ABSTRACT
Introducción: El uso del acenocumarol como anticoagulante, constituye un aporte al tratamiento de la fibrilación auricular no valvular. En la actualidad existen otros tipos de anticoagulantes que no requieren control tan exhaustivo de la prueba digital International Normaizedl Ratio y tienen menos efectos secundarios. España es uno de los pocos países de Europa que continúa indicando acenocumarol, de forma similar a la warfarina. Tanto es así, que a los médicos de atención primaria no se les permite prescribir otros anticoagulantes más eficaces y menos molestos, para el paciente al realizar la prueba digital. Objetivo: Analizar el uso inadecuado del fármaco acenocumarol en la fibrilación auricular no valvular. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio exploratorio, en un sistema de salud de atención primaria y hospitales de categoría secundaria. La población la integraron 2 650 habitantes del sureste español con fibrilación auricular no valvular, tomadores de acenocumarol con seguimiento de 12 meses. Resultados: Se consideró las variaciones y labilidad del valor International Normalized Ratio, entre 2,0-3,0 en determinaciones cada 28 días, no obstante a la enfermedad cardiovascular y cifras obtenidas respecto a las anteriores. El tiempo de seguimiento fue 12 meses y desapareció la fragilidad, se tomaron muestras cada 28 días. Antes de finalizar el estudio, desapareció la labilidad del International Normalized Ratio durante más de tres meses en 53 (97,95 %) de los pacientes. Dado que la mayoría de los enfermos que consumían acenocumarol tenían edades por encima de 65 años y estaban sometidos a régimen de poli medicación, los medicamentos que consumían, fueron motivo de evaluación. Conclusiones: El tiempo transcurrido entre la determinación del International Normaizedl Ratio y la última ingesta de alimentos y medicamentos, no fue correcto, existe tendencia a realizar determinaciones anárquicas del International Normalized Ratio, sin investigaciones relacionadas con fármacos consumidos junto al acenocumarol.
Introduction: The use of acenocoumarol as an anticoagulant represents a contribution to the treatment of non-valvular atrial fibrillation. At present, there are other types of anticoagulants that do not require such exhaustive control of the International Normalized Ratio digital test and have fewer side effects. Spain is one of the few countries in Europe that continues to prescribe acenocoumarol, which is similar to warfarin. So much so that primary care physicians are not allowed to prescribe other more effective and less troublesome anticoagulants for the patient when performing the digital test. Objective: To analyze the inappropriate use of the drug acenocoumarol in non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Methods: An exploratory study was carried out in a primary health care system and secondary category hospitals. The population consisted of 2650 inhabitants of southeastern Spain with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, taking acenocoumarol with 12 months follow-up. Results: We considered the variations and lability of the International Normalized Ratio value, between 2.0-3.0 in determinations every 28 days, regardless of cardiovascular disease and figures obtained in relation to the previous. The follow-up time was 12 months and the lability disappeared, samples were taken every 28 days. Before the end of the study, the lability of the International Normalized Ratio disappeared for more than three months in 53 (97.95%) of the patients. Since most of the patients taking acenocoumarol were over 65 years of age and on polymedication, the medications taken by each of them were evaluated. Conclusions: The time elapsed between the International Normalized Ratio determination and the last intake of food and medication was not correct, and there is a tendency to perform anarchic determinations of the International Normalized Ratio without investigations related to drugs consumed together with acenocoumarol.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: We evaluated the limitations of the ankle-brachial index (ABI) in the revascularisation of diabetic patients with critical limb ischaemia (CLI) who were undergoing peripheral transluminal angioplasty (PTA) compared with the degree of arterial stenosis and with transcutaneous oxygen tension (TcpO2). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study assessed 250 consecutive diabetic patients in whom we evaluated results of posterior tibial and dorsalis pedis Doppler, ABI, TcpO2, and duplex scans. In total, 104 patients were considered suitable candidates for PTA. RESULTS: In 42% of the patients studied, ABI could either not be used (9.34% due to no signal; 14.02% because the artery could not be compressed) or was incorrect (18.7% before PTA; 15.9% after PTA). In contrast, TcpO2 was determined in all cases. After PTA, vessel stenosis decreased from 58.33±20.07% to 21.87±13.57% (p<0.001), whereas ABI increased from 0.79±0.57 to 0.95±0.47 (p<0.001) and TcpO2 from 27.37±10.40 mmHg to 38.23±10.25 mmHg (p<0.001). A statistical analysis revealed scant correlation between techniques (TcpO2 and ABI) (r=0.14). CONCLUSIONS: ABI shows significant limitations for the diagnosing and treating CLI patients compared with TcpO2.
