Risk factors for invasive aspergillosis in ICU patients with COVID-19: current insights and new key elements.

Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) has always been a challenging diagnosis and risk factors an important guide to investigate specific population, especially in Intensive Care Unit. Traditionally recognized risk factors for IPA have been haematological diseases or condition associated with severe immunosuppression, lately completed by chronic conditions (such as obstructive pulmonary disease, liver cirrhosis, chronic kidney disease and diabetes), influenza infection and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission. Recently, a new association with SARS-CoV2 infection, named COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA), has been reported worldwide, even if its basic epidemiological characteristics have not been completely established yet. In this narrative review, we aimed to explore the potential risk factors for the development of CAPA and to evaluate whether previous host factors or therapeutic approaches used in the treatment of COVID-19 critically ill patients (such as mechanical ventilation, intensive care management, corticosteroids, broad-spectrum antibiotics, immunomodulatory agents) may impact this new diagnostic category. Reviewing all English-language articles published from December 2019 to December 2020, we identified 21 papers describing risk factors, concerning host comorbidities, ICU management, and COVID-19 therapies. Although limited by the quality of the available literature, data seem to confirm the role of previous host risk factors, especially respiratory diseases. However, the attention is shifting from patients' related risk factors to factors characterizing the hospital and intensive care course, deeply influenced by specific features of COVID treatment itself. Prolonged invasive or non-invasive respiratory support, as well as the impact of corticosteroids and/or immunobiological therapies seem to play a pivotal role. ICU setting related factors, such as environmental factors, isolation conditions, ventilation systems, building renovation works, and temporal spread with respect to pandemic waves, need to be considered. Large, prospective studies based on new risk factors specific for CAPA are warranted to guide surveillance and decision of when and how to treat this particular population.

Neuroendocrine predictors of vasoplegia after cardiopulmonary bypass.

PURPOSE: Vasoplegia often complicates on-pump cardiac surgery. Systemic inflammatory response induced by extracorporeal circulation represents the major determinant, but adrenal insufficiency and postoperative vasopressin deficiency may have a role. Pathophysiological meaning of perioperative changes in endocrine markers of hydro-electrolyte balance has not still fully elucidated. Objectives of the present research study were to estimate the incidence of vasoplegia in a homogeneous cohort of not severe cardiopathic patients, to define the role of presurgical adrenal insufficiency, to evaluate copeptin and NT-proBNP trends in the perioperative. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study in the cardiac intensive care unit of a tertiary referral center. We evaluated 350 consecutive patients scheduled for cardiac surgery; 55 subjects completed the study. Both standard and low-dose corticotropin stimulation tests were performed in the preoperative; copeptin and NT-proBNP were evaluated in the preoperative (T0), on day 1 (T1) and day 7 (T2) after surgery. RESULTS: Nine subjects (16.3%) developed vasoplegic syndrome with longer bypass and clamping time (p < 0.001). Reduced response to low-dose ACTH test was not associated to vasoplegia. Preoperative copeptin > 16.9 pmol/L accurately predicted the syndrome (AUC 0.86, 95% CI 0.73-0.94; OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.04-1.32). An evident correlation was observed at 7 days postoperative between NT-proBNP and copeptin (r 0.88, 95% CI 0.8-0.93; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Preoperative impaired response to low-dose ACTH stimulation test is not a risk factor for post-cardiotomic vasoplegia; conversely, higher preoperative copeptin predicts the complication. On-pump cardiac surgery could be an interesting model of rapid heart failure progression.

Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in ICU-admitted COVID-19 patients: Keep an eye on the ball.

Here we report on seven intensive care unit (ICU) patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) who developed positive rectal swabs and invasive infections due to carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (CP-Kp). Notwithstanding the infection prevention measures introduced during the COVID-19 pandemic and changes in the hospitalised population, attention to CP-Kp infections must remain high, especially in the critically ill setting.

Low-dose Spinal Block With Continuous Epidural Infusion for Renal Transplantation in a Patient With Alport Syndrome: A Case Report.

