Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 52
Filter
1.
J Trauma Stress ; 36(6): 1044-1055, 2023 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37851579

ABSTRACT

Research over the last few decades has demonstrated the effectiveness of various treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). However, the question of which treatment works best remains, especially for patients with PTSD stemming from childhood abuse. Using the Personalized Advantage Index (PAI), we explored which patients benefit more from phase-based treatment and which benefit more from direct trauma-focused treatment. Data were obtained from a multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing a phase-based treatment condition (i.e., eye-movement desensitization and reprocessing [EMDR] therapy preceded by Skills Training in Affect and Interpersonal Regulation [STAIR]; n = 57) and a direct trauma-focused treatment (EMDR only; n = 64) among individuals with PTSD related to childhood abuse. Machine learning techniques were used to examine all pretreatment variables included in the trial as potential predictors and moderators, with selected variables combined to build the PAI model. The utility of the PAI was tested by comparing actual posttreatment outcomes of individuals who received PAI-indicated treatment with those allocated to a non-PAI-indicated treatment. Although eight pretreatment variables between PTSD treatment outcome and treatment condition were selected as moderators, there was no significant difference between participants assigned to their PAI-indicated treatment and those randomized to a non-PAI-indicated treatment, d = 0.25, p = .213. Hence, the results of this study do not support the need for personalized medicine for patients with PTSD and a history of childhood abuse. Further research with larger sample sizes and external validation is warranted.


Subject(s)
Child Abuse , Eye Movement Desensitization Reprocessing , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic , Humans , Child , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/therapy , Treatment Outcome , Child Abuse/therapy , Eye Movement Desensitization Reprocessing/methods
2.
BMJ Open ; 10(3): e034385, 2020 03 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32209628

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Diverticulitis is among the most common abdominal disorders. The best treatment strategy for this complicated disease as well as for recurrent stages is still under debate. Moreover, little knowledge exists regarding the effect of different therapeutic strategies on the health-related quality of life (HrQoL). Therefore, the PREDIC-DIV (PREDICtors for health-related quality of life after elective sigmoidectomy for DIVerticular disease) study aims to assess predictors of a change in HrQoL in patients after elective sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A prospective multicentre transnational observational study was started in November 2017. Patients undergoing elective sigmoid resection for diverticular disease were included. Primary outcome includes HrQoL 6 months postoperatively, staged by the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI). Secondary outcomes include HrQoL 6 months after sigmoidectomy, assessed using the Short Form 36 Questionnaire and a custom-made Visual Analogue Scale-based inventory; HrQoL after 12 and 24 months; postoperative morbidity; mortality; influence of surgical technique (conventional laparoscopic multiport operation vs robotic approach); histological grading of inflammation and morphological characteristics of the bowel wall in the resected specimen; postoperative functional changes (faecal incontinence, faecal urge, completeness of emptying, urinary incontinence, sexual function); disease-specific healthcare costs; and changes in economic productivity, measured by the iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire. The total follow-up will be 2 years. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol was approved by the medical ethical committee of the Bavarian Medical Council (report identification number: 2017-177). The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The findings of this study will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal (BMJ Open, Annals of Surgery, British Journal of Surgery, Diseases of the Colon and the Rectum). Abstracts will be submitted to relevant national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The study is registered with the ClinicalTrials.gov register as NCT03527706; Pre-results.


Subject(s)
Colon, Sigmoid/surgery , Diverticular Diseases/surgery , Elective Surgical Procedures , Laparoscopy , Quality of Life , Humans , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Observational Studies as Topic , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
3.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30556649

ABSTRACT

As nanomedicines have the potential to address many currently unmet medical needs, the early identification of regulatory requirements that could hamper a smooth translation of nanomedicines from the laboratory environment to clinical applications is of utmost importance. The blood system is especially relevant as many nanomedicinal products that are currently under development are designed for intravenous administration and cells of the blood system will be among the first biological systems exposed to the injected nanomedicine. This review collects and summarizes the current knowledge related to the blood compatibility of nanomedicines and nanomaterials with a potential use in biomedical applications. Different types of nanomedicines were analyzed for their toxicity to the blood system, and the role of their physicochemical properties was further elucidated. Trends were identified related to: (a) the nature of the most frequently occurring blood incompatibilities such as thrombogenicity and complement activation, (b) the contribution of physicochemical properties to these blood incompatibilities, and (c) the similarities between data retrieved from in vivo and in vitro studies. Finally, we provide an overview of available standards that allow evaluating the compatibility of a material with the blood system. This article is categorized under: Toxicology and Regulatory Issues in Nanomedicine > Toxicology of Nanomaterials Therapeutic Approaches and Drug Discovery > Emerging Technologies Toxicology and Regulatory Issues in Nanomedicine > Regulatory and Policy Issues in Nanomedicine.


