Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Chemosphere ; 161: 300-307, 2016 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27441989

ABSTRACT

The potential for biotransformation of weathered hydrocarbon residues in soils collected from two commercial oil refinery sites (Soil A and B) was studied in microcosm experiments. Soil A has previously been subjected to on-site bioremediation and it was believed that no further degradation was possible while soil B has not been subjected to any treatment. A number of amendment strategies including bioaugmentation with hydrocarbon degrader, biostimulation with nutrients and soil grinding, were applied to the microcosms as putative biodegradation improvement strategies. The hydrocarbon concentrations in each amendment group were monitored throughout 112 days incubation. Microcosms treated with biostimulation (BS) and biostimulation/bioaugmentation (BS + BA) showed the most significant reductions in the aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbon fractions. However, soil grinding was shown to reduce the effectiveness of a nutrient treatment on the extent of biotransformation by up to 25% and 20% for the aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbon fractions, respectively. This is likely due to the disruption to the indigenous microbial community in the soil caused by grinding. Further, ecotoxicological responses (mustard seed germination and Microtox assays) showed that a reduction of total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) concentration in soil was not directly correlable to reduction in toxicity; thus monitoring TPH alone is not sufficient for assessing the environmental risk of a contaminated site after remediation.


Subject(s)
Hydrocarbons/analysis , Microbial Consortia , Petroleum Pollution/analysis , Petroleum/analysis , Soil Microbiology , Soil Pollutants/analysis , Ammonia/analysis , Biodegradation, Environmental , Ecotoxicology , Hydrocarbons/metabolism , Microbial Consortia/drug effects , Nitrates/analysis , Petroleum/metabolism , Phosphates/analysis , Soil/chemistry , Weather
2.
Anal Chem ; 80(18): 7090-6, 2008 Sep 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18700781

ABSTRACT

A sequential ultrasonic extraction method for contaminated soils with weathered hydrocarbons is presented. The method covers the determination of total petroleum hydrocarbons between nC 8 and nC 40, and subranges of hydrocarbons including diesel range organic compounds, kerosene range organic compounds, and mineral oil range organic compounds in soils. Further modifications to the carbon banding may be made as requested for risk assessment. These include a series of ranges known as Texas banding (from the Texas Risk Reduction Program) as well as separation of the aliphatic and aromatic fractions. The method can be routinely used for measuring hydrocarbons down to 10 mg kg (-1) in soil. Lower limits can be achieved by employing a suitable solvent concentration step following extraction; however, this would result in increased cycle time. Detection limits may vary for individual carbon ranges calculated on the percentage of the full range they cover. With an extraction efficiency and recovery between >or=95 and 99%, this method can be easily positioned as a good alternative to Soxhlet extraction and shows a good potential for implementation as a standard method potentially providing further insight to the contaminated land sector.


Subject(s)
Chemical Fractionation/methods , Hydrocarbons/analysis , Hydrocarbons/isolation & purification , Soil Pollutants/analysis , Soil Pollutants/isolation & purification , Hydrocarbons, Aromatic/analysis , Hydrocarbons, Aromatic/isolation & purification , Petroleum/analysis , Risk , Sensitivity and Specificity , Solvents/chemistry , Ultrasonics , United Kingdom
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...