Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Aging Ment Health ; 8(3): 201-11, 2004 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15203401

ABSTRACT

The study tested the hypotheses that integrated support, in which patients and carers are both supported by one professional staff member, will be more effective in reducing the feelings of (over)burden of carers and in positively influencing some potential determinants of experienced burden than non-integrated support, such as psychogeriatric day-care. A quasi-experimental pre-test/post-test control group design was applied with matched groups and measurements at baseline and after seven months. Fifty-five of the eighty dyads (31% dropped out) of persons with mild-to-moderate dementia and their carers who presented for four community meeting centres and three day-care centres in nursing homes over an 18 month period, were included in the study. The carers in the Meeting Centres Support (MCS) Program participated in an integrated family support program together with the persons with dementia, while the carers in the control group only received respite through psychogeriatric day-care. Standardized questionnaires were applied to measure some indicators of burden experienced by the carers (feelings of stress, life dissatisfaction, psychological and psychosomatic complaints), as well as some potential determinants of experienced burden (feeling of competence, coping strategies, experienced support and loneliness). Furthermore, as an indicator of feelings of (over)burden of the carer, the time between start of participation in one of the programs and institutionalization in a nursing home was calculated. After seven months the carers in the MCS group (n = 36), compared to the carers in regular psychogeriatric day-care (n = 19), showed a moderate positive effect on the feeling of competence (effect size 0.45). No effect was found on feelings of stress, dissatisfaction or psychological and psychosomatic complaints. However, as compared to the control group in regular day-care, the persons with dementia in the MCS Program participated for a longer period of time before they were placed in a nursing home. The MCS Program proved more effective than psychogeriatric day-care in influencing the feeling of competence of the carers, and seems to lead to an increased delay of nursing home placement of the person with dementia, as compared to regular day-care. Because of the small sample and limited power of the study, and the possible influence of the selection of carers on the study outcome, further research into the value of meeting centres for carers of people with dementia is recommended.


Subject(s)
Caregivers , Cost of Illness , Day Care, Medical , Dementia/rehabilitation , Self-Help Groups , Social Support , Aged , Family Relations , Female , Humans , Institutionalization , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Care Team
2.
Int Psychogeriatr ; 12(1): 99-115, 2000 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10798457

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study tests the hypothesis that integrated family support, in which patients and caregivers are both supported by one professional staff, is more effective in influencing behavior problems and mood of the dementia patient than nonintegrated support, such as psychogeriatric day care only. DESIGN: A quasi-experimental pretest-posttest control group design with matched groups was applied. SETTING: Psychogeriatric day-care centers of four community centers and three nursing homes. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-six dementia patients living at home and their caregivers. INTERVENTION: The patients in the experimental group (n = 33) participated together with their caregivers in an integrated family support program, whereas the patients in the control group (n = 23) received psychogeriatric day care only. MEASUREMENTS: Behavior problems and mood were observed using standardized behavior observation scales. RESULTS: After 7 months the experimental support program, compared to the regular psychogeriatric day care, showed a large positive effect on the total number of behavior problems (effect size .75), and also specifically on the degree of inactivity (effect size .66) and nonsocial behavior (effect size .61). No effect on mood was found. CONCLUSIONS: In influencing the total amount of behavior problems, as well as the degree of inactivity and nonsocial behavior, the integrated family support program proved to be more effective than psychogeriatric day care. Because behavior problems are an important determinant for admission of persons with dementia into a nursing home, integrated family support may contribute to the delay of institutionalization.


Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease/therapy , Day Care, Medical , Family/psychology , Mood Disorders/complications , Mood Disorders/therapy , Psychomotor Disorders/complications , Psychomotor Disorders/therapy , Social Support , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Alzheimer Disease/complications , Alzheimer Disease/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Severity of Illness Index
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...