Subject(s)
Blood Cells , Drug Delivery Systems/adverse effects , Nanomedicine/standards , Nanostructures , Animals , Blood Cells/drug effects , Blood Cells/physiology , Hemolysis/drug effects , Humans , Nanostructures/adverse effects , Nanostructures/toxicity , Thrombosis/chemically induced , Toxicity Tests
4.
Toxicol In Vitro ; 42: 182-190, 2017 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28456566

ABSTRACT

The present study assesses acute and chronic toxicity of doxorubicin in human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs), with the aim to obtain in vitro biomarkers that can be used as readouts to predict in vivo cardiotoxicity. Possible acute toxicity was investigated by assessing effects on the beating rate and the field potential duration (FPD) of doxorubicin-exposed cardiomyocytes by measuring electrical activity using multi-electrode array (MEA) analyses. No effects on the beating rate and FPD were found at concentrations up to 6µM, whereas at 12µM no electrical activity was recorded, indicating that the cardiomyocytes stopped beating. Acute and chronic effects of doxorubicin on mitochondria, which have been reported to be affected in doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity, were assessed using high content imaging techniques. To this end hiPSC-CMs were exposed to 150 or 300nM doxorubicin using both single dosing (3h and 2days) and repetitive dosing (3 times, of 2days each), including washout studies to assess delayed effects (assessment at day 14) and effects on cell number, mitochondrial density, mitochondrial membrane potential, mitochondrial superoxide levels and mitochondrial calcium levels were assessed. No effects of doxorubicin were found on mitochondrial density and mitochondrial superoxide levels, whereas doxorubicin reduced cell survival and slightly altered mitochondrial membrane potential and mitochondrial calcium levels, which was most profound in the washout studies. Altogether, the results of the present study show that concentrations of doxorubicin in the micromolar range were required to affect electrical activity of hiPSC-CMs, whereas nanomolar concentrations already affected cell viability and caused mitochondrial disturbances. Integration of these data with other in vitro data may enable the selection of a series of in vitro biomarkers that can be used as readouts to screen chemicals for possible cardiotoxicity.


Subject(s)
Antibiotics, Antineoplastic/toxicity , Doxorubicin/toxicity , Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells/cytology , Myocytes, Cardiac/drug effects , Calcium/metabolism , Cells, Cultured , Humans , Membrane Potential, Mitochondrial/drug effects , Mitochondria, Heart/drug effects , Mitochondria, Heart/physiology , Myocytes, Cardiac/metabolism , Myocytes, Cardiac/physiology , Superoxides/metabolism
5.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg ; 136(4): 499-504, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26721699

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy of a conventional over-the-top-guide (OTG) with a typically short offset to hit the center of the native femoral ACL footprint through the anteromedial portal in comparison to a specific medial-portal-aimer (MPA) with larger offset. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 20 matched human cadaveric knees, insertion sites of the ACL were marked in medial arthrotomy. An OTG with an offset of 5.5 mm, respectively, the MPA with 9 mm offset was used in a medial portal approach to locate the center of a single bundle ACL reconstruction tunnel with k-wires. Distances from the footprint center, the OTG drilling and the MPA drilling to the roof of the intercondylar notch and to the deep cartilage margin were determined. After positioning of radiological markers, radiographic analysis was performed according to the quadrant technique as described by Bernard and Hertel. RESULTS: The distance from ACL origin to the roof of the notch was 10.3 (±2.1) mm, in the OTG group 6.7 (±1.5) mm and in the MPA group 9.6 (±1.9) mm. The distance to the deep cartilage margin was 9.5 (±1.7) mm from ACL origin, 4.8 (±1.3) mm with OTG and 8.7 (±1.4) mm with MPA. There were statistically significant differences between the distances of the footprint center and the OTG group after measuring and also after radiographic analysis (p < 0.0001). Using the MPA, no significant different distances in comparison to the anatomical ACL center were found (p > 0.0001). There was an increased risk for femoral blow (9/10 vs. 0/10) in the OTG group after overdrilling with a 9 mm drill. CONCLUSION: Short (5.5 mm) offset femoral aiming devices fail to locate the native ACL footprint center in medial portal approach with an increased risk for femoral blowout when overdrilling. The special medial-portal-aiming device with 9 mm offset hit the center reliably.


Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/instrumentation , Anterior Cruciate Ligament/surgery , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anterior Cruciate Ligament/anatomy & histology , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/methods , Femur/anatomy & histology , Femur/surgery , Humans , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Tibia/anatomy & histology , Tibia/surgery
6.
Arch Toxicol ; 90(11): 2763-2777, 2016 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26537877

ABSTRACT

The currently available techniques for the safety evaluation of candidate drugs are usually cost-intensive and time-consuming and are often insufficient to predict human relevant cardiotoxicity. The purpose of this study was to develop an in vitro repeated exposure toxicity methodology allowing the identification of predictive genomics biomarkers of functional relevance for drug-induced cardiotoxicity in human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs). The hiPSC-CMs were incubated with 156 nM doxorubicin, which is a well-characterized cardiotoxicant, for 2 or 6 days followed by washout of the test compound and further incubation in compound-free culture medium until day 14 after the onset of exposure. An xCELLigence Real-Time Cell Analyser was used to monitor doxorubicin-induced cytotoxicity while also monitoring functional alterations of cardiomyocytes by counting of the beating frequency of cardiomyocytes. Unlike single exposure, repeated doxorubicin exposure resulted in long-term arrhythmic beating in hiPSC-CMs accompanied by significant cytotoxicity. Global gene expression changes were studied using microarrays and bioinformatics tools. Analysis of the transcriptomic data revealed early expression signatures of genes involved in formation of sarcomeric structures, regulation of ion homeostasis and induction of apoptosis. Eighty-four significantly deregulated genes related to cardiac functions, stress and apoptosis were validated using real-time PCR. The expression of the 84 genes was further studied by real-time PCR in hiPSC-CMs incubated with daunorubicin and mitoxantrone, further anthracycline family members that are also known to induce cardiotoxicity. A panel of 35 genes was deregulated by all three anthracycline family members and can therefore be expected to predict the cardiotoxicity of compounds acting by similar mechanisms as doxorubicin, daunorubicin or mitoxantrone. The identified gene panel can be applied in the safety assessment of novel drug candidates as well as available therapeutics to identify compounds that may cause cardiotoxicity.


Subject(s)
Anthracyclines/adverse effects , Cardiotoxins/adverse effects , Drugs, Investigational/adverse effects , Myocytes, Cardiac/drug effects , Antibiotics, Antineoplastic/adverse effects , Biomarkers, Pharmacological/metabolism , Cells, Cultured , Computational Biology , Daunorubicin/adverse effects , Doxorubicin/adverse effects , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical , Gene Expression Profiling , Gene Expression Regulation/drug effects , Humans , Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells/cytology , Mitoxantrone/adverse effects , Molecular Sequence Annotation , Myocytes, Cardiac/cytology , Myocytes, Cardiac/metabolism , Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Topoisomerase II Inhibitors/adverse effects , Toxicity Tests, Chronic
7.
Toxicol Lett ; 231(1): 38-44, 2014 Nov 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25192806

ABSTRACT

A number of in vitro toxicity assays based on human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) are under development in order to provide alternative methods for the screening of chemicals and drugs and to reduce the number of animals needed for developmental toxicity assessment. The major challenge is to demonstrate the reliability of these in vitro methods by correlating the in vitro produced results to the available in vivo data. In this context transcriptomic approaches associated to toxicogenomic database analysis give the possibility to screen, annotate and cluster high numbers of genes and to identify the molecular changes that univocally mark the toxicity induced processes or are indicative of the early initiating events that lead to cellular toxicity. In this retrospective study we compare microarray transcriptomic data derived from two different hESCs lines (HUES1 and H9) exposed to valproic acid (VA) while applying the same differentiation protocol. We present the results of this comparative analysis in light of the known teratogenic effects of VA. The results show molecular changes in the processes of neural development, neural crest migration, apoptosis and regulation of transcription, indicating a good correspondence with the available in vivo data. We also describe common toxicological signatures and provide an interpretation of the observed qualitative differences referring to known biological features of the two hESCs lines.


