Impact of dementia status on intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke: Retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Individuals with dementia are underrepresented in interventional studies for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). This research gap creates a bias against their treatment in clinical practice. Our goal was to compare the safety and efficacy of intravenous-thrombolysis (t-PA) and endovascular treatment (EVT) in individuals with or without pre-AIS dementia. METHOD: A retrospective study of AIS patients receiving t-PA or EVT between 2019 and 2022. Patients were classified as dementia on a case-by-case review of baseline assessment. Additional variables included demographic, vascular risk factors, AIS severity and treatment. Outcomes of interest were intracerebral hemorrhage, mortality in 90-days, and the difference in modified rankin scale (mRS) before AIS and in 90-days follow-up. Outcomes were compared across non-matched groups and following propensity-score matching. RESULTS: Altogether, 628 patients were included, of which 68 had pre-AIS dementia. Compared to non-dementia group, dementia group were older, had a higher rate of vascular risk factors, higher pre-stroke mRS and higher baseline NIHSS. Individuals with dementia had higher rates of mortality (25% vs.11%,p < 0.01) on non-matched comparison. All cohort and restricted t-PA EVT matched analysis showed no difference in any outcome. Regression analysis confirmed that AIS severity at presentation and its treatment, not dementia, were the chief contributors to patients' outcomes. DISCUSSION: Our results indicate that pre-AIS dementia does not impact the efficacy or safety of EVT or t-PA for AIS. We thus call for more inclusive research on stroke therapy with regards to baseline cognitive status. Such studies are urgently required to inform stroke guidelines and enhance care.

Intracranial stenting for large vessel intracranial atherosclerotic disease: Retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) is a common cause for stroke and can be defined as symptomatic (stroke) or asymptomatic. Current guidelines recommend against intracranial stenting (ICS) for patients with ICAD; treatment of patients who failed the best medical therapy is still debatable. METHODS: We introduce a preliminary retrospective analysis of our tertiary stroke center during 2018-2022 of patients that were treated with ICS either in acute phase or elective (eICS). Study endpoints were stroke, functional outcome (modified Rankin Score [mRS] at 3 months), and serious adverse events. RESULTS: Thirty-three stents were implanted, 21 in acute group and 12 in the eICS group. Most patients (75%) were treated with a new generation self-expandible stent. One patient had peri-procedural stroke and four patients had transient ischemic event or stroke during follow-up. There were eight cases of death (all acute group patients, seven of which occurred in the posterior circulation). Fifteen patients (62%) had favorable clinical outcomes (mRS 0-2 for pre-stroke), of which 10/10 (100%) in the eICS, the other two eICS patients had pre-morbid mRS 3 with no clinical change. CONCLUSIONS: The evolution of new devices for ICS and the accumulating interventional experience might open a new era. As no other effective alternative treatment options exist for preventing recurrent stroke, stenting is still common practice in many tertiary centers either urgently or as elective procedure for refractory cases.

Effect of small vessel disease severity on blood pressure management after endovascular therapy in the BP TARGET trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Acute ischaemic stroke patients with cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD), including cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) and white matter hyperintensities (WMHs), have worse outcomes. The effect was investigated of two blood pressure strategies (intensive vs. standard) and blood pressure variability (BPV) after reperfusion according to CSVD burden in the BP TARGET trial. METHODS: Patients with available magnetic resonance imaging at baseline were included. CMBs were described as absent or present and WMH severity was described according to the Fazekas classification (0-1, absent-mild; 2-3, moderate to severe). Outcomes consisted of any intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) at 24 h and favorable outcome at 90 days (modified Rankin Scale score between 0 and 2). RESULTS: In all, 246 patients were included. The intensive systolic blood pressure target was not associated with lower rates of ICH or favorable outcome according to CSVD subgroups (all p values >0.35). Several BPV parameters were associated with increased odds of ICH in patients with CMBs but not in patients without CMBs (diastolic blood pressure coefficient of variation, odds ratio 2.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13-3.77, in patients with ≥1 CMB vs. 0.94, 95% CI 0.68-1.31, in patients without CMBs, phet  = 0.026). Several diastolic BPV parameters were associated with worse outcomes in patients with severe WMHs but not in patients without WMHs (diastolic blood pressure coefficient of variation, odds ratio 0.32, 95% CI 0.17-0.61, in patients with severe WMHs vs. 1.09, 95% CI 0.67-1.79, in patients without WMHs; phet  = 0.003). CONCLUSION: No effect of the intensive systolic blood pressure management strategy was found on ICH occurrence or functional outcome according to CSVD burden. BPV was associated with higher odds of ICH in patients with CMBs and worse outcome in patients with moderate-to-severe WMHs.

