A Systematic Review of Risk Factors for Development, Recurrence, and Progression of Vulvar Intraepithelial Neoplasia.

OBJECTIVE: Vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN) is a premalignant condition with high recurrence rates despite treatment. Vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia develops through separate etiologic pathways relative to the presence or absence of human papillomavirus (HPV) and TP53 mutations. This systematic review was conducted (1) to identify historical risk factors for the development, recurrence, and progression of VIN and (2) to critique these risk factors in the context of advances made in the stratification of VIN based on HPV or TP53 status. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic search was performed on MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Database, PsychInfo, and CINAHL from inception to July 5, 2021. Three gynecologic oncologists independently evaluated the eligibility of studies based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria, abstracted data, and then analyzed the relevant data. RESULTS: A total of 1,969 studies (involving 6,983 patients) were identified. Twenty-nine studies met inclusion criteria. The quality of evidence was low; primarily level 2b (Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine). Risk factors associated with the development of VIN include: smoking and coexisting vulvar dermatoses. Risk factors associated with recurrence include: smoking, multifocal disease, and positive surgical margins. Recent studies identified the presence of differentiated VIN/TP53 mutation as the most significant risk factor for both VIN recurrence and malignant progression. CONCLUSIONS: The current body of evidence consists primarily of small retrospective observational studies. Well-designed retrospective case-control series and/or prospective observational studies are urgently needed. Ideally, future studies will collect standardized data regarding associated risk factors and stratify women with VIN based on HPV and TP53 status.

Adjuvant Treatment of Early Ovarian Clear Cell Carcinoma: A Population-Based Study of Whole Abdominal Versus Pelvic Nodal Radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant treatment in early ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) is not yet standardized. The objective of this population-based study was to compare the outcome of patients with early OCCC treated with adjuvant chemotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy (chemoRT) and evaluate the association of adjuvant radiotherapy regimens (whole abdominal radiotherapy [WART] versus pelvic nodal radiotherapy [PRT]) with outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chart review was conducted to identify patients with stage I and II OCCC with complete information on staging. Patients with stage IA, IB, or IC OCCC purely resulting from capsular rupture were excluded because the provincial protocol does not recommend adjuvant treatment. RESULTS: Overall, 403 patients were identified and 343 received adjuvant treatment, of whom 255 had stage IC or II OCCC and 153 were eligible for final analysis. On Cox multivariable regression, receipt of chemoRT (n=90) was associated with an improvement in failure-free survival (FFS) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.57; 95% CI, 0.34-0.94) compared with chemotherapy alone (n=63). Use of chemoRT also resulted in 54% reduction in the cumulative incidence of cancer-specific mortality (subdistribution HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.24-0.89). However, there was no significant difference in the HR for overall survival (OS) between the chemoRT (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.43-1.13) and chemotherapy group. Relative to chemotherapy + WART (chemo-WART), chemotherapy + PRT (chemo-PRT) was not associated with any significant difference in HR for FFS (HR, 1.34; 95% CI, 0.40-4.44) or OS (HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.37-3.46). CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant chemoRT was associated with a lower risk of failure compared with chemotherapy alone. However, there was no difference in OS between the adjuvant chemotherapy and chemoRT regimens. Additionally, no significant difference in terms of FFS or OS was found between the chemo-WART and chemo-PRT groups.

Utility of 18F-FDG-PET/CT imaging in patients with recurrent gynecological malignancies prior to pelvic exenteration.

