Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Pharm Biomed Anal ; 148: 369-379, 2018 Jan 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29111492

ABSTRACT

Imidazoquinoxaline derivatives (imiqualines) are a new series of anticancer compounds. Two lead compounds (EAPB0203 and EