ABSTRACT
Feulgen staining is considered to be a quantitative DNA-specific cytochemical procedure. The applicability of this staining in high-resolution cytometry was tested in comparison with a regressive Papanicolaou staining. Papanicolaou-stained or Feulgen-stained intermediate and carcinoma cells selected by a cytologist were examined with a Zeiss scanning microscope photometer at 546 and 560 nm, respectively. After cell image segmentation and feature extraction, a statistical data evaluation was carried out by computer. Cell distributions with respect to four selected nuclear features demonstrated the influence of the staining procedure on cell feature measurements. The discriminatory power of the classification system as related to both staining procedures was studied using discriminant analysis. Using only nuclear features, a 7.3% improvement of the overall correct classification rate (from 85.0% to 92.3%) was achieved using Feulgen staining. The misclassification rate was simultaneously reduced by 50%. Using cytoplasmic as well as nuclear features, a 98% rate of correct classification was achieved.