BACKGROUND: In patients with recurrent gynecologic malignancies isolated to the pelvis, pelvic exenteration is a potential option. 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT), is often used to confirm no evidence of metastatic disease. OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of PET/CT on clinical management of patients with recurrent gynecologic malignancies being considered for pelvic exenteration. METHODS: Patients with recurrent gynecological malignancies who underwent PET/CT imaging between 2011 and 2014 were identified. All were considered for pelvic exenteration and underwent conventional imaging with CT +/- pelvic MRI. Patient anthropometric data, disease sites, histology, stage, treatment received, and treatment plan based on PET/CT findings were extracted. RESULTS: A total of 40 patients met inclusion criteria. In 15 (37.5%) of these patients, results of PET/CT changed the original plan of pelvic exenteration owing to metastatic disease/unresectability (11/15) or no evidence of disease on PET/CT imaging (4/15). Twenty-five (62.5%) patients had their planned surgery after PET/CT with 19 (76%) patients undergoing a completed exenteration procedure. Six (24%) patients with PET/CT indicating isolated pelvic recurrence ultimately had intra-operative findings of extra-pelvic metastasis or nodal disease and therefore the planned surgery was aborted. CONCLUSION: In nearly 40% of patients with recurrent gynecologic malignancies being considered for radical salvage surgery, PET/CT can significantly alter the originally intended treatment and hence may reduce the number of futile surgical procedures.

Cost-effectiveness of sentinel node biopsy and pathological ultrastaging in patients with early-stage cervical cancer.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of radical hysterectomy (RH) and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for the management of early-stage cervical cancer (stage IA2-IB1). METHODS: A simple decision tree model was developed to follow a simulated cohort of patients with early-stage cervical cancer treated with RH and 1 of 3 lymph node assessment strategies: systematic pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND), SLNB using technetium 99 (Tc99) and blue dye, and SLNB using Tc99 only. SLNB using indocyanine green (ICG) was used as an exploratory strategy. Relevant studies were identified to extract the probability data and utility parameters and to estimate quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and absolute life-years (ALYs). Only direct medical costs were modeled, and the time horizon for the study was 5 years. RESULTS: SLNB using Tc99 and blue dye cost $21,089 and yielded 4.54 QALYs and 4.90 ALYs. PLND cost $22,353 and yielded 4.47 QALYs and 4.91 ALYs. SLNB using blue dye and Tc99 was the most cost-effective strategy when ALYs were considered with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $144,531. When QALYs were considered, the SLNB technique using Tc99 and blue dye dominated all other strategies. SLNB using ICG cost $20,624 and yielded 4.90 ALYs and 4.54 QALYs. It was clinically superior to and less expensive than all other strategies when QALYs were the outcome of interest and had an ICER of $221,171 per ALY in comparison with RH plus PLND. CONCLUSIONS: SLNB using Tc99 and blue dye with ultrastaging is considered the most cost-effective strategy with respect to 5-year progression-free survival and morbidity-free survival. Although it was included only as an exploratory strategy in this study, SLNB with ICG has the potential to be the most cost-effective strategy. Cancer 2017;123:1751-1759. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

The effect of adjuvant radiation on survival in early stage clear cell ovarian carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) on survival in patients with stage I and II ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC). METHODS: Data collection and analysis of stage I and II OCCC patients treated at two tertiary centers in Toronto, between 1995 and 2014, was performed. Descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier survival probability estimates were completed. The log-rank test was used to compare survival curves. RESULTS: 163 patients were eligible. 44 (27%) patients were treated with adjuvant RT: 37 of them received adjuvant chemotherapy (CT), and 7 had RT only. In the no-RT group, there were 119 patients: 83 patients received adjuvant CT and 36 had no adjuvant treatment. The 10year progression free survival (PFS) was 65% for patients treated with RT, and 59% no-RT patients. There were a total of 41 (25%) recurrences in the cohort: 12 (27.2%) patients in RT group and 29 (24.3%) in the no-RT group. On multivariable analysis, adjuvant RT was not significantly associated with an increased PFS (0.85 (0.44-1.63) p=0.63) or overall survival (OS) (0.84 (0.39-1.82) p=0.66). In the subset of 59 patients defined as high-risk: stage IC with positive cytology and/or surface involvement and stage II: RT was not found to be associated with a better PFS (HR 1.18 (95% CI: 0.55-2.54) or O S(HR 1.04 (95% CI: 0.40-2.69)). CONCLUSION: Adjuvant RT was not found to be associated with a survival benefit in patients with stage I and II ovarian clear cell carcinoma or in a high risk subset of patients including stage IC cytology positive/surface involvement and stage II patients.