Subject(s)
Embryonic Stem Cells/drug effects , Gene Expression Profiling/methods , Neural Stem Cells/drug effects , Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis , Toxicity Tests/methods , Transcription, Genetic/drug effects , Valproic Acid/toxicity , Apoptosis/drug effects , Apoptosis/genetics , Cell Line , Cell Movement/drug effects , Cell Movement/genetics , Cluster Analysis , Embryonic Stem Cells/metabolism , Embryonic Stem Cells/pathology , Gene Expression Regulation/drug effects , Humans , Neural Stem Cells/metabolism , Neural Stem Cells/pathology , Neurogenesis/drug effects , Neurogenesis/genetics , Principal Component Analysis , Risk Assessment
8.
Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol ; 10(1): 39-50, 2014 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24102433

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Human stem cell lines and their derivatives, as alternatives to the use of animal cells or cancer cell lines, have been widely discussed as cellular models in predictive toxicology. However, the role of stem cells in the development of long-term toxicities and carcinogenesis has not received great attention so far, despite growing evidence indicating the relationship of stem cell damage to adverse effects later in life. However, testing this in vitro is a scientific/technical challenge in particular due to the complex interplay of factors existing under physiological conditions. Current major research programs in stem cell toxicity are not aiming to demonstrate that stem cells can be targeted by toxicants. Therefore, this knowledge gap needs to be addressed in additional research activities developing technical solutions and defining appropriate experimental designs. AREAS COVERED: The current review describes selected examples of the role of stem cells in the development of long-term toxicities in the brain, heart or liver and in the development of cancer. EXPERT OPINION: The presented examples illustrate the need to analyze the contribution of stem cells to chronic toxicity in order to make a final conclusion whether stem cell toxicities are an underestimated risk in mechanism-based safety assessments. This requires the development of predictive in vitro models allowing the assessment of adverse effects to stem cells on chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity.


Subject(s)
Stem Cells/drug effects , Stem Cells/pathology , Toxicity Tests, Chronic/methods , Animals , Brain/drug effects , Brain/metabolism , Carcinogens/toxicity , Cell Differentiation/drug effects , Disease Models, Animal , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Humans , Neoplasms/chemically induced , Neoplasms/pathology
10.
Crit Rev Toxicol ; 43(10): 850-91, 2013 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24274377

ABSTRACT

The Globally Harmonised System of Classification (GHS) is a framework within which the intrinsic hazards of substances may be determined and communicated. It is not a legislative instrument per se, but is enacted into national legislation with the appropriate legislative instruments. GHS covers many aspects of effects upon health and the environment, including adverse effects upon sexual function and fertility or on development. Classification for these effects is based upon observations in humans or from properly designed experiments in animals, although only the latter is covered herein. The decision to classify a substance based upon experimental data, and the category of classification ascribed, is determined by the level of evidence that is available for an adverse effect on sexual function and fertility or on development that does not arise as a secondary non-specific consequence of other toxic effect. This document offers guidance on the determination of level of concern as a measure of adversity, and the level of evidence to ascribe classification based on data from tests in laboratory animals.


Subject(s)
Hazardous Substances/classification , Hazardous Substances/toxicity , Reproduction/drug effects , Animals , Butadienes/classification , Butadienes/toxicity , Ethanolamines/classification , Ethanolamines/toxicity , Female , Guidelines as Topic , Internationality , Male , Nitrobenzenes/classification , Nitrobenzenes/toxicity , Phthalic Acids/classification , Phthalic Acids/toxicity , Product Labeling , Toxicity Tests
11.
Arch Toxicol ; 87(1): 123-43, 2013 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23179753