OBJECTIVE: We aim to describe management of a patient receiving renal transplantation for chronic renal failure due to Alport syndrome with low dose of intrathecal bupivacaine and continuous epidural infusion of local anesthetic. CASE REPORT: A 38-years-old man with chronic renal failure secondary to Alport syndrome underwent kidney transplantation. Because of a high risk of respiratory and cardiovascular complications related to the patient's baseline lung disease and abnormalities in heart conduction, we selected combined spinal-epidural anesthesia. The block was ultrasound-guided and performed at the T12-L1 interspace with 4.5 mg of 0.5% intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine followed by a continuous epidural infusion of 0.5% levobupivacaine mixed with 25 µg of Fentanyl at the initial rate of 8 mL/h. Sensory block to T5-T6 was obtained within 10 minutes. The patient then received mild sedation with Propofol and Remifentanil. Methylprednisolone and diuretics were administered before vascular unclamping according to our internal protocol. Surgery lasted 3 hours with no clinical or procedural complication. CONCLUSIONS: Although renal transplantation is usually performed under general anesthesia, in a particularly complex patient with chronic renal failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and a worsened respiratory mechanics, we applied a combined approach with a low dose of intrathecal bupivacaine and continuous epidural infusion of local anesthetic. The technique did not affect hemodynamics while having a positive impact on recovery of function of the transplanted organ with rapid improvement of urine output, serum creatinine, and blood urea nitrogen levels.

A systematic review of the effects of adding neostigmine to local anesthetics for neuraxial administration in obstetric anesthesia and analgesia.

BACKGROUND: Drugs used in obstetric patients must accomplish two goals: efficacy and safety for both mother and fetus. Neostigmine has been co-administered epidurally and intrathecally with local anesthetics and other adjuncts in the obstetric setting. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy and incidence of adverse events related to the use of neostigmine in obstetric anesthesia. METHODS: A meta-analysis of randomized-controlled human trials was conducted using the data sources Google Scholar and PubMed (updated 1 November 2014). Inclusion criteria were: random allocation to treatment; comparison of neostigmine or neostigmine with local anesthetics and/or other adjuvants versus placebo or placebo with local anesthetics and/or other adjuvants; and approval by an ethics committee. RESULTS: The use of neostigmine as an adjuvant in neuraxial anesthesia is associated with a reduction in the dose of local anesthetic during labor analgesia and postoperative analgesia following cesarean section: mean reduction of local anesthetic (ropivacaine or bupivacaine) vs. control -4.08 (95% CI -6.7 to -1.5) mg/h (P=0.002). The risk of nausea was increased vs. control with intrathecal neostigmine (OR 8.99 [95% CI 4.74 to 17.05], P <0.001) but not with epidural neostigmine (OR 0.97 [95% CI 0.46 to 2.05], P=0.94). Use of neuraxial neostigmine was associated with a decrease in the risk of pruritus but there was no increase in the incidence of hypotension, dizziness or sedation and no effect on the incidence of abnormal fetal heart rate patterns or Apgar scores. CONCLUSIONS: Neuraxial administration of neostigmine significantly reduces local anesthetic consumption without serious adverse side effects to the mother or fetus. However, neostigmine is only recommended for epidural administration as intrathecal use significantly increases the incidence of maternal nausea and vomiting.

Friday night ventilation: a safety starting tool kit for mechanically ventilated patients.

We wish to report here a practical approach to an acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patient as devised by a group of intensivists with different expertise. The referral scenario is an intensive care unit of a Community Hospital with limited technology, where a young doctor, alone, must deal with this complicate syndrome during the night. The knowledge of pulse oximetry at room air and at 100% oxygen allows to estimate the PaO2 and the cause of hypoxemia, shunt vs. VA/Q maldistribution. The ARDS severity (mild [200

Time to reach a new steady state after changes of positive end expiratory pressure.

