Case report: gastrointestinal hemorrhage caused by a pancreas transplant arteriovenous fistula with large psuedoanuerysm 9 years after transplantation.

Reported cases of arteriovenous fistulae in transplant recipients are uncommon. We present a case of an arteriovenous fistula associated with a large pseudoaneurysm in the root of the small bowel mesentery of a pancreas transplant. Uniquely, in our case, the arteriovenous fistula presented with an episode of gastrointestinal (GI) hemorrhage 9 years postoperatively. Radiographic imaging including coronal computed tomography angiogram and conventional angiogram demonstrated an arteriovenous fistula in the patient's pancreas transplant between the distal superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and superior mesenteric vein (SMV) with 6 cm aneurysmal dilatation. The tremendous flow in the fistula in the root of the graft small intestine mesentery led to graft duodenal mucosal congestion and lower GI hemorrhage. After successful embolization of the SMA-SMV fistula and pseudoaneurysm using interventional radiographic techniques, the arteriovenous fistula remained thrombosed. The patient had no further episodes of GI bleeding and her endoscopic evaluation was otherwise negative. The presence of arteriovenous fistulae and pseudoaneurysms in pancreas transplant recipients is uncommon, but has been previously documented. This case is further distinguished from previous reports by the notable 9-year interval between transplantation and the onset of hemorrhage. Historically, symptomatic vascular malformations have been associated with significant patient morbidity and mortality. Successful patient management involves timely and accurate diagnosis and intervention.

Potential differences in kidney allograft outcomes between ethnicities when converting to sirolimus base immunosuppression.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether ethnicity impacts graft outcomes in kidney transplant patients converted to sirolimus (SRL) and maintained on either calcineurin inhibitors (CI) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) with steroids. METHODS: This study analyzed kidney transplants converted to SRL and transplanted between July 1991 and April 2007. Patients were divided into 4 groups: group 1: African-Americans converted to SRL + CI; group 2: non-African-Americans converted to SRL + CI; group 3: African-Americans converted to SRL + MMF; group 4: non-African-Americans converted to SRL + MMF. RESULTS: A total of 242 patients was included. Demographics, baseline immunosuppression, and reason for SRL conversion were similar among groups. Patients converted to SRL + CI regimens had significantly higher rates of acute rejection before SRL conversion, but equal rates after conversion. Development of proteinuria was similar across groups. African-American patients converted to SRL + MMF tended to have poorer outcomes compared with African-American patients converted to SRL + CI. Non-African-American patients converted to SRL + MMF tended to have better graft outcomes compared with non-African-American patients converted to SRL + CI. CONCLUSIONS: African-Americans converted to SRL may benefit from continued CI, whereas non-African-Americans converted to SRL seem to have better outcomes with MMF. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

Long-term efficacy of induction therapy with anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibodies or thymoglobulin compared with no induction therapy in renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Although the utility of antibody induction therapy has been demonstrated in clinical trials, the ideal regimen to use based on patient risk factors has not been fully elucidated. The objectives of this study were to determine the impact of either anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibodies (IL-2RA) or thymoglobulin induction therapies versus no induction therapy on acute rejection rates and on 3-year graft survival rates. METHODS: This retrospective analysis compared 3 patient groups-those who did not receive induction, those who received IL-2RA induction, and those who received thymoglobulin induction. RESULTS: Three hundred eleven patients were included in this study. Patients were well matched for demographic and immunologic characteristics in the noninduced and IL-2RA induction therapy groups; the thymoglobulin induction group included significantly higher risk patients. The acute rejection rates were significantly lower in the IL-2RA and thymoglobulin groups when compared with the no induction therapy group (28% vs 15% vs 41%, respectively; P = .001), which was confirmed with multivariate analysis. The 3-year graft loss rates (no induction 21% vs IL2-RA induction 19% vs thymoglobulin induction 25%; P > .50) and creatinine concentrations (no induction 1.8 +/- 0.7, IL-2RA induction 2.0 +/- 1.0, and thymoglobulin induction 1.9 +/- 1.2; P = .47) were similar between all groups. CONCLUSION: The use of induction therapy significantly reduces the incidence of acute rejection. The use of thymoglobulin induction equalizes 3-year graft survival rates in high-risk patients to those seen in low-risk patients receiving either no induction or IL-2RA induction.