ABSTRACT
The aim of the study was to investigate inhibitory effects of the receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) inhibitor SU11248 against CSF-1R and osteoclast (OC) formation. We developed an in vivo model of breast cancer metastasis to evaluate efficacy of SU11248 against tumor growth and tumor-induced osteolysis in bone. The in vitro effects of SU11248 on CSF-1R phosphorylation, OC formation and function were evaluated. Effects on 435/HAL-Luc tumor growth in bone were monitored by in vivo bioluminescence imaging (BLI), and inhibition of osteolysis was evaluated by measurement of serum pyridinoline (PYD) concentration and histology. Phosphorylation of the receptor for M-CSF (CSF-1R) expressed by NIH3T3 cells was inhibited by SU11248 with an IC50 of 50-100 nM, consistent with CSF-1R belonging to the class III split kinase domain RTK family. The early M-CSF-dependent phase of in vitro murine OC development and function were inhibited by SU11248 at 10-100 nM. In vivo inhibition of osteolysis was confirmed by significant lowering of serum PYD levels following SU11248 treatment of tumor-bearing mice (P = 0.047). Using BLI, SU11248 treatment at 40 mg/kg/day for 21 days showed 64% inhibition of tumor growth in bone (P = 0.006), and at 80 mg/kg/day showed 89% inhibition (P = 0.001). Collectively, these data suggest that SU11248 may be an effective and tolerated therapy to inhibit growth of breast cancer bone metastases, with the additional advantage of inhibiting tumor-associated osteolysis.
Subject(s)
Bone Neoplasms/pathology , Bone Neoplasms/physiopathology , Indoles/pharmacology , Osteolysis , Pyrroles/pharmacology , Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases/antagonists & inhibitors , Receptor, Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor/metabolism , Animals , Bone Neoplasms/secondary , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Cell Adhesion , Mice , Mice, Nude , Neoplasm Transplantation , Osteoclasts , Phosphorylation , Sunitinib , Tumor Cells, CulturedABSTRACT
Thrombocytopenic episodes occurring in 18,845 patients treated with the GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors xemilofiban and orbofiban ("fibans") were analyzed by a blinded review panel and 73 patients were classified as having "possible fiban-induced thrombocytopenia". When the treatment codes were broken, a significant association between drug exposure and assignment to this group was found (p <0.001). Twenty-eight (82%) of 34 archived serum samples from these patients contained fiban-dependent antibodies specific for GPIIb/IIIa, but no such antibodies were found in 61 drug treated patients not classified as having "possible fiban-induced thrombocytopenia" (p <0.001). We conclude that fiban-dependent antibodies were the major cause of acute, severe thrombocytopenia in patients judged on the basis of clinical findings to have thrombocytopenia "possibly-induced" by xemilofiban and orbofiban. Measurement of drug-dependent antibodies may be helpful in determining the basis for acute thrombocytopenia in fiban-treated patients and possibly for identification of patients at risk to develop thrombocytopenia.
