Overall and cause-specific mortality in transplant recipients with a pretransplantation cancer history.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear to what extent cancer history affects posttransplantation mortality in solid organ transplant recipients. METHODS: We identified a Swedish population-based cohort of solid organ transplant recipients in the National Patient Register 1970 to 2008 and linked it to the Cancer and Cause-of-Death Register. Overall and cause-specific mortality was estimated using Cox regression. RESULTS: Of 10,448 eligible recipients, 416 (4%) had a prior malignancy unrelated to the indication for transplantation diagnosed 2 months or more before surgery (median, 5.7 years). Mortality among cancer history recipients was 30% increased after transplantation, compared with other recipients (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-1.5; P<0.001), driven by cancer-specific death with no increase in cardiovascular, infectious, or other noncancer mortality. An increased rate of death due to cancer history was primarily observed among nonkidney recipients (adjusted HR(nonkidney), 1.8; 95% CI, 1.3-2.5; HR(kidney), 1.2; 95% CI, 1.0-1.4). Rates were greatest for patients with waiting times of 5 years or less but persisted with waiting times more than 10 years among kidney and nonkidney recipients with prior aggressive cancer types (gastrointestinal, breast, kidney/urothelial, and hematologic malignancies). CONCLUSION: We conclude that organ transplant recipients with cancer history are at a moderately increased rate of death after transplantation, driven primarily by death due to cancer recurrence.

Risk of skin cancer and other malignancies in kidney, liver, heart and lung transplant recipients 1970 to 2008--a Swedish population-based study.

Organ transplant recipients are at increased risk of a wide range of malignancies, especially cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas (SCC). Few previous population-based studies have quantified and compared cancer risks according to graft type and with long-term follow-up. Using nationwide Swedish registers, we identified 10,476 recipients transplanted from 1970 to 2008 and followed them for cancer occurrence. Relative risks of cancer in comparison with the general population were expressed as standardized incidence ratios (SIR) and within the transplanted cohort as incidence rate ratios (IRR). During a total follow-up of 93,432 person-years, patients were diagnosed with 1,175 cancers excluding SCC, and with 2,231 SCC, SIR(cancer excl SCC) 2.4 (95% CI, 2.2-2.5); SIR(SCC) 121 (95% CI, 116-127). Cancer risks were most increased among heart and/or lung recipients SIR(cancer excl SCC) 3.3 (95% CI, 2.8-4.0); SIR(SCC) 198 (95% CI, 174-224), followed by kidney SIR(cancer excl SCC) 2.3 (95% CI, 2.1-2.4); SIR(SCC) 121 (95% CI, 116-127) and liver recipients SIR(cancer excl SCC) 2.3 (95% CI, 1.9-2.8); SIR(SCC) 32 (95% CI, 24-42). During follow-up, risk of cancer excluding SCC remained stable while risk of SCC tripled over 20 years irrespective of graft type, partly due to a subgroup of patients developing new SCCs at a rapidly increasing rate. In summary, post-transplant cancer risk varied by transplanted organ and by cancer site, with the bulk of the excess risk driven by an exceptionally high and accelerating risk of SCC. These findings underscore the importance of regular skin screening in organ transplant recipients.

Trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole does not affect the pharmacokinetics of sirolimus in renal transplant recipients.

AIMS: The influence of the trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole combination on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of sirolimus, a potent macrocyclic immunosuppressant, was studied in renal transplant recipients. METHODS: Fifteen kidney transplant recipients were treated with sirolimus 8-23 mg m(-2) in combination with azathioprine and prednisolone from the day of transplantation. Whole blood sirolimus AUC and C(max) were determined on days 6 and 7 after transplantation. On day 7, sirolimus was coadministered with the first dose of trimethoprim (80 mg) and sulphamethoxazole (400 mg). RESULTS: On day 6, the mean (95% confidence interval) whole blood sirolimus AUC((0-24 h)) was 1040 (846, 1234) ng ml(-1) and mean C(max) was 109 (88, 129) ng ml(-1). Corresponding values on day 7 were AUC((0-24 h)) 1060 (826, 1293) ng ml(-1) and C(max) mean 107 (87, 127) ng ml(-1). The mean difference in the dose-corrected AUC((0-24 h)) was 0.40% (-9.4, +10). CONCLUSIONS: A single dose of trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole does not affect the pharmacokinetics of sirolimus in renal transplant patients.