Postpartum Contraception: a Comparative Study of Berlin Women with and without Immigration Background.

Research Questions: Are there differences in postpartum contraceptive use between women with and without immigration background? Do women more commonly use contraception following a high-risk pregnancy or caesarean section? What role does current breastfeeding play and, amongst immigrants, what is the effect of acculturation level on the frequency of contraceptive use? Study Population and Methods: Data collection was carried out as part of a larger study in three Berlin delivery units using standardised interviews (questionnaires covering e.g. sociodemographics, immigration history/acculturation and use of antenatal care); telephone interviews comprising 6 questions on postpartum contraception, breastfeeding and postpartum complications were conducted on a sample of the study population six months after delivery. Results: 247 women with, and 358 women without a background of immigration were included in the study (total study population n = 605, response rate 81.1 %). 68 % of 1st generation immigrants, 87 % of 2nd/3rd generation women and 73 % of women without immigration background (non-immigrants) used contraception. In the logistical regression analysis 1st generation immigrants were less likely than non-immigrants to be using contraception six months postpartum, and 1st generation immigrants with low acculturation level were significantly less likely to use contraception than 2nd/3rd generation women with low acculturation level. Conclusion: In the extended postpartum period there was no major difference in contraceptive use between immigrants in general and non-immigrants. It remains unclear whether the differing contraceptive behaviour of 1st generation immigrants is the result of less access to information, sociocultural factors or differing contraceptive requirements and further targeted, qualitative study is required.

[Are women with and without migration background reached equally well by health services? The example of antenatal care in Berlin]. / Werden Frauen mit und ohne Migrationshintergrund von den Gesundheitsdiensten gleich gut erreicht? : Das Beispiel Schwangerenvorsorge in Berlin.

BACKGROUND: About 20% of the population in Germany has a migration background (1st generation: immigrated themselves; 2nd generation: offspring of immigrants), which can be associated with health differentials. We assessed whether differentials in uptake of antenatal care (ANC) observed in earlier studies still persist today. METHODS: Data collection in 3 obstetric hospitals in Berlin, Germany, over a 1-year period 2011/2012. We conducted standardised interviews before delivery and linked the data to routinely collected perinatal data and to data from participants' antenatal cards. We checked for confounders using regression models. RESULTS: Of the 7100 study participants (response 89.6%), 57.9% had a migration background. First ANC attendance occurred in pregnancy weeks 3-19 in 92.1% of 1st generation immigrants vs. 97.8% of non-immigrants (mean week of first attendance: 1st generation immigrants with residence < 5 years: 13.0; 5+ years: 9.9; non-immigrants 9.7). A low ANC utilisation with ≤ 5 visits was found in 644 women (9.1%). Among the non-immigrants there were 7.1% low users, among 1st generation immigrants 11.8% (among women with no German language skills 33.0%, however). Uptake of non-medical support measures was lower among women with migration background. DISCUSSION: In our sample from Berlin, migration background had little effect on ANC uptake. Neither own migration nor low acculturation were independent risk factors for late onset or low utilisation of ANC. However, a small subgroup of women with a short duration of residence in Germany and with German language problems had a lower chance of timely onset and sufficient participation in ANC. This group needs special attention.

Comparison of Perinatal Data of Immigrant Women of Turkish Origin and German Women - Results of a Prospective Study in Berlin.

Aims: The aim of the study was to compare obstetrical process indicators and outcomes for German women with women of Turkish origin residing in Germany. Do women of Turkish origin attend antenatal examinations as frequently as non-immigrant women? Are high-risk pregnancies and anemia more common among immigrant women? Are the rates for epidural analgesia (PDA) and combined spinal-epidural analgesia (CSE) during delivery the same for immigrant women compared to German women? Are there identifiable differences in the mode of delivery and in perinatal outcomes? Patient Population/Methods: Data were obtained from 3 maternity clinics in Berlin for the period 2011 to 2012. The questionnaires covered socio-demographic factors and information on prenatal care as well as immigration/acculturation. The data obtained from these questionnaires was supplemented by information obtained from the official maternal record of prenatal and natal care (Mutterpass) and perinatal data recorded by the clinic. Results: The response rate was 89.6 %; the data of 1277 women of Turkish origin who had immigrated to Germany or whose family had immigrated and of 2991 non-immigrant women in Germany were included in the study. Regression analysis showed no statistically significant difference in the number of antenatal examinations between immigrant and non-immigrant women. Women of Turkish origin born in Germany had a significantly higher risk of postpartum anemia. PDA/CSE rate, arterial umbilical cord pH and 5-minute Apgar scores did not differ. The incidence of cesarean sections (elective and secondary) was significantly lower in the population of immigrant women of Turkish origin. Conclusion: Outcomes for most perinatal parameters were comparable for immigrant and non-immigrant women. These results indicate that the achieved standards of antenatal care and medical care during pregnancy are similar for Turkish immigrant women compared to non-immigrant women in maternity clinics in Berlin. The higher rates of anemia among immigrant women should be targeted by preventive measures.