ABSTRACT

Developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) and many forms of reproductive toxicity (RT) often manifest themselves in functional deficits that are not necessarily based on cell death, but rather on minor changes relating to cell differentiation or communication. The fields of DNT/RT would greatly benefit from in vitro tests that allow the identification of toxicant-induced changes of the cellular proteostasis, or of its underlying transcriptome network. Therefore, the 'human embryonic stem cell (hESC)-derived novel alternative test systems (ESNATS)' European commission research project established RT tests based on defined differentiation protocols of hESC and their progeny. Valproic acid (VPA) and methylmercury (MeHg) were used as positive control compounds to address the following fundamental questions: (1) Does transcriptome analysis allow discrimination of the two compounds? (2) How does analysis of enriched transcription factor binding sites (TFBS) and of individual probe sets (PS) distinguish between test systems? (3) Can batch effects be controlled? (4) How many DNA microarrays are needed? (5) Is the highest non-cytotoxic concentration optimal and relevant for the study of transcriptome changes? VPA triggered vast transcriptional changes, whereas MeHg altered fewer transcripts. To attenuate batch effects, analysis has been focused on the 500 PS with highest variability. The test systems differed significantly in their responses (<20 % overlap). Moreover, within one test system, little overlap between the PS changed by the two compounds has been observed. However, using TFBS enrichment, a relatively large 'common response' to VPA and MeHg could be distinguished from 'compound-specific' responses. In conclusion, the ESNATS assay battery allows classification of human DNT/RT toxicants on the basis of their transcriptome profiles.


Subject(s)
Embryonic Stem Cells/drug effects , Gene Expression Profiling , Mutagenicity Tests/methods , Neurotoxicity Syndromes/genetics , Binding Sites , Cells, Cultured , Embryonic Stem Cells/cytology , Gene Expression Regulation/drug effects , Humans , Methylmercury Compounds/toxicity , Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis , Valproic Acid/toxicity
12.
Altern Lab Anim ; 40(3): 175-81, 2012 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22943518

ABSTRACT

The use of Integrated Testing Strategies (ITS) permits the combination of diverse types of chemical and toxicological data for the purposes of hazard identification and characterisation. In November 2008, the European Partnership for Alternative Approaches to Animal Testing (EPAA), together with the European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM), held a workshop on Overcoming Barriers to Validation of Non-animal Partial Replacement Methods/Integrated Testing Strategies, in Ispra, Italy, to discuss the extent to which current ECVAM approaches to validation can be used to evaluate partial replacement in vitro test methods (i.e. as potential ITS components) and ITS themselves. The main conclusions of these discussions were that formal validation was only considered necessary for regulatory purposes (e.g. the replacement of a test guideline), and that current ECVAM approaches to validation should be adapted to accommodate such test methods. With these conclusions in mind, a follow-up EPAA-ECVAM workshop was held in October 2009, to discuss the extent to which existing validation principles are applicable to the validation of ITS test methods, and to develop a draft approach for the validation of such test methods and/or overall ITS for regulatory purposes. This report summarises the workshop discussions that started with a review of the current validation methodologies and the presentation of two case studies (skin sensitisation and acute toxicity), before covering the definition of ITS and their components, including their validation and regulatory acceptance. The following main conclusions/recommendations were made: that the validation of a partial replacement test method (for application as part of a testing strategy) should be differentiated from the validation of an in vitro test method for application as a stand-alone replacement, especially with regard to its predictive capacity; that, in the former case, the predictive capacity of the whole testing strategy (rather than of the individual test methods) would be more important, especially if the individual test methods had a high biological relevance; that ITS allowing for flexible and ad hoc approaches cannot be validated, whereas the validation of clearly defined ITS would be feasible, although practically quite difficult; and that test method developers should be encouraged to develop and submit to ECVAM not only full replacement test methods, but also partial replacement methods to be placed as parts of testing strategies. The added value from the formal validation of testing strategies, and the requirements needed in view of regulatory acceptance of the data, require further informed discussion within the EPAA forum on the basis of case studies provided by industry.


