Definition of histopathologic changes in gastroesophageal reflux disease.

A series of 71 patients with multiple measured biopsies of the gastroesophageal junctional region permitting assessment of the presence and length of different glandular epithelial types is presented. All but nine of 53 patients in whom a 24-hour pH study was performed had abnormal reflux, suggesting that endoscopic recognition of an abnormal columnar mucosa at the gastroesophageal junction sufficient to precipitate multiple-level biopsies indicates a high probability of abnormal reflux. All patients had cardiac mucosa (CM) or oxyntocardiac mucosa (OCM). CM was present in 68 of 71 patients. The prevalence of intestinal metaplasia increased with increasing CM+OCM length, and was present in all 22 patients with a CM+OCM length >2 cm and in 20 of 49 patients with a CM+OCM length <2 cm. Patients with a CM+OCM length >2 cm had a markedly higher acid exposure than patients with a CM+OCM length <2 cm. The findings suggest that the presence of CM and OCM in the junctional region are predictive of abnormal acid exposure, and that increasing OCM+CM length correlates strongly with the amount of acid exposure. The histologic finding of CM and OCM represents a sensitive histologic criterion for gastroesophageal reflux rather than normal epithelia. These diagnostic criteria represent the first useful histologic definitions for assessing the presence and severity of reflux.

The role of fundoplication in the treatment of type II paraesophageal hernia.

OBJECTIVES: The role of fundoplication in patients with pure type II paraesophageal hiatal hernia remains controversial. Conventional thinking suggests that because the lower esophageal sphincter is located within the abdomen, it is competent, and fundoplication is unnecessary. Few studies have used objective evaluation to guide the addition of an antireflux procedure. METHODS: Fifteen consecutive patients with type II paraesophageal hernia were treated between May 1991 and July 1994. All had radiographic criteria of pure type II hernias. Preoperative evaluation included upper intestinal endoscopy, esophageal manometry, and 24-hour ambulatory pH monitoring. The lower esophageal sphincter was considered incompetent if any of the following criteria were present: a resting pressure less than 7 mm Hg, an overall sphincter length less than 2 cm, or an intraabdominal length less than 1 cm. Primary symptoms responsible for surgery were related to the hernia in 73% of patients: dysphagia or postprandial abdominal pain in six patients, abdominal distension or vomiting in four patients, and bleeding in one patient. Symptoms typical of gastroesophageal reflux were present in four patients: heartburn and regurgitation in two each. RESULTS: Objective evidence of gastroesophageal reflux was present in the majority of patients. Five patients (31%) had evidence of esophageal injury: esophagitis in three patients, stricture in one, and esophageal ulcer in one. In 11 of 15 patients (69%), pathologic esophageal acid exposure was detected by 24-hour pH monitoring. Twelve patients (75%) had a defective lower esophageal sphincter, usually the result of an inadequate intraabdominal length (8/12, 66%). Hernia reduction, crural closure, and Nissen fundoplication were performed in 14 patients (one patient awaits surgery). Symptomatic relief was excellent in all cases. No patient has had hernia recurrence at an average of 14 months' follow-up (range 2 to 39 months). CONCLUSION: Objective evaluation reveals that gastroesophageal reflux accompanies type II paraesophageal hernia in a high proportion of patients, usually because of an incompetent lower esophageal sphincter. Appropriate treatment includes reduction of the hernia, crural closure, and fundoplication in most, if not all, patients.

Effect of respiratory protective equipment on exposure to asbestos fibres during removal of asbestos insulation.

Asbestos concentrations were measured within powered respirators used by workers involved in the removal of asbestos-containing insulation. Fibre concentrations within the protective gear appeared to be above the Dutch threshold limit value for crocidolite (0.2 f cm-3). Possible sources of exposure were analysed and measures were taken to improve the situation. After this, the fibre concentrations in the breathing area were reduced and were below the Dutch concentration limit.