Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol ; 36(8): 1488-93, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25882288

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Accurate localization of the foot/leg motor homunculus is essential because iatrogenic damage can render a patient wheelchair- or bed-bound. We hypothesized the following: 1) Readers would identify the foot motor homunculus <100% of the time on routine MR imaging, 2) neuroradiologists would perform better than nonradiologists, and 3) those with fMRI experience would perform better than those without it. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-five attending-level raters (24 neuroradiologists, 11 nonradiologists) evaluated 14 brain tumors involving the frontoparietal convexity. Raters were asked to identify the location of the foot motor homunculus and determine whether the tumor involved the foot motor area and/or motor cortex by using anatomic MR imaging. Results were compared on the basis of prior fMRI experience and medical specialty by using Mann-Whitney U test statistics. RESULTS: No rater was 100% correct. Raters correctly identified whether the tumor was in the foot motor cortex 77% of the time. Raters with fMRI experience were significantly better than raters without experience at foot motor fMRI centroid predictions (13 ± 6 mm versus 20 ± 13 mm from the foot motor cortex center, P = 2 × 10(-6)) and arrow placement in the motor gyrus (67% versus 47%, P = 7 × 10(-5)). Neuroradiologists were significantly better than nonradiologists at foot motor fMRI centroid predictions (15 ± 8 mm versus 20 ± 14 mm, P = .005) and arrow placement in the motor gyrus (61% versus 46%, P = .008). CONCLUSIONS: The inability of experienced readers to consistently identify the location of the foot motor homunculus on routine MR imaging argues for using fMRI in the preoperative setting. Experience with fMRI leads to improved accuracy in identifying anatomic structures, even on routine MR imaging.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/pathology , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Motor Cortex/pathology , Neurology , Radiology , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
2.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol ; 29(3): 528-35, 2008 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18184849

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Functional MR imaging (fMRI) is used to determine preoperatively the laterality of cortical language representation along with the relationship of language areas to adjacent brain tumors. The purpose of this study was to determine whether changing the statistical threshold for different language tasks influences the language laterality index (LI) for a group of controls, patients with tumor without prior surgery, and patients with tumor and prior surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seven controls, 9 patients with tumor without prior surgery, and 4 patients with tumor and prior surgery performed verb-generation, phonemic fluency, and semantic fluency language tasks during fMRI. Interhemispheric activation differences between the left and right Broca regions of interest were determined by calculating language LIs. LIs were compared within each group, between groups, and between language tasks. Intraoperative electrocortical mapping or the presence of aphasia during postoperative neurology examinations or both were used as ground truth. RESULTS: The language LI varied as a result of statistical thresholding, presence of tumor, prior surgery, and language task. Although patients and controls followed a similar shape in the LI curve, there was no optimal P value for determining the LI. Three patients demonstrated a shift in the LI between hemispheres as a function of statistical threshold. Verb generation was the least variable task both between tasks and across groups. CONCLUSION: For preoperative patients with tumor, the LI should be examined across a spectrum of P values and a range of tasks to ensure reliability. Our data suggest that the LI may be threshold- and task-dependent, particularly in the presence of adjacent tumor.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/diagnosis , Brain Neoplasms/surgery , Cerebral Cortex/pathology , Functional Laterality , Language , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Preoperative Care/methods , Adult , Brain Mapping/methods , Differential Threshold , Female , Humans , Male , Prognosis , Risk Assessment/methods
3.
J Dairy Sci ; 90(5): 2200-10, 2007 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17430918

ABSTRACT

A total of 1,052 bacteria and 828 yeasts were isolated from the surface flora of 6 batches of Gubbeen cheese made in 1996-1997 and 2002-2003. Stability of the microflora was evaluated over time and also during ripening at 4, 10, and 16 d (batches 4, 5, and 6) or at 4, 16, 23, and 37 d (batches 1, 2, and 3). Bacteria were identified using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, repetitive extragenic palindromic-PCR, and 16S rRNA gene sequencing, and yeasts were identified by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. The bacteria included at least 17 species, of which the most common were Staphylococcus saprophyticus (316 isolates), Corynebacterium casei (248 isolates), Brevibacterium aurantiacum (187 isolates), Corynebacterium variabile (146 isolates), Microbacterium gubbeenense (55 isolates), Staphylococcus equorum/cohnii (31 isolates), and Psychrobacter spp. (26 isolates). The most common yeasts were Debaryomyces hansenii (624 isolates), Candida catenulata (135 isolates), and Candida lusitaniae (62 isolates). In all batches of cheese except batch 2, a progression of bacteria was observed, with staphylococci dominating the early stages of ripening and coryneforms the later stages. No progression of yeast was found. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis showed that several different strains of the 5 important species of bacteria were present, but generally only one predominated. The commercial strains used for smearing the cheese were recovered, but only in very small numbers early in ripening. Four species, B. aurantiacum, C. casei, C. variabile, and Staph. saprophyticus, were found on all batches of cheese, but their relative importance varied considerably. The results imply that significant variation occurs in the surface microflora of cheese.


Subject(s)
Bacteria/isolation & purification , Biodiversity , Cheese/microbiology , Yeasts/isolation & purification , Bacteria/classification , Bacteria/growth & development , Cheese/analysis , DNA Restriction Enzymes/metabolism , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field , Food Handling/methods , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics , Salts/analysis , Time Factors , Water/analysis , Yeasts/classification , Yeasts/growth & development
4.
J Appl Microbiol ; 101(3): 668-81, 2006 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16907817

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To determine the relationships between the major organisms from the cheese-making personnel and environment and the surface of a smear cheese. METHODS AND RESULTS: 360 yeast and 593 bacteria from the cheese surface, the dairy environment and the hands and arms of personnel were collected. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, repetitive sequence-based polymerase chain reaction and 16S rDNA sequencing were used for typing and identifying the bacteria, and mitochondrial DNA restriction fragment length polymorphism and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy for typing and identifying the yeast. The three most dominant bacteria were Corynebacterium casei, Corynebacterium variabile and Staphylococcus saprophyticus, which were divided into three, five and seven clusters, respectively, by macrorestriction analysis. The same clones from these organisms were isolated on the cheese surface, the dairy environment and the skin of the cheese personnel. Debaryomyces hansenii was the most dominant yeast. CONCLUSIONS: A 'house' microflora exists in the cheese plant. Although the original source of the micro-organisms was not identified, the brines were an important source of S. saprophyticus and D. hansenii and, additionally, the arms and hands of the workers the sources of C. casei and C. variabile. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: This is the first time that the major contribution of the house microflora to the ripening of a smear-ripened cheese has been demonstrated.


Subject(s)
Cheese/microbiology , Food Microbiology , Biodiversity , Colony Count, Microbial/methods , Corynebacterium/genetics , Corynebacterium/isolation & purification , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , DNA, Mitochondrial/genetics , DNA, Ribosomal/genetics , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field/methods , Food Handling/methods , Food Industry , Gram-Positive Bacteria/genetics , Gram-Positive Bacteria/isolation & purification , Humans , Phenotype , Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length , Skin/microbiology , Staphylococcus/genetics , Staphylococcus/isolation & purification , Workplace , Yeasts/genetics , Yeasts/isolation & purification
5.
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol ; 51(Pt 3): 843-852, 2001 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11411705

ABSTRACT

Ten isolates each of two different bacterial species isolated from the surface of a smear-ripened cheese were found to exhibit many characteristics of the genus Corynebacterium. The isolates were Gram-positive, catalase-positive, non-spore-forming rods that did not undergo a rod/coccus transformation when grown on complex media. Chemotaxonomic investigation revealed that the strains belonged unambiguously to the genus Corynebacterium. Their cell walls contained arabinose, galactose and short-chain mycolic acids (C22 to C36) and their peptidoglycan contained meso-diaminopimelic acid. The G+C content of the DNA was 51-60 mol%. MK-9 (H2) was the principal menaquinone. The 16S rDNA sequences of four isolates of each bacterium were determined and aligned with those of other members of the coryneform group. Phylogenetic analysis showed that the strains represented two new sublines within the genus Corynebacterium; Corynebacterium variabile and Corynebacterium ammoniagenes were their nearest known phylogenetic neighbours. Corynebacterium variabile and Corynebacterium ammoniagenes showed the highest levels of sequence homology with the isolates; however, DNA-DNA hydridization studies indicated that the Corynebacterium strains isolated from the cheese smear did not belong to either Corynebacterium variabile or Corynebacterium ammoniagenes (26 and 46% chromosomal similarity, respectively). On the basis of the phylogenetic and phenotypic distinctiveness of the unknown isolates, it is proposed that the bacteria be classified as two new Corynebacterium species, for which the names Corynebacterium mooreparkense sp. nov. and Corynebacterium casei sp. nov. are proposed. Type strains have been deposited in culture collections as Corynebacterium mooreparkense LMG S-19265T (= NCIMB 30131T) and Corynebacterium casei LMG S-19264T (= NCIMB 30130T).


Subject(s)
Cheese/microbiology , Corynebacterium/classification , Corynebacterium/genetics , Phylogeny , Biomass , Corynebacterium/isolation & purification , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , DNA, Ribosomal/genetics , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field , Food Handling , Molecular Sequence Data , RNA, Bacterial/genetics , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics
6.
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol ; 51(Pt 6): 1969-1976, 2001 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11760936

ABSTRACT

Phenotypic and phylogenetic studies were performed on 11 strains of a Microbacterium-like organism isolated from the surface of a smear-ripened cheese. The isolates were Gram-positive, catalase-positive, facultatively anaerobic, oxidase-negative, non-spore-forming, non-motile, small, slender rods and grew in 12% (w/v) NaCl. Chemotaxonomic investigation revealed that all the isolates belonged unambiguously to the genus Microbacterium. They contained type B1 peptidoglycans with L-lysine as the diamino acid and glycolyl acyl types; rhamnose and galactose were the cell wall sugars. The G+C content ranged from 69 to 72 mol%. The major menaquinones were MK-11 and MK-12 and the major fatty acids were anteiso C15:0 and C17:0 and iso C16:0. Phylogenetic analysis of the 16S rRNA sequences of four isolates showed that they represented a new subline in the genus Microbacterium, with Microbacterium barkeri as their nearest phylogenetic neighbour. M. barkeri showed the highest sequence similarity to the isolates; however, DNA-DNA hybridization showed that the isolates had only 38% chromosomal similarity to M. barkeri. Based on the phylogenetic and phenotypic distinctiveness of the isolates, it is proposed that they be classified as a new Microbacterium species, for which the name Microbacterium gubbeenense sp. nov. is suggested. The type strain has been deposited as LMG S-19263T (= NCIMB 30129T). The GenBank accession number for the 16S rDNA sequence of the type strain is AF263563.


Subject(s)
Actinomycetales/classification , Cheese/microbiology , Actinomycetales/chemistry , Actinomycetales/genetics , Actinomycetales/isolation & purification , Base Composition , Cell Wall/chemistry , DNA, Ribosomal/genetics , Food Microbiology , Molecular Sequence Data , Phenotype , Phylogeny , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics , Sequence Analysis, DNA
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...