ABSTRACT
Quality-of-life (QoL) is now recognized as a principal outcome marker for long-term care. However, QoL is difficult to define and measure, especially in residents with dementia. Providers of long-term care services (n = 182) were asked to rate the importance of 19 psychosocial quality-of-life elements for hypothetical residents with physical impairment and for residents with cognitive impairment. Respondents also were asked to rate their ability to influence these elements for each type of resident. Respondents rated the importance of 18 of the 19 elements and their ability to influence 17 of 19 elements lower for residents with cognitive impairment. Of the five types of respondents, certified nursing assistants (CNAs) rated their ability to influence these QoL elements the highest for both types of residents; physicians' ratings were the lowest. Pain management was given high ratings for both importance and ability to influence for both resident types; the lowest ratings were given for elements that pertained to residents' understanding. A strong correlation between ratings for importance and ability to influence was observed. Additional research is needed on the psychosocial aspects of long-term care residents' QoL, especially those with cognitive impairment.
Subject(s)
Cognition Disorders/psychology , Health Personnel/psychology , Long-Term Care/psychology , Quality of Life/psychology , Adult , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Long-Term Care/methods , Long-Term Care/statistics & numerical data , Middle AgedABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Personal assistance care is a Medicaid benefit in New York, but few data are available on its prevalence and contribution to home care. We examined these issues in a New York City sample by assessing older adults' reports of weekly home care hours and Medicaid billing records. DESIGN AND METHODS: With help from New York City's Human Resources Administration, we identified all respondents in an ongoing population-based survey of Medicare enrollees who were receiving Medicaid-reimbursed personal assistance care in 1996. RESULTS: Of respondents in the sample, 10.3% (185 of 1,902 alive through 1996) had Medicaid claims for personal assistance care. The mean was 46.1 hr/week for reported hours and 40.1 hr/week for administrative claims. Accuracy of reported hours was evident in a high correlation (r =.91; p <.001) between respondent reports and authorized claims, and a consistently high and mostly constant ratio of billed to reported hours across all categories of activities of daily living disability. IMPLICATIONS: In this urban, low income, and mostly minority sample, older adults' reports of weekly formal care hours were valid when matched against administrative records. Respondent reports of formal care hours were valid even in complex care situations.