PURPOSE: To assess the time interval required to reach a new steady state of oxygenation-, ventilation-, respiratory mechanics- and hemodynamics-related variables after decreasing/increasing positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP). METHODS: In 23 patients (group 1) with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), PEEP was decreased from 10 to 5 cmH2O and, after 60', it was increased from 5 to 15 cmH2O. In 21 other ARDS patients (group 2), PEEP was increased from 10 to 15 cmH2O and, after 60', decreased from 15 to 5 cmH2O. Oxygenation, ventilation, respiratory mechanics and hemodynamic variables were recorded at time 5', 15', 30' and 60' after each PEEP change. RESULTS: When PEEP was decreased, PaO2, PaO2/FiO2, venous admixture and arterial oxygen saturation reached their equilibrium after 5'. In contrast, when PEEP was increased, the equilibrium was not reached even after 60'. The ventilation-related variables did not change significantly with PEEP. The respiratory system compliance, when PEEP was decreased, significantly worsened only after 60'. Hemodynamics did not change significantly with PEEP. In the individual patients the change of oxygenation-related variables and of respiratory system compliance observed after 5' could predict the changes recorded after 60'. This was not possible for PaCO2. CONCLUSIONS: We could not find a unique equilibration time for all the considered variables. However, in general, a decremental PEEP test requires far lower equilibrium time than an incremental PEEP test, suggesting a different time course for derecruitment and recruitment patterns.

Antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent nosocomial infections in patients in intensive care units: evidence that struggle to convince practising clinicians.

BACKGROUND: Pneumonia is an important cause of mortality in intensive care units. The incidence of pneumonia in such patients ranges between 7 and 40%, and the crude mortality from ventilator associated pneumonia may exceed 50%. Although not all deaths in patients with this form of pneumonia are directly attributable to pneumonia, it has been shown to contribute to mortality in intensive care units independently of other factors that are also strongly associated with such deaths. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review was to assess the effects of antibiotics for preventing respiratory tract infections and overall mortality in adults receiving intensive care. Search strategy. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (issue 3, 2003), which contains the Acute Respiratory Infections (ARI) Group specialised trials register; MEDLINE (January 1966 to September 2003); EMBASE (January 1990 to September 2003); proceedings of scientific meetings and reference lists of articles from January 1984 to December 2002. We also contacted investigators in the field. Selection criteria. Randomised trials of antibiotic prophylaxis for respiratory tract infections and deaths among adult intensive care unit patients. Data collection and analysis. At least two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed trial quality. RESULTS: Overall 36 trials involving 6922 people were included. There was variation in the antibiotics used, patient characteristics and risk of respiratory tract infections and mortality in the control groups. In 17 trials (involving 4295 patients) that tested a combination of topical and systemic antibiotic, the average rates of respiratory tract infections and deaths in the control group were 36% and 29% respectively. There was a significant reduction of both respiratory tract infections (odds ratio 0.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.29-0.41) and total mortality (odds ratio 0.78, 95% CI 0.68-0.89) in the treated group. On average 5 patients needed to be treated to prevent one infection and 21 patients to prevent one death. In 17 trials (involving 2664 patients) that tested topical antimicrobials alone (or comparing topical plus systemic versus systemic alone) the rates of respiratory tract infections and deaths in the control groups were 30 and 26% respectively. There was a significant reduction of respiratory tract infections (odds ratio 0.52, 95% CI 0.43-0.63), but not in total mortality (odds ratio 0.97, 95% CI 0.81-1.16) in the treated group. CONCLUSIONS: A combination of topical and systemic prophylactic antibiotics reduces respiratory tract infections and overall mortality in adult patients receiving intensive care. A treatment based on the use of topical prophylaxis alone reduces respiratory infections, but not mortality. The risk of occurrence of resistance as a negative consequence of antibiotic use was appropriately explored only in the most recent trial by de Jonge, which did not show any such effect.

Effectiveness and efficiency of intensive care medicine: variable costs in different diagnosis groups.

