Association Between Clinician-Level Factors and Patient Outcomes in Virtual and In-Person Outpatient Treatment for Substance Use Disorders: Multilevel Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The use of virtual treatment services increased dramatically during the COVID-19 pandemic. Unfortunately, large-scale research on virtual treatment for substance use disorder (SUD), including factors that may influence outcomes, has not advanced with the rapidly changing landscape. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the link between clinician-level factors and patient outcomes in populations receiving virtual and in-person intensive outpatient services. METHODS: Data came from patients (n=1410) treated in a virtual intensive outpatient program (VIOP) and an in-person intensive outpatient program (IOP), who were discharged between January 2020 and March 2021 from a national treatment organization. Patient data were nested by treatment providers (n=58) examining associations with no-shows and discharge with staff approval. Empathy, comfort with technology, perceived stress, resistance to change, and demographic covariates were examined at the clinician level. RESULTS: The VIOP (ß=-5.71; P=.03) and the personal distress subscale measure (ß=-6.31; P=.003) were negatively associated with the percentage of no-shows. The VIOP was positively associated with discharges with staff approval (odds ratio [OR] 2.38, 95% CI 1.50-3.76). Clinician scores on perspective taking (ß=-9.22; P=.02), personal distress (ß=-9.44; P=.02), and male clinician gender (ß=-6.43; P=.04) were negatively associated with in-person no-shows. Patient load was positively associated with discharge with staff approval (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02-1.06). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, patients in the VIOP had fewer no-shows and a higher rate of successful discharge. Few clinician-level characteristics were significantly associated with patient outcomes. Further research is necessary to understand the relationships among factors such as clinician gender, patient load, personal distress, and patient retention.

Genome-wide association study for circulating FGF21 in patients with alcohol use disorder: Molecular links between the SNHG16 locus and catecholamine metabolism.

OBJECTIVE: Alcohol consumption can increase circulating levels of fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21). The effects of FGF21 in the central nervous system are associated with the regulation of catecholamines, neurotransmitters that play a crucial role in reward pathways. This study aims to identify genetic variants associated with FGF21 levels and evaluate their functional role in alcohol use disorder (AUD). METHODS: We performed a genome-wide association study (GWAS) using DNA samples from 442 AUD subjects recruited from the Mayo Clinic Center for the Individualized Treatment of Alcoholism Study. Plasma FGF21 levels were measured using Olink proximity extension immunoassays. Alcohol consumption at time of entry into the study was measured using the self-reported timeline followback method. Functional genomic studies were performed using HepG2 cells and induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived brain organoids. RESULTS: Plasma FGF21 levels were positively correlated with recent alcohol consumption and gamma-glutamyl transferase levels, a commonly used marker for heavy alcohol use. One variant, rs9914222, located 5' of SNHG16 on chromosome 17 was associated with plasma FGF21 levels (p = 4.60E-09). This variant was also associated with AUD risk (ß: -3.23; p:0.0004). The rs9914222 SNP is an eQTL for SNHG16 in several brain regions, i.e., the variant genotype was associated with decreased expression of SNHG16. The variant genotype for the rs9914222 SNP was also associated with higher plasma FGF21 levels. Knockdown of SNHG16 in HepG2 cells resulted in increased FGF21 concentrations and decreased expression and enzyme activity for COMT, an enzyme that plays a key role in catecholamine metabolism. Finally, we demonstrated that ethanol significantly induced FGF21, dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine concentrations in iPSC-derived brain organoids. CONCLUSIONS: GWAS for FGF21 revealed a SNHG16 genetic variant associated with FGF21 levels which are associated with recent alcohol consumption. Our data suggest that SNHG16 can regulate FGF21 concentrations and decrease COMT expression and enzyme activity which, in turn, have implications for the regulation of catecholamines. (The ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00662571).

In-Person Versus Telehealth Setting for the Delivery of Substance Use Disorder Treatment: Ecologically Valid Comparison Study.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly transformed substance use disorder (SUD) treatment in the United States, with many web-based treatment services being used for this purpose. However, little is known about the long-term treatment effectiveness of SUD interventions delivered through digital technologies compared with in-person treatment, and even less is known about how patients, clinicians, and clinical characteristics may predict treatment outcomes. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to analyze baseline differences in patient demographics and clinical characteristics across traditional and telehealth settings in a sample of participants (N=3642) who received intensive outpatient program (IOP) substance use treatment from January 2020 to March 2021. METHODS: The virtual IOP (VIOP) study is a prospective longitudinal cohort design that follows adult (aged ≥18 years) patients who were discharged from IOP care for alcohol and substance use-related treatment at a large national SUD treatment provider between January 2020 and March 2021. Data were collected at baseline and up to 1 year after discharge from both in-person and VIOP services through phone- and web-based surveys to assess recent substance use and general functioning across several domains. RESULTS: Initial baseline descriptive data were collected on patient demographics and clinical inventories. No differences in IOP setting were detected by race (χ22=0.1; P=.96), ethnicity (χ22=0.8; P=.66), employment status (χ22=2.5; P=.29), education level (χ24=7.9; P=.10), or whether participants presented with multiple SUDs (χ28=11.4; P=.18). Significant differences emerged for biological sex (χ22=8.5; P=.05), age (χ26=26.8; P<.001), marital status (χ24=20.5; P<.001), length of stay (F2,3639=148.67; P<.001), and discharge against staff advice (χ22=10.6; P<.01). More differences emerged by developmental stage, with emerging adults more likely to be women (χ23=40.5; P<.001), non-White (χ23=15.8; P<.001), have multiple SUDs (χ23=453.6; P<.001), have longer lengths of stay (F3,3638=13.51; P<.001), and more likely to be discharged against staff advice (χ23=13.3; P<.01). CONCLUSIONS: The findings aim to deepen our understanding of SUD treatment efficacy across traditional and telehealth settings and its associated correlates and predictors of patient-centered outcomes. The results of this study will inform the effective development of data-driven benchmarks and protocols for routine outcome data practices in treatment settings.

Telehealth Services for Substance Use Disorders During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Longitudinal Assessment of Intensive Outpatient Programming and Data Collection Practices.

BACKGROUND: The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic necessitated the rapid transition of many types of substance use disorder (SUD) treatments to telehealth formats, despite limited information about what makes treatment effective in this novel format. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to examine the feasibility and effectiveness of virtual intensive outpatient programming (IOP) treatment for SUD in the context of a global pandemic, while considering the unique challenges posed to data collection during an unprecedented public health crisis. METHODS: The study is based on a longitudinal study with a baseline sample of 3642 patients who enrolled in intensive outpatient addiction treatment (in-person, hybrid, or virtual care) from January 2020 to March 2021 at a large substance use treatment center in the United States. The analytical sample consisted of patients who completed the 3-month postdischarge outcome survey as part of routine outcome monitoring (n=1060, 29.1% response rate). RESULTS: No significant differences were detected by delivery format in continuous abstinence (χ22=0.4, P=.81), overall quality of life (F2,826=2.06, P=.13), financial well-being (F2,767=2.30, P=.10), psychological well-being (F2,918=0.72, P=.49), and confidence in one's ability to stay sober (F2,941=0.21, P=.81). Individuals in hybrid programming were more likely to report a higher level of general health than those in virtual IOP (F2,917=4.19, P=.01). CONCLUSIONS: Virtual outpatient care for the treatment of SUD is a feasible alternative to in-person-only programming, leading to similar self-reported outcomes at 3 months postdischarge. Given the many obstacles presented throughout data collection during a pandemic, further research is needed to better understand under what conditions telehealth is an acceptable alternative to in-person care.

Identification of resiliency processes in dual-trauma couples: An exploration of self-reported relational strengths and weaknesses.

OBJECTIVE: Empirical knowledge about "dual-trauma couples" (DTC), characterized by both partners with a history of trauma exposure and presentation of trauma-related symptoms, is especially deficient. We analyzed DTC partners' qualitative data culled from the Relationship Evaluation Questionnaire (Busby et al., 2001) to ascertain dyadic resiliency processes within dual-trauma couples. METHOD: A data-reductive thematic analysis on short-answer responses of reported relational strengths and weaknesses from female (n = 822) and male partners' (n = 831) yielded several processes that provide insight into individual perceptions, behaviors, and past experiences, and dyadic interactions that may foster or hinder effective resilience in DTC. RESULTS: Participant responses highlighted existing dyadic strengths that fostered effective couple adaptative processes: shared beliefs and goals, mutual collaboration and psychological flexibility, and dyadic connectedness. Barriers to couple resiliency included individual perceptions, behaviors, and past experiences, and dyadic interactions that exacerbated relational instability, emotional unsafety, contentious communication, and difficulties with distress tolerance. CONCLUSIONS: Results promote a balanced conceptualization (i.e., inclusion of both adaptive and maladaptive interactions) of couples affected by trauma exposure. Implications for clinical treatment and several areas for future research are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).