Effect of time delay in inter-hospital transfer on outcomes of endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke.

Background: Endovascular treatment (EVT) with mechanical thrombectomy is the standard of care for large vessel occlusion (LVO) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). The most common approach today is to perform EVT in a comprehensive stroke center (CSC) and transfer relevant patients for EVT from a primary stroke center (PSC). Rapid and efficient treatment of LVO is a key factor in achieving a good clinical outcome. Methods: We present our retrospective cohort of patients who underwent EVT between 2018 and 2021, including direct admissions and patients transferred from PSC. Primary endpoints were time intervals (door-to-puncture, onset-to-puncture, door-to-door) and favorable outcome (mRS ≤ 2) at 90 days. Secondary outcomes were successful recanalization, mortality rate, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). Additional analysis was performed for transferred patients not treated with EVT; endpoints were time intervals, favorable outcomes, and reason for exclusion of EVT. Results: Among a total of 405 patients, 272 were admitted directly to our EVT center and 133 were transferred; there was no significant difference between groups in the occluded vascular territory, baseline NIHSS, wake-up strokes, or thrombolysis rate. Directly admitted patients had a shorter door-to-puncture time than transferred patients (190 min vs. 293 min, p < 0.001). The median door-to-door shift time was 204 min. We found no significant difference in functional independence, successful recanalization rates, or sICH rates. The most common reason to exclude transferred patients from EVT was clinical or angiographic improvement (55.6% of patients). Conclusion: Our results show that transferring patients to the EVT center does not affect clinical outcomes, despite the expected delay in EVT. Reassessment of patients upon arrival at the CSC is crucial, and patient selection should be done based on both time and tissue window.

Association of Contrast Enhancement After Reperfusion With Outcomes According to Blood Pressure Lowering in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Observational studies described associations between higher systolic blood pressure (SBP) values and intracranial hemorrhages (ICHs) and worse outcomes after successful reperfusion by endovascular therapy (EVT). However, the BP-TARGET trial [BP-Target in Acute Ischemic Stroke to Reduce Hemorrhage after EVT] found that an intensive SBP target did not reduce ICH rates after successful EVT. The presence of contrast enhancement (CE) immediately after reperfusion is also associated with higher odds of ICH and worse outcomes. Our research question was to investigate the effect of 2 SBP strategies after reperfusion on ICH rates and functional outcomes according to the presence of CE in the BP-TARGET trial. We hypothesized that patients with CE could benefit from an intensive SBP control. METHODS: We included BP-TARGET patients in whom a brain flat panel was performed immediately after reperfusion. We described CE as present or absent, ICH consisted of any radiographic ICH 24 hours after EVT, and unfavorable outcome consisted of a modified Rankin Scale score between 3 and 6 at 3 months. RESULTS: Among the 324 patients randomized in BP-TARGET, 164 were included in this analysis, of whom 113 (68.9%) presented CE after reperfusion. The 24-hour mean SBP was significantly lower in the intensive SBP group compared with the standard group (129.7 vs 138.3 mm Hg, p < 0.001). Patients with CE and randomized in the intensive and standard SBP group had increased ICH rates: aOR = 11.26, 95% CI 4.59-27.63, and aOR = 4.08, 95% CI 1.75-9.50, respectively. However, the test of heterogeneity did not reach the significant level (aOR = 2.76, 95% CI 0.80 to 9.48, p = 0.11). Patients with CE and randomized in the intensive SBP group had also higher odds of unfavorable outcomes (aOR = 2.91, 95% CI 1.24-6.82), but this association was not significant in the standard SBP group (aOR = 1.89, 95% CI 0.85-4.23). No significant heterogeneity was found between the 2 groups (aOR, 1.54, 95% CI 0.48 to 4.97, p = 0.47). DISCUSSION: Altogether, patients with CE and randomized in the intensive SBP group did not have lower rates of ICH or improved outcomes compared with the standard SBP group, as CE was associated with higher odds of ICH in both groups, without significant heterogeneity. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: NCT03160677. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class IV evidence that for adults with contrast-enhancing lesions after successful EVT of an AIS, intensive blood pressure management did not significantly increase the risk of ICH.

Efficacy and safety of endovascular treatment in patients older than 90 with acute ischemic stroke: A retrospective cohort study.

