Are contaminated soil and groundwater remediation with nanoscale zero-valent iron sustainable? An analysis of case studies.

Nanoscale zero valent iron (nZVI) is globally the main nanomaterial used in contaminated site remediation. This study aims to evaluate the sustainability of using nZVI in the nanoremediation of contaminated sites and to determine the factors that affect the sustainability of the use of nZVI in remediation. Five case studies of nZVI use on a pilot scale were selected. Life cycle analysis tools were used to evaluate environmental, economic, social impacts, and sustainability. The functional unit of the life cycle analyses was 1.00 m3 of remediated soil and groundwater. Case study of Brazil was the least sustainable, while case study of United States was the most sustainable. Only the modification of the functional unit results in variations in the sustainability index. Different factors influence the sustainability of nZVI in remediation, the main factor being the amount of nZVI used in the processes. Finally, this work contributes significantly to the state-of-the-art sustainable use of nZVI in remediation. This is a pioneering study in the detailed and comprehensive assessment of the sustainability of the use of nZVI in remediation. Through the analysis of case studies, it is possible to determine the main factors that influence the sustainability of the nZVI remediation life cycle.

Design of a central tool for sustainability evaluation and weighting to decision-making support of contaminated soils remediation.

Sustainable remediation remains unstandardized and ambiguously regulated, thereby limiting its adoption in the management of contaminated areas. Although a considerable number of tools are available for this purpose, numerous shortcomings continue to be detected, especially with regard to the integration of a complete assessment of impact and sustainability into a single framework. In view of these problems, the objective in this study was to develop and validate an integrated tool for assessing the sustainability of remediation techniques for contaminated soils. To support the sustainability analysis, were prepared impact assessment matrices, which list components and criteria for obtaining integrated impact scores for each sustainability dimension/pillar (i.e., social, economic, and environmental), factor, and component. These impact scores were incorporated and fitted into a mathematical model used to ascertain the sustainability of the techniques. The tool was subsequently validated by comparing and analyzing the sustainability with which five techniques: phytoremediation, electrokinetics and excavation/disposal (Case Study I), nanoremediation and soil washing (Case Study II). The techniques' probabilities of sustainability followed the order presented in the preceding statement. The determination of sustainability was supported by the direct interaction between the effects derived under each dimension and technique. These findings led to the conclusion that the proposed tool prioritizes the basic principles of sustainability, which call for harmony among the three pillars, and that it is a favorable instrument for the evaluation and selection of a sustainable remediation technique.

Social life cycle assessment of the nanoscale zero-valent iron synthesis process for application in contaminated site remediation.

Nanoscale zero-valent iron (nZVI) is the main nanomaterial used in environmental remediation processes. However, as with any remediation technique, the production and the use of nanomaterials can also cause environmental, economic, and social impacts. Thus, the present study investigated the social life cycle analysis (S-LCA) of nZVI production methods applied in environmental remediation. Three production methods of nZVI were selected for analysis: milling, reduction with sodium borohydride, and reduction with hydrogen gas. The social life cycle analysis was developed based on the ISO 14040 standard steps. Limits of the S-LCA system involve the stages of raw material extraction and manufacturing when not considering the use of nZVI postproduction. The analysis of social impact was conducted considering the involved stakeholders, through the application and improvement of an existing methodology and through the following procedures: characterization of social indicators according to a normalized scale, identification of the normalization factor for the indicators, employment of a social questionnaire, calculation of the total points in each impact subcategory (midpoint), calculation of the total points in the impact categories (endpoint), and calculation of the Social Index. The three production methods of nZVI result in significantly equal Social Indices. All methods were classified as socially sustainable according to the implemented methodology. The sensitivity analysis demonstrates the results dependent with the geographic location of the inventory data, while changes in the weighting can affect the Social Index results. Overall, this study significantly contributed to the state-of-the-art application of S-LCA in studies using nanomaterials; however, several limitations were also observed, and thus, steps for future development were suggested to future researches. In addition, this study improved the S-LCA methodology which can be used to assess the social impact of any product.

Nano scale zero valent iron production methods applied to contaminated sites remediation: An overview of production and environmental aspects.

The nano scale zero valent iron (nZVI) is the most used material in the remediation process. The inclusion of sustainability in the remediation process has also been gaining prominence. Sustainable remediation seeks to consider the environmental, economic and social impacts of remediation. Thus, this article aims to: (i) identify and describe nZVI production methods and (ii) evaluate their environmental aspects. Thus, this research was carried out in two stages. The first consisted of systematic bibliographical research to identify and describe nZVI production methods. In the second stage, an environmental analysis of the methods was performed considering the methodology of life cycle inventory assessment. Based on the inventory analysis, a classification of environmental aspects was performed, which included criteria, icons and a color scale. Nine nZVI production methods were identified, which comprised different technologies and processes. All methods had negative environmental aspects, such as high energy consumption, waste, wastewater generation and atmospheric emissions. In the classification of methods with regard to environmental aspects, the milling method had the best score, and the ultrasonic wave method the worst. Overall, this study contributes significantly to the detailed knowledge of nZVI synthesis methods in relation to production processes and their environmental aspects.

Life cycle sustainability assessment of the nanoscale zero-valent iron synthesis process for application in contaminated site remediation.