BACKGROUND: To establish the effectiveness of ICU treatment and the efficiency in the use of resources in patients stratified according to 10 diagnosis and two levels-of-care. To propose strategies aimed at reducing costs and improving efficiency in each patient group. METHODS: Multicentre prospective observational study. ICUs enrolled two cohorts of up to 10 consecutive patients with ICU stay >/= 48 h. Each with one of these diagnoses: trauma, brain-trauma, brain-hemorrhage, stroke, acute-on-chronic-obstructive-pulmonary disease, lung-injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome, heart failure, and scheduled/unscheduled abdominal surgery. The presence of active-life support divides high from low level-of-care treatments. Variable ICU costs were collected daily (bottom-up) for 21 days. We evaluated effectiveness (hospital survival) and efficiency (hospital-survivors variable-cost as a ratio of overall cost). RESULTS: Forty-two Italian general ICUs recruited 529 patients in 5 months. Mean ICU variable-costs significantly differed with diagnosis and level-of-care. Costs were positively affected by ICU length-of-stay, by duration of active-treatment. Outcome variably influenced costs. Medians of variable-costs per patient (1715 Euro) and patient-groups efficiencies (60.7%) identified four possible combinations between (low and high) cost and (low and high) efficiency groups. Moreover, efficiency was better than effectiveness in stroke, brain-hemorrhage and trauma, while it was worse in heart failure, acute-on-COPD or acute-lung injury. Overall ICU cost attributed only to survivors ranged from 699 (scheduled surgical) to 5906 (unscheduled surgical) Euro. Cost of non-survivors distributed to all patient was between 95 (scheduled-surgical) to 1633 (unscheduled-surgical) Euro. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of variable patient-specific cost was used as a tool to assess intensive care performance in patient subgroups with different diagnosis and levels-of-care.

Antibiotic prophylaxis to reduce respiratory tract infections and mortality in adults receiving intensive care.

BACKGROUND: Pneumonia is an important cause of mortality in intensive care units. The incidence of pneumonia in such patients ranges between 7% and 40%, and the crude mortality from ventilator associated pneumonia may exceed 50%. Although not all deaths in patients with this form of pneumonia are directly attributable to pneumonia, it has been shown to contribute to mortality in intensive care units independently of other factors that are also strongly associated with such deaths. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review was to assess the effects of antibiotics for preventing respiratory tract infections and overall mortality in adults receiving intensive care. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (issue 3, 2003), which contains the Acute Respiratory Infections (ARI) Group specialised trials register; MEDLINE (January 1966 to September 2003); EMBASE (January 1990 to September 2003); proceedings of scientific meetings and reference lists of articles from January 1984 to December 2002. We also contacted investigators in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials of antibiotic prophylaxis for respiratory tract infections and deaths among adult intensive care unit patients. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: At least two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed trial quality. MAIN RESULTS: Overall 36 trials involving 6922 people were included. There was variation in the antibiotics used, patient characteristics and risk of respiratory tract infections and mortality in the control groups. In 17 trials (involving 4295 patients) that tested a combination of topical and systemic antibiotic, the average rates of respiratory tract infections and deaths in the control group were 36% and 29% respectively. There was a significant reduction of both respiratory tract infections (odds ratio 0.35, 95% confidence interval 0.29 to 0.41) and total mortality (odds ratio 0.78, 95% confidence interval 0.68 to 0.89) in the treated group. On average 5 patients needed to be treated to prevent one infection and 21 patients to prevent one death. In 17 trials (involving 2664 patients) that tested topical antimicrobials alone (or comparing topical plus systemic versus systemic alone) the rates of respiratory tract infections and deaths in the control groups were 30% and 26% respectively. There was a significant reduction of respiratory tract infections (odds ratio 0.52, 95% confidence interval 0.43 to 0.63) but not in total mortality (odds ratio 0.97, 95% confidence interval 0.81 to 1.16) in the treated group. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: A combination of topical and systemic prophylactic antibiotics reduces respiratory tract infections and overall mortality in adult patients receiving intensive care. A treatment based on the use of topical prophylaxis alone reduces respiratory infections but not mortality. The risk of occurrence of resistance as a negative consequence of antibiotic use was appropriately explored only in the most recent trial by de Jonge which did not show any such effect.

Prone position in acute respiratory distress syndrome.

