Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Nurs Open ; 10(4): 2319-2328, 2023 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36404294

ABSTRACT

AIM: The aim of the study was to test the psychometric properties of the Facilitative Student-Patient Relationship (FSPR) Scale in clinical practicum in hospital settings within six European countries. DESIGN: A multi-country, cross-sectional survey design was applied. METHODS: A convenience sample of graduating nursing students (N = 1,796) completed the FSPR Scale. Psychometric testing was carried out through explorative factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. RESULTS: Both validity and reliability of the scale were confirmed. The explorative factor analysis yielded a two-factor construct explaining 47.7% of the total variance, identifying two sub-scales: caring relationship and learning relationship. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the two-factor structure. The Cronbach alpha coefficients (0.8-0.9) indicated acceptable reliability of the scale.


Subject(s)
Students, Nursing , Humans , Psychometrics , Cross-Sectional Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem ; 30: e3581, 2022.
Article in Portuguese, English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35830124

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: this study aimed at evaluating the perceptions of Nursing students from public universities in three European Union countries on mental health and clinical learning environments, a topic that has been rarely investigated in the literature. METHOD: data collection took place using a demographic data form, the Clinical Learning Environment, Supervision and Nurse Teacher Scale, and the Mental Health Continuum Short Form. A total of 571 participants from Turkey, Lithuania and Portugal were included in the study. RESULTS: there was a significant difference among the three groups regarding clinical learning environment and mental health status (p<.001). Supervision was the most valued element. The Portuguese students presented the highest mean in the Mental Health Continuum Short Form and Clinical Learning Environment, Supervision and Nurse Teacher Scale scores (p<.001). Age, gender and mental health were effective in the Clinical Learning Environment, Supervision and Nurse Teacher Scale scores. CONCLUSION: the results indicated that the Mental Health Continuum Short Form and Clinical Learning Environment, Supervision and Nurse Teacher Scale scores obtained by the Portuguese Nursing students were higher. It was also revealed that the students' perceptions on the clinical learning environment were affected by age and gender, and that their perceptions on mental health were influenced by the Clinical Learning Environment, Supervision and Nurse Teacher scale scores.


Subject(s)
Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate , Students, Nursing , Faculty, Nursing , Humans , Mental Health , Students, Nursing/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
Nurse Educ Pract ; 59: 103287, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35066252

ABSTRACT

AIM: The aim of this study was to analyse the patients' role in clinical education in terms of facilitative student-patient relationship in Finland, Germany, Iceland, Ireland, Lithuania and Spain and factors promoting a more facilitative relationship in clinical education. BACKGROUND: Nursing students' bedside learning is reliant on patients and the establishment of a person-centred approach develops from the relationships with patients. DESIGN: A multi-country, cross-sectional design was implemented. METHODS: Survey data were collected from graduating nursing students and patients between May 2018 and March 2019. The survey consisted of a 13-item facilitative sub-scale of the Student-Patient Relationship Scale as the main outcome measure, which was identical for both populations. In addition, background factors were surveyed with single questions and other scales. Associations between facilitative relationship and background factors were studied with linear models. RESULTS: Altogether, 1796 students and 1327 patients answered the survey. Overall, both students and patients regarded their relationship as facilitative, but students' (median 4.23, 95% confidence interval 4.15-4.23) evaluations were higher than patients' (median 3.75, 95% confidence interval 3.69-3.77). The students' and patients' evaluations differed from each other significantly in all other countries except in Ireland and Lithuania. Corresponding associations for both populations were found in terms of the country and students' cultural confidence. CONCLUSIONS: Results signal favourable grounds for students' bedside learning and patient participation in clinical education with the potential to foster a person-centred approach.


Subject(s)
Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate , Students, Nursing , Cross-Sectional Studies , Finland , Humans , Surveys and Questionnaires
4.
J Clin Nurs ; 31(5-6): 548-558, 2022 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34101280

ABSTRACT

AIM: The aim of this study is to evaluate the medication calculation skills of graduating nursing students in six European countries and analyse the associated factors. BACKGROUND: Medication calculation skills are fundamental to medication safety, which is a substantial part of patient safety. Previous studies have raised concerns about the medication calculation skills of nurses and nursing students. DESIGN: As part of a broader research project, this study applies a multinational cross-sectional survey design with three populations: graduating nursing students, nurse managers and patients. METHODS: The students performed two calculations (tablet and fluid) testing medication calculation skills requiring different levels of conceptual understanding and arithmetic. The managers and patients answered one question about the students' medication kills. In total, 1,796 students, 538 managers and 1,327 patients participated the study. The data were analysed statistically. The STROBE guideline for cross-sectional studies was applied. RESULTS: Almost all (99%) of the students performed the tablet calculation correctly, and the majority (71%) answered the fluid calculation correctly. Older age, a previous degree in health care and satisfaction with their current degree programme was positively associated with correct fluid calculations. The patients evaluated the students' medication skills higher than the nurse managers did and the evaluations were not systematically aligned with the calculation skills tested. CONCLUSIONS: Nursing students have the skills to perform simple medication calculations, but a significant number of students have difficulties with calculations involving multiple operations and a higher level of conceptual understanding. Due to the variation in students' medication calculation skills and the unalignment between the managers' and patients' evaluations and the calculation tests, further research is needed. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Graduating nursing students enter clinical field as qualified professionals, but there is still room for improvement in their medication calculation skills. This calls for attention in the fields of clinical nursing, education and research.


Subject(s)
Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate , Students, Nursing , Aged , Clinical Competence , Cross-Sectional Studies , Drug Dosage Calculations , Educational Measurement , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...