Subject(s)
Animal Testing Alternatives , Toxicity Tests/methods , Validation Studies as Topic , Animals
13.
Toxicol In Vitro ; 26(5): 727-31, 2012 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22507746

ABSTRACT

In 2011, the European Commission has restricted the use of Bisphenol A in plastic infant feeding bottles. In a response to this restriction, Bisphenol S is now often used as a component of plastic substitutes for the production of babybottles. One of the major concerns leading to the restriction of Bisphenol A was its weak estrogenic activity. By using two highly standardised transactivation assays, we could demonstrate that the estrogenic activity of Bisphenol A and Bisphenol S is of a comparable potency. Furthermore, some insights about the structure-activity relationships of these two chemicals and their metabolites could be gained from in silico predictions of their relative estrogen receptor-binding affinities and their liver phase-I biotransformation.


Subject(s)
Endocrine Disruptors/pharmacology , Estrogens, Non-Steroidal/pharmacology , Phenols/pharmacology , Benzhydryl Compounds , Binding Sites , Cell Line, Tumor , Computer Simulation , Endocrine Disruptors/metabolism , Estrogen Receptor alpha/metabolism , Estrogens, Non-Steroidal/metabolism , Humans , Phenols/metabolism , Sulfones , Transcriptional Activation/drug effects
14.
Adv Exp Med Biol ; 745: 14-25, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22437810

ABSTRACT

Embryonic stem (ES) cells undergo self-renewal and are pluripotent, i.e., they can give rise to all the types of specialised cells in the body. Scientific knowledge on ES cells is increasing rapidly, leading to opportunities for establishment of ES cell-based in vitro tests for drug discovery, preclinical safety pharmacology and toxicology. The main properties of ES cells making them useful in in vitro assays are that they have a normal diploid karyotype and can provide a large number of cells for high-throughput assays. Human ES cells additionally have the potential to provide solutions to problems related to interspecies differences and methods for screening for human polymorphisms, thus supporting robust human hazard identification and optimised drug discovery strategies. Importantly, ES cell based assays could be potential tools to reduce and perhaps replace, animal experiments. This chapter will describe ongoing research in the use of ES cells in toxicology and safety pharmacology, focusing on the major areas of progress, namely, embryotoxicology, cardiotoxicology and hepatoxicology.


Subject(s)
Embryonic Stem Cells/drug effects , Toxicity Tests/methods , Drug Discovery , Humans
15.
Adv Exp Med Biol ; 745: 154-80, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22437818

ABSTRACT

The development of alternative empirical (testing) and non-empirical (non-testing) methods to traditional toxicological tests for complex human health effects is a tremendous task. Toxicants may potentially interfere with a vast number of physiological mechanisms thereby causing disturbances on various levels of complexity of human physiology. Only a limited number of mechanisms relevant for toxicity ('pathways' of toxicity) have been identified with certainty so far and, presumably, many more mechanisms by which toxicants cause adverse effects remain to be identified. Recapitulating in empirical model systems (i.e., in vitro test systems) all those relevant physiological mechanisms prone to be disturbed by toxicants and relevant for causing the toxicity effect in question poses an enormous challenge. First, the mechanism(s) of action of toxicants in relation to the most relevant adverse effects of a specific human health endpoint need to be identified. Subsequently, these mechanisms need to be modeled in reductionist test systems that allow assessing whether an unknown substance may operate via a specific (array of) mechanism(s). Ideally, such test systems should be relevant for the species of interest, i.e., based on human cells or modeling mechanisms present in humans. Since much of our understanding about toxicity mechanisms is based on studies using animal model systems (i.e., experimental animals or animal-derived cells), designing test systems that model mechanisms relevant for the human situation may be limited by the lack of relevant information from basic research. New technologies from molecular biology and cell biology, as well as progress in tissue engineering, imaging techniques and automated testing platforms hold the promise to alleviate some of the traditional difficulties associated with improving toxicity testing for complex endpoints. Such new technologies are expected (1) to accelerate the identification of toxicity pathways with human relevance that need to be modeled in test methods for toxicity testing (2) to enable the reconstruction of reductionist test systems modeling at a reduced level of complexity the target system/organ of interest (e.g., through tissue engineering, use of human-derived cell lines and stem cells etc.), (3) to allow the measurement of specific mechanisms relevant for a given health endpoint in such test methods (e.g., through gene and protein expression, changes in metabolites, receptor activation, changes in neural activity etc.), (4) to allow to measure toxicity mechanisms at higher throughput rates through the use of automated testing. In this chapter, we discuss the potential impact of new technologies on the development, optimization and use of empirical testing methods, grouped according to important toxicological endpoints. We highlight, from an ECVAM perspective, the areas of topical toxicity, skin absorption, reproductive and developmental toxicity, carcinogenicity/genotoxicity, sensitization, hematopoeisis and toxicokinetics and discuss strategic developments including ECVAM's database service on alternative methods. Neither the areas of toxicity discussed nor the highlighted new technologies represent comprehensive listings which would be an impossible endeavor in the context of a book chapter. However, we feel that these areas are of utmost importance and we predict that new technologies are likely to contribute significantly to test development in these fields. We summarize which new technologies are expected to contribute to the development of new alternative testing methods over the next few years and point out current and planned ECVAM projects for each of these areas.