In the last few years prone positioning has been used increasingly in the treatment of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and this manoeuvre is now considered a simple and safe method to improve oxygenation. However, the physiological mechanisms causing respiratory function improvement as well as the real clinical benefit are not yet fully understood. The aim of this review is to discuss the physiological and clinical effects of prone positioning in patients with ARDS. The main physiological aims of prone positioning are: 1) to improve oxygenation; 2) to improve respiratory mechanics; 3) to homogenise the pleural pressure gradient, the alveolar inflation and the ventilation distribution; 4) to increase lung volume and reduce the amount of atelectatic regions; 5) to facilitate the drainage of secretions; and 6) to reduce ventilator-associated lung injury. According to the available data, the authors conclude that: 1) oxygenation improves in approximately 70-80% of patients with early acute respiratory distress syndrome; 2) the beneficial effects of oxygenation reduce after 1 week of mechanical ventilation; 3) the aetiology of acute respiratory distress syndrome may markedly affect the response to prone positioning; 4) extreme care is necessary when the manoeuvre is performed; 5) pressure sores are frequent and related to the number of pronations; 6) the supports used to prone and during positioning are different and nonstandardised among centres; and 7) intensive care unit and hospital stay and mortality still remain high despite prone positioning.

Effect of prone positioning on the survival of patients with acute respiratory failure.

BACKGROUND: Although placing patients with acute respiratory failure in a prone (face down) position improves their oxygenation 60 to 70 percent of the time, the effect on survival is not known. METHODS: In a multicenter, randomized trial, we compared conventional treatment (in the supine position) of patients with acute lung injury or the acute respiratory distress syndrome with a predefined strategy of placing patients in a prone position for six or more hours daily for 10 days. We enrolled 304 patients, 152 in each group. RESULTS: The mortality rate was 23.0 percent during the 10-day study period, 49.3 percent at the time of discharge from the intensive care unit, and 60.5 percent at 6 months. The relative risk of death in the prone group as compared with the supine group was 0.84 at the end of the study period (95 percent confidence interval, 0.56 to 1.27), 1.05 at the time of discharge from the intensive care unit (95 percent confidence interval, 0.84 to 1.32), and 1.06 at six months (95 percent confidence interval, 0.88 to 1.28). During the study period the mean (+/-SD) increase in the ratio of the partial pressure of arterial oxygen to the fraction of inspired oxygen, measured each morning while patients were supine, was greater in the prone than the supine group (63.0+/-66.8 vs. 44.6+/-68.2, P=0.02). The incidence of complications related to positioning (such as pressure sores and accidental extubation) was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although placing patients with acute respiratory failure in a prone position improves their oxygenation, it does not improve survival.

Mesenteric and renal oxygen transport during hemorrhage and reperfusion: evaluation of optimal goals for resuscitation.

BACKGROUND: Changes in flow to the gut and the kidney during hemorrhage and resuscitation contribute to organ dysfunction and outcome. We evaluated regional and splanchnic oxygen (O2) flow distribution and calculated oxygen supply distribution during hemorrhage and reperfusion and compared them with global measures. METHODS: Seven anesthetized pigs were instrumented to evaluate global hemodynamics, visceral blood flow, and oxygen transport. Tonometric pH probes were positioned in the stomach and jejunum. Animals were bled to 45 mm Hg for 1 hour. Crystalloids and blood were infused during the following 2 hours to normalize blood pressure, heart rate, urine output, and hemo- globin. RESULTS: During hemorrhage, mesenteric flow and O2 consumption were significantly decreased, whereas systemic consumption remained normal. Renal flow was reduced, but renal O2 consumption remained normal. After resuscitation, despite normal hemodynamics, neither systemic, mesenteric, nor renal O2 delivery returned to baseline. Lactate remained significantly increased. Arterial pH, base excess, and gastric and jejunal pH were all decreased. CONCLUSION: During hemorrhage, the gut is more prone than other regions to O2 consumption supply dependency. After resuscitation, standard clinical parameters do not detect residual O2 debt. Lactate, arterial pH, base excess, and intramucosal gut pH are all markers of residual tissue hypoperfusion.