ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Optically guided ultrasound imaging has been used in our department since 2003 in order to implement an on line correction scheme in intensity modulated radiation therapy of prostate carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The corrections observed during the initial time period of the system (17 patients) are compared to those observed more recently (10 patients). Treatment margins are calculated. RESULTS: Overall systematic errors decreased between 2003 and 2006, and are presently statistically not different from zero. Random errors remain the same (max 4.3 mm). Proposed margins are 7 mm both in lateral and longitudinal direction and 8.4 mm in anteroposterior. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound can be used for on line correction of both positioning and internal organs motion errors and allows reduction of the margins between clinical and planning volume.
Subject(s)
Abdomen/diagnostic imaging , Image Enhancement/methods , Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiotherapy, Conformal/methods , Humans , Male , Movement , Posture , Reproducibility of Results , Treatment Outcome , UltrasonographyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to determine the predictive factors of complications, to evaluate the impact of customized treatment planning on late normal tissue effects per stage, and to report disease-free survival (DFS) and local control (LC) rates. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 1970 to 1994, 642 patients were treated with radiotherapy alone for carcinoma of the intact uterine cervix. According to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) substaging, 34% were Stage I, 39% Stage II, and 27% Stage III. The analysis was divided into three periods: 1970-1978 (use of standard prescriptions),1979-1984 (implementation of individual adjustments), 1985-1994 (systematic individual adjustments). Five-year DFS, LC, and complications rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Predictive factors of complications were determined by univariate analysis using frequency tables and nonparametric t-tests. Multivariate analysis consisted of a polychotomous stepwise regression. RESULTS: The comparison of the three time periods showed a significant reduction of the external radiation dose (dose above 40 Gy in 47% of patients before 1979 vs. 36% after 1984), of the use of parametrial boost (55% vs. 39%), of the use of vaginal cylinder (28% vs. 11.5%), and of the HWT volume (combined intracavitary and external irradiation) (842 cc vs. 503 cc on average). The total sequelae/complications rate, all toxicity grades, all stages, all organs was 51%. Five-year actuarial rate per toxicity grade was: G1, 42%; G2, 23.5%; G3, 10%; G4, 3%. The three main predictive factors for rectal and bladder sequelae/complications (all toxicity grades) taking into account time period were: the increase of external radiation dose, the high dose rate at reference points, and the whole vagina brachytherapy. No G4 occurred in the third period. The rate of G3 complications dropped from 16% to 6% over time: from 5% during the first period to 0% during the third period in Stage I, from 8% to 6% in Stage II, and from 23% to 12% in Stage III. G3 currently describes a variety of clinical situations with a different impact on quality of life which justifies further refinements of definitions of late effects. In our experience the severity of G3 markedly decreased: less than one-third of G3 had a real impact on quality of life in the last period compared to more than two-thirds in the first period. Meanwhile, 5-year LC rates remained stable in Stages I and II, 91% and 85% respectively. Conversely they fell from 75% to 55% in Stage III, thus raising the problem of underdosage and/or more accurate staging with time. CONCLUSIONS: Customized treatment planning eradicated lethal complications and provided a significant decrease of G3 in all stages while maintaining high cure rates in early stages. Dose reduction should be considered with caution in Stage III.