Subject(s)
Animal Testing Alternatives/methods , Toxicity Tests/methods , Animals , Carcinogenicity Tests , Dermatitis, Phototoxic/etiology , Hematopoiesis/drug effects , Humans , Irritants/toxicity , Nervous System/drug effects , Reproduction/drug effects , Skin Absorption
16.
Arch Toxicol ; 85(5): 367-485, 2011 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21533817

ABSTRACT

The 7th amendment to the EU Cosmetics Directive prohibits to put animal-tested cosmetics on the market in Europe after 2013. In that context, the European Commission invited stakeholder bodies (industry, non-governmental organisations, EU Member States, and the Commission's Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety) to identify scientific experts in five toxicological areas, i.e. toxicokinetics, repeated dose toxicity, carcinogenicity, skin sensitisation, and reproductive toxicity for which the Directive foresees that the 2013 deadline could be further extended in case alternative and validated methods would not be available in time. The selected experts were asked to analyse the status and prospects of alternative methods and to provide a scientifically sound estimate of the time necessary to achieve full replacement of animal testing. In summary, the experts confirmed that it will take at least another 7-9 years for the replacement of the current in vivo animal tests used for the safety assessment of cosmetic ingredients for skin sensitisation. However, the experts were also of the opinion that alternative methods may be able to give hazard information, i.e. to differentiate between sensitisers and non-sensitisers, ahead of 2017. This would, however, not provide the complete picture of what is a safe exposure because the relative potency of a sensitiser would not be known. For toxicokinetics, the timeframe was 5-7 years to develop the models still lacking to predict lung absorption and renal/biliary excretion, and even longer to integrate the methods to fully replace the animal toxicokinetic models. For the systemic toxicological endpoints of repeated dose toxicity, carcinogenicity and reproductive toxicity, the time horizon for full replacement could not be estimated.


Subject(s)
Animal Testing Alternatives/trends , Consumer Product Safety/legislation & jurisprudence , Cosmetics/standards , Toxicity Tests/trends , Animal Testing Alternatives/standards , Animals , Biological Availability , Carcinogenicity Tests/methods , European Union , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Reproducibility of Results , Risk Assessment/methods , Risk Assessment/trends , Skin/drug effects , Toxicity Tests/methods
17.
J Appl Toxicol ; 31(3): 191-205, 2011 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21328588

ABSTRACT

In this article, recent progress in cardiotoxicity testing based on the use of immortalized cell lines or human embryonic stem cell (hESC) derived cardiomyocytes in combination with state-of-the-art bioanalytical methods and sensors is reviewed. The focus is on hESC-derived cells and their refinement into competent testing cells, but the access and utility of other relevant cell types are also discussed. Recent developments in sensor techniques and bioanalytical approaches for measuring critical cardiotoxicity parameters are highlighted, together with aspects of data evaluation and validation. Finally, recommendations for further research are given.


