ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Caudal block is frequently performed to provide analgesia for hypospadias repair. Literature suggests that pudendal block provides prolonged postoperative analgesia as compared with caudal block in children between 2 and 5 years. We compared the efficacy of pudendal and caudal blocks in children less than 2 years. METHODS: 60 children scheduled for hypospadias repair received standard general anesthesia along with either pudendal or caudal block (groups of 30 each). Variables collected were demographic data, block time, operating room time, intraoperative pain medication need, pain assessment score and medication need in the recovery room and pain assessment at home. RESULT: Groups were demographically similar. No differences were observed in the following recorded times (minutes): block procedure (caudal: 9.5±4.0, pudendal: 10.6±4.1, p=0.30), anesthesia (caudal: 17.3±5.3, pudendal: 17.7±4.3, p=0.75), total OR (caudal: 171±35, pudendal: 172±41; p=0.95) and postanesthesia care unit (PACU) stay (caudal: 88±37, pudendal: 86±42; p=0.80). Additionally, no differences were observed in rescue pain medication need in the operating room (caudal: 0, pudendal: 2 (p=0.49), in PACU (caudal: 4, pudendal: 4, p=0.99), pain assessed at home, time to pain level 2 (caudal: 13.93±8.9, pudendal: 15.17±8.7), average pain scores (p=0.67) and total pain free epochs (pain level of zero) (p=0.80) in the first 24 hours. DISCUSSION: In children less than 2 years, both blocks provide comparable intraoperative and postoperative pain relief in the first 24 hours after hypospadias surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03145415.
Subject(s)
Hypospadias , Nerve Block , Pudendal Nerve , Child , Male , Humans , Child, Preschool , Hypospadias/diagnosis , Hypospadias/surgery , Nerve Block/adverse effects , Nerve Block/methods , Pain, Postoperative/diagnosis , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To compare length-based estimates of endotracheal tube (ETT) size and age-based estimates with anesthesiologist-selected ideal ETT size in children with medical conditions affecting normal growth, known as pathological short stature (PSS). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of the anesthesia database of all children undergoing tracheal intubation for any surgical procedure during a 3-year period. The anesthesiologist-selected ideal ETT size was defined as that selected and successfully used throughout the case under the supervision of a board-certified pediatric anesthesiologist. Objective criteria, such as leak test and adequate oxygenation/ventilation, were used to validate the appropriateness of the ETT chosen. For analysis, the children were classified as normal length for age versus PSS, defined as less than 5% length for age on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention growth chart. The proportions of clinically relevant predicted ETTs, within +/-0.5 mm of the anesthesiologist-selected ideal ETT size, based on both age- and length-based formulas for each group were then compared. RESULTS: Five thousand one hundred seventy-five patient records were analyzed. In children with normal stature, age-predicted ETT size was within the clinically relevant range in 89.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 88.9%-90.7%), and length-predicted ETT size was within the clinically relevant range in 92.8% (95% CI, 92.0%-93.6%). In children with PSS, age-predicted ETT size was within the clinically relevant range in 86.6% (95% CI, 84.3%-89.0%), and length-predicted ETT size was within the clinically relevant range in 92.2% (95% CI, 90.3%-94.0%). The correlation coefficient for age to anesthesiologist-selected ideal ETT size was strong for both normal and PSS patients (r = 0.91 and r = 0.93, respectively). Length was also highly correlated to actual ETT size used for both groups (r = .91). CONCLUSIONS: Length-based prediction of ETT size is at least as accurate as age-based estimation in both normal and pathologically short children.