Nanoscale zero-valent iron (nZVI) is the main nanomaterial used in environmental remediation processes. The present study aims to evaluate the life cycle sustainability of nZVI production methods applied in environmental remediation. Three production methods of nZVI were selected for analysis: milling, liquid reduction with sodium borohydride, and chemical reduction with hydrogen gas (in two approaches: considering the goethite and hematite synthesis and after using in nZVI production and, using goethite and hematite particles already synthesized for nZVI production). The life cycle sustainability assessment was carried out based on a multi-criteria and multi-attribute analysis. The multi-criteria analysis was used to determine impact category preferences of different specialists in sustainability and remediation, and calculate the sustainability score through a linear additive model. Finally, a Monte Carlo simulation was used to quantify the results uncertainty. The functional unit considered was 1.00 kg of nZVI produced. The milling method and the hydrogen gas method in approach considering the use goethite and hematite particles already synthesized were the most sustainable. Moreover, the sustainability index was found to be influenced by the considered location scenarios as well as the perspectives of the different specialists, which was essential in producing a more accurate and comprehensive evaluation of the aforementioned sustainability methods. Overall, this study significantly contributed to applications of the state-of-the-art life cycle sustainability assessment in studies regarding nanomaterials, employing a simple methodology that included an analysis of different specialists. In addition, this is the first article that uses life cycle sustainability assessment in nanomaterials.

Proposal for an optimized method for sustainable remediation evaluation and application: implementation of a multi-criteria process.

As sustainable remediation methods do not yet have a consolidated approach, a detailed assessment of the level of satisfaction for sustainability prospects is necessary. So, this study aims to evaluate the sustainability level of sustainable remediation methods according to the visions of decision makers in this field, in order to propose an optimized method that best represents its approach. We considered eight methods applied to sustainable remediation and nine decision criteria for evaluation. The analytical hierarchy process (AHP) of multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) was applied to judge and weigh the criteria by stakeholders. These weights were used to calculate the degrees of sustainability for all the methods, to classify these within a ranking, and to optimize the one that obtained the best performance. The results indicated that when the criteria were weighted, the criterion (C7), protection of human health and the environment in general, obtained the best placement, and the degree of sustainability achieved by each method indicates that ITRC (Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council) had the best performance. Finally, the proposal method resulted in an explicit approach of all the considered criteria. This article presents a new approach compared with those already applied in this context and provides more robust resources to examine to what extent the methods integrate the premises of sustainable remediation. Graphical Abstract .

Sustainable remediation through the risk management perspective and stakeholder involvement: A systematic and bibliometric view of the literature.

Sustainable remediation is a new way of thinking and acting in the management of contaminated sites. This research aims to identify and structure the state-of-the-art of sustainable remediation from the risk management and stakeholder involvement perspective. A systematic and bibliometric study of scientific production was performed on scientific papers indexed in the Scopus and Web of Science databases with the objectives: 1) to select a bibliographic portfolio that is aligned with the perception of the researchers in regard to theme, 2) to perform a bibliometric analysis of the selected bibliographic portfolio, and 3) to conduct a thematic synthesis and identify the integration of sustainable remediation from the risk management and stakeholder involvement perspective. The results indicated that although sustainable remediation is a recent theme it presents a promising field for development worldwide, verified by the growing number of publications in recent years. A change is observed in the way risk management is considered with the rise of sustainable remediation, demonstrated by different approaches in publications. Likewise, the involvement of stakeholders is widely discussed, and the importance of their participation in decision-making processes in the field of sustainable remediation is identified. This research brings several and new contributions as it provides with a detailed overview and guidance about the main characteristics and peculiarities as well as what already exists, the form to approach, the advances and what still needs to be improved so that the perception of stakeholders and risk management are better understood within the context of sustainable remediation.

Application of life cycle assessment as a tool for evaluating the sustainability of contaminated sites remediation: A systematic and bibliographic analysis.

As the discussion surrounding sustainable remediation has advanced, numerous tools have been developed to evaluate the sustainability of remediation technologies, including life cycle assessment (LCA). In the present study, a systematic and bibliometric analysis of scientific articles indexed in the databases of Scopus and the Web of Science in the field of LCA was performed, particularly studies relating to the remediation of contaminated sites from a sustainability perspective. We selected a bibliographic portfolio (BP) of papers related to sustainable remediation using LCA. Then, we performed a bibliometric analysis of the selected BP, presenting theoretical development, highlighting the authors, journals, and countries associated with these publications. Finally, we conducted a thematic synthesis and reviewed the prospects for future research. The BP was composed of 44 papers from 2007 to 2018. In 2018 there was the highest number of publications, corresponding to 27% of the total BP. The results showed that developed countries have generated the largest number of publications, whereas developing countries had lower representation in the BP. However, China stands out as the second country with the highest number of publications. The thematic analysis showed that most articles have aimed to assess the environmental impacts of remediation techniques. However, several publications have performed a broader analysis considering the economic and social pillars of sustainability through using LCA in conjunction with other tools. The study also highlights the main application of LCA in decision-making on the remediation processes in the context of sustainable remediation. The present research study makes several new contributions, providing academics and practitioners with an overview of the implementation of LCA in the field of sustainable remediation of contaminated sites through sorting published data according to scientific indexes and bibliometrics, describing the main research approaches, and highlighting prospects for new research.