Background: Endovascular treatment (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with large vessel occlusion (LVO) is the standard of care treatment today. Although elderly patients comprise the majority of stroke patients, octogenarians and non-agenarians are often poorly represented or even excluded in clinical trials. We looked at the safety and efficacy of EVT for AIS with LVO in patients over 90 (Non-agenarians), in comparison to patients aged 80-89 (Octogenarians) and to patients younger than 80 years (<80yrs). Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent EVT in a single stroke center during 2015-2019. Patients were divided into three subgroups based on their age: Non-agenarians, Octogenarians, and patients <80 yrs. The groups were compared based on baseline characteristics and stroke variables. In addition, we compared clinical and radiological outcomes including functional outcomes measured by the modified ranking scale (mRS) at day 90, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and mortality. Results: Three hundred and forty seven patients were included, 20 (5.7%) of them were non-agenarians, 96 (27.7%) were octogenarians and 231 (66.6%) were <80 yrs. No statistically significant differences were found between groups regarding baseline characteristics, cardiovascular risk factors, stroke variables, or successful revascularization rates. Puncture to recanalization time intervals showed an age-related non-significant increase between the groups with a median time of 67.8, 51.6, and 40.2 min of the non-agenarian, octogenarian, and <80 yrs groups, respectively (p-value = 0.3). Favorable outcome (mRS 0-2) was 15% in non-agenarians vs. 13.54% in octogenarians (p-value = 1) and 40.2% in <80 yrs. sICH occurred among 5% of non-agenarians, compared to 4% among octogenarians (p-value = 1) and 2.6% in <80 yrs. The mortality rate at 3 months was significantly higher (55%) in non-agenarians compared to octogenarians (28%) (p-value = 0.03) and to <80 yrs (19.48%). Conclusion: EVT in nonagenarians demonstrated a high rate of successful revascularization, whilst also showing an increased rate of sICH when compared to octogenarians. Mortality rates showed an age-related correlation. Although further studies are needed to clarify the patient selection algorithm and identify sub-groups of elderly patients that could benefit from EVT, we showed that some patients do benefit from EVT therefore exclusion should not be based on age alone.

Effect of time from onset to endovascular therapy on outcomes: the National Acute Stroke Israeli (NASIS)-REVASC registry.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular therapy (EVT) is currently the most effective treatment for emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO) stroke. Earlier treatment is associated with a better clinical outcome. Our aim was to examine the association between onset-to-EVT (OTE) time and clinical outcomes using real-world nationwide data from the National Acute Stroke ISraeli (NASIS)-REVASC registry. METHODS: Stroke patients undergoing EVT within the Endovascular Capable Centres (ECCs) in Israel between January 2014 and March 2016 were prospectively included. Several clinical and radiological outcomes were evaluated. The association between OTE time and outcomes was analyzed with logistic regression models using time as a continuous variable and then by OTE groups of <2, 2-4, 4-6, and >6 hours. RESULTS: 299 patients with acute stroke were included in the analysis. OTE time was significantly associated with favorable outcomes. ORs for each hour of delay in EVT were 0.84 (95% CI 0.71 to 0.99) for significant early recovery, 0.80 (95% CI 0.68 to 0.94) for discharge to home, 0.80 (95% CI 0.66 to 0.95) for freedom from disability at discharge, and 0.78 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.91) for excellent reperfusion (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Ischemia 3). The <2 OTE group was significantly associated with better outcomes than the ≥2 OTE group including significant early recovery (OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.2 to 9.1), discharge to home (OR 3.32, 95% CI 1.3 to 8.5), and excellent reperfusion (OR 4.6, 95% CI 1.3 to 29.5). The same trend was observed for freedom from disability at discharge and 3 months (OR 2.08, 95% CI 0.7 to 5.7 and OR 2.57, 95% CI 0.8 to 8.3, respectively). Only 1% of transferred patients achieved an OTE time of <2 hours. CONCLUSIONS: Nationwide real-life registry data indicate that benefit from EVT is strongly associated with OTE time and is most prominent within the 'two golden hours' from stroke onset. This time goal may not be applicable in inter-hospital transfer patients.

The Impact of the Mode of Thought in Complex Decisions: Intuitive Decisions are Better.

A number of recent studies have reported that decision quality is enhanced under conditions of inattention or distraction (unconscious thought; Dijksterhuis, 2004; Dijksterhuis and Nordgren, 2006; Dijksterhuis et al., 2006). These reports have generated considerable controversy, for both experimental (problems of replication) and theoretical reasons (interpretation). Here we report the results of four experiments. The first experiment replicates the unconscious thought effect, under conditions that validate and control the subjective criterion of decision quality. The second and third experiments examine the impact of a mode of thought manipulation (without distraction) on decision quality in immediate decisions. Here we find that intuitive or affective manipulations improve decision quality compared to analytic/deliberation manipulations. The fourth experiment combines the two methods (distraction and mode of thought manipulations) and demonstrates enhanced decision quality, in a situation that attempts to preserve ecological validity. The results are interpreted within a framework that is based on two interacting subsystems of decision-making: an affective/intuition based system and an analytic/deliberation system.