Subject(s)
Heart Diseases/chemically induced , Myocytes, Cardiac/drug effects , Pluripotent Stem Cells/drug effects , Xenobiotics/toxicity , Animal Testing Alternatives , Animals , Cell Differentiation , Cell Line, Transformed , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/classification , Heart Diseases/pathology , Heart Diseases/physiopathology , Humans , Myocytes, Cardiac/metabolism , Myocytes, Cardiac/pathology , Oxygen Consumption , Pluripotent Stem Cells/cytology
18.
Reprod Toxicol ; 30(1): 73-80, 2010 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20435135

ABSTRACT

Estrogenicity of chemicals has received significant attention and is linked to endocrine-disrupting activities. However, there is a paucity of validated methods to assess estrogenicity in vitro. We have established a robust method to test estrogenic and antiestrogenic activity of compounds in vitro, as an alternative to using animal models such as the uterotrophic assay. To this end we optimized protocols to be used in combination with CALUX reporter gene assays and carried out an in house prevalidation, followed by two rounds of tests to establish transferability. Problems in the initial test with transferability were solved by isolation of a novel cell clone of the ERalpha CALUX line with greatly improved stability and luciferase levels. This cell line proved to be a very suitable and reliable predictor of estrogenicity of chemicals and was able to readily rank a range of chemicals on the basis of their EC50 values.


Subject(s)
Animal Testing Alternatives , Biological Assay/methods , Endocrine Disruptors/pharmacology , Estrogen Antagonists/pharmacology , Estrogen Receptor alpha , Estrogens/pharmacology , Genes, Reporter , Biological Assay/standards , Cell Culture Techniques , Cell Line, Tumor , Cloning, Molecular , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Estrogen Receptor alpha/agonists , Estrogen Receptor alpha/antagonists & inhibitors , Estrogen Receptor alpha/genetics , Humans , Luciferases/genetics , Reproducibility of Results
19.
Reprod Toxicol ; 30(1): 200-18, 2010 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20493943

ABSTRACT

ReProTect is a project within the 6th European Framework Program which has developed alternative methods aimed to reduce or replace animal experimentation in the field of reproductive toxicology. In its final year, a ring trial, named the "Feasibility Study", was conducted, in which 10 blinded chemicals with toxicologically well-documented profiles were analyzed by employing a test battery of 14 in vitro assays. EC(50) (half maximal effective concentration) or equivalent endpoints were determined and the test compounds were ranked relative to chemicals previously assayed in the tests of the battery. This comparative analysis together with a weight of evidence approach allowed a robust prediction of adverse effects on fertility and embryonic development of the 10 test chemicals in vivo. In summary, the vast majority of the predictions made based on the in vitro results turned out to be correct when compared to the whole animal data. The procedure used here, a nearest neighbor analysis coupled with a weight of evidence approach, may guide future activities in the field of alternative toxicity testing.


Subject(s)
Animal Testing Alternatives/methods , Endocrine Disruptors/toxicity , Endpoint Determination , Reproduction/drug effects , Animal Testing Alternatives/standards , Animal Testing Alternatives/statistics & numerical data , Animals , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Embryonic Development/drug effects , Feasibility Studies , Fertility/drug effects , In Vitro Techniques
20.
Reprod Toxicol ; 30(1): 161-99, 2010 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20399849

ABSTRACT

The selection of reference compounds is crucial for a successful in vitro test development in order to proof the relevance of the test system. This publication describes the criteria and the selection strategy leading to a list of more than 130 chemicals suitable for test development within the ReProTect project. The presented chemical inventory aimed to support the development and optimization of in vitro tests that seek to fulfill ECVAM's criteria for entering into the prevalidation. In order to select appropriate substances, a primary database was established compiling information from existing databases. In a second step, predefined selection criteria have been applied to obtain a comprehensive list ready to undergo a peer review process from independent experts with industrial, academic and regulatory background. Finally, a peer reviewed chemical list containing 13 substances challenging endocrine disrupter tests, additional 50 substances serving as reference chemicals for various tests evaluating effects on male and female fertility, and finally 61 substances were identified as known to provoke effects on the early development of mammalian offspring. The final list aims to cover relevant and specific mode/site of actions as they are known to be relevant for various substance classes. However, the recommended list should not be interpreted as a list of reproductive toxicants, because such a description requires proven associations with adverse effects of mammalian reproduction, which are subject of regulatory decisions done by involved competent authorities.


Subject(s)
Animal Testing Alternatives , Databases, Factual , Endocrine Disruptors , Fertility/drug effects , Animal Testing Alternatives/methods , Animal Testing Alternatives/standards , Endocrine Disruptors/classification , Endocrine Disruptors/standards , Endocrine Disruptors/toxicity , European Union , Female , Humans , Male , Reference Values
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...