis , Wounds and Injuries/diagnosis , Wounds and Injuries/drug therapy
6.
BMC Pediatr ; 16(1): 192, 2016 11 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27887580

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Approximately 13% of Canadian mothers report difficulty accessing health care for their infants, yet little is known about the factors associated with difficulty. Therefore, we examined factors associated with difficulty accessing non-routine health care for Canadian infants, from birth to 14 months of age, as reported by their mothers. METHODS: Data was drawn from the Maternity Experiences Survey (MES), a cross-sectional, nationally representative survey of mothers who gave birth between November 2005 and May 2006, aged 15 years or older, and lived with their infants at the time of survey administration. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine factors associated with reporting difficulty, with difficulty defined as a mother reporting it being somewhat or very difficult to access a health care provider. RESULTS: Analysis of 2832 mothers who reported needing to access a health care provider for their infant for a non-routine visit found that 13% reported difficulty accessing a provider. Factors associated with reporting difficulty were: residing in Quebec (aOR 1.89, 95% CI: 1.31-2.73), being an immigrant (aOR 1.58, 95% CI: 1.10-2.27), mistimed pregnancy (aOR 1.44, 95% CI: 1.05-1.98), low level of social support (aOR 1.69, 95% CI: 1.05-2.73), good health (aOR 1.88, 95% CI: 1.43-2.47), postpartum depression symptoms (aOR 1.55, 95% CI: 1.02-2.37) and a self-reported 'too-short' postpartum hospital stay (aOR 1.69, 95% CI: 1.21-2.35). Additionally, accessing care for an infant with a birth weight of 2500 g or more (aOR 2.43, 95% CI: 1.02-5.82), was associated with reporting difficulty. Household income, mothers' level of education, marital status, Aboriginal ethnicity, and size of community of residence were not associated with difficulty accessing care. CONCLUSIONS: Ease of health care access for Canadian infants is not equal, suggesting that efforts to improve access should be tailored to groups facing increased difficulties.


Subject(s)
Child Health Services/supply & distribution , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical data , Mothers , Adolescent , Adult , Canada , Child Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Logistic Models , Male , Multivariate Analysis , Self Report , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...