ABSTRACT
Cesarean births and associated morbidity and mortality have reached near epidemic proportions. The National Partnership for Maternal Safety under the guidance of the Council on Patient Safety in Women's Health Care responded by developing a patient safety bundle to reduce the number of primary cesarean births. Safety bundles outline critical practices to implement in every maternity unit. This National Partnership for Maternity Safety bundle, as with other bundles, is organized into four domains: Readiness, Recognition and Prevention, Response, and Reporting and Systems Learning. Bundle components may be adapted to individual facilities, but standardization within an institution is advised. Evidence-based resources and recommendations are provided to assist implementation.
Subject(s)
Cesarean Section/statistics & numerical data , Maternal Health , Patient Safety/standards , Pregnancy Outcome , Safety Management/organization & administration , Vaginal Birth after Cesarean/statistics & numerical data , Adult , California , Cesarean Section/methods , Consensus , Delivery, Obstetric/methods , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Vaginal Birth after Cesarean/methodsABSTRACT
Cesarean births and associated morbidity and mortality have reached near epidemic proportions. The National Partnership for Maternal Safety under the guidance of the Council on Patient Safety in Women's Health Care responded by developing a patient safety bundle to reduce the number of primary cesarean births. Safety bundles outline critical practices to implement in every maternity unit. This National Partnership for Maternity Safety bundle, as with other bundles, is organized into four domains: Readiness, Recognition and Prevention, Response, and Reporting and Systems Learning. Bundle components may be adapted to individual facilities, but standardization within an institution is advised. Evidence-based resources and recommendations are provided to assist implementation.
Subject(s)
Cesarean Section/standards , Patient Care Bundles/methods , Patient Safety/standards , Prenatal Care/methods , Delivery, Obstetric/methods , Delivery, Obstetric/standards , Female , Humans , Patient Care Bundles/standards , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/diagnosis , Pregnancy Complications/therapy , Prenatal Care/standardsABSTRACT
Cesarean births and associated morbidity and mortality have reached near epidemic proportions. The National Partnership for Maternal Safety under the guidance of the Council on Patient Safety in Women's Health Care responded by developing a patient safety bundle to reduce the number of primary cesarean births. Safety bundles outline critical practices to implement in every maternity unit. This National Partnership for Maternity Safety bundle, as with other bundles, is organized into four domains: Readiness, Recognition and Prevention, Response, and Reporting and Systems Learning. Bundle components may be adapted to individual facilities, but standardization within an institution is advised. Evidence-based resources and recommendations are provided to assist implementation.
Subject(s)
Cesarean Section , Clinical Protocols/standards , Patient Safety , Pregnancy Complications , Consensus , Female , Hospitals , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Intention , Pregnancy , Risk AssessmentABSTRACT
In the United States, rates of severe maternal morbidity and mortality have escalated in the past decade. Communication failure among members of the health care team is one associated factor that can be modified. Nurses can promote effective communication. We provide strategies that incorporate team training principles and structured communication processes for use by providers and health care systems to improve the quality and safety of patient care and reduce the incidence of maternal mortality and morbidity.
Subject(s)
Communication , Maternal Mortality , Patient Care Team , Delivery of Health Care , HumansABSTRACT
In 2005, a protocol for patients with bronchiolitis in the pediatric unit was created, but compliance was less than desired. Therefore, revisions based on staff feedback and current literature were implemented in 2007. A pre- and post-implementation design was used. Descriptive statistics were used to measure the following variables: use of protocol, frequency of suctioning, use of beta2 agonist medication, length of stay, and charges per case. A chart review was used. After implementing the revised protocol, improvement in all areas was demonstrated. Protocol use went from 20% to 68%; suctioning per protocol went from 9% to 66%, beta2-agonist medication use dropped from 70% to 48% (desired change). Financial measures also showed improvement; a decrease in length of stay (2.23 from 3.25 days), and a decrease in charges of $1000/case were demonstrated.
Subject(s)
Bronchiolitis/therapy , Bronchiolitis/virology , Clinical Protocols , Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists/therapeutic use , Bronchiolitis/drug therapy , Child , Humans , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections/drug therapy , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections/therapyABSTRACT
Unplanned or accidental extubations (UPEs) showed little improvement until the clamp method of fixation of endotracheal tubes was selected.
Subject(s)
Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Intubation, Intratracheal/adverse effects , Intubation, Intratracheal/methods , Respiration, Artificial/methods , Birth Weight , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Assessment of inpatient asthma management has generally been limited to urban settings, including Chicago, which is known for its high asthma morbidity and mortality. Previously published data have been based on survey methodology. The Suburban Asthma Consortium (SAC) sought to obtain patient-based data unique to the Chicago suburbs to improve asthma care in those areas. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate current inpatient asthma management based on the 1997 National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP). DESIGN: Retrospective chart review of all hospitalized patients 3-65 years bearing asthma-related ICD-9 codes for fiscal year 2002 in community, nonteaching hospitals in Chicago suburbs. RESULTS: Nine hundred two cases were submitted from seven hospitals. The majority ( > or = 75%) received inhaled bronchodilators, systemic steroids, oxygen and pulse oximetry. Antibiotic use (67%), chest radiography (85%), complete blood count (77%), and electrolytes (59%) appeared excessive in view of NAEPP recommendations. Peak flow monitoring (PFM) was recorded on admission in 45% of patients 5 years old and older; 52% had PFM during hospitalization. Thirty-eight percent of patients were taking ICS prior to admission; of those not on ICS, only 12% were newly diagnosed asthmatics. Overall, 51% of patients were discharged with ICS. Patients were more likely to receive ICS at discharge if they had required intensive care (ICU), had been on ICS prior to admission, were referred to an asthma specialist while hospitalized, or were insured. Patients with Medicare/Medicaid (MC/MA) had more repeat emergency visits and hospitalizations, longer lengths of stay, and received less ICS at discharge. Depending on the parameter, 41% or less patients received discharge planning education and were not more likely to have received education if in the ICU. Results ranged significantly between hospitals for most parameters (p < 0.05 or less). CONCLUSION: Study subjects received appropriate acute therapy and oxygen monitoring, but there was a divergence from NAEPP recommendations regarding PFM, ICS use, antibiotics, and laboratory evaluation. Patients receiving MC/MA experienced higher morbidity and received less ICS. Discharge asthma education was suboptimal for most hospitals. Most parameters demonstrated significantly wide practice variations between hospitals. Peak flow monitoring and patient education findings differed significantly from those in survey-conducted studies.
Subject(s)
Asthma , Suburban Population , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Asthma/diagnosis , Asthma/epidemiology , Asthma/therapy , Child , Child, Preschool , Disease Management , Drug Utilization , Female , Guideline Adherence , Hospitals, Community/organization & administration , Humans , Illinois/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Education as Topic/organization & administration , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Quality Assurance, Health Care/organization & administration , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Hearing loss is one of the most common major birth defects, yet the average age for identifying significant hearing loss in children in the United States is 30 months. Hearing loss directly affects a child's ability to develop normal language skills, impairs his or her ability to communicate with others in the environment, and has been shown to correlate with poor academic performance. However, if hearing loss is detected early and interventions are begun before 6 months of age, children with hearing loss develop language, cognitive, and speech skills comparable to their non-hearing-impaired peers. Only 38 states mandate universal newborn hearing screening before discharge from the hospital. This article describes an institutional universal hearing screening program developed by nursing, which collaborated with physicians, audiologists, and otolaryngologists. Careful planning, including a thorough literature review, networking with area hospitals, and dialoging with experts in the field led to a successful program.The outcomes from this program compare favorably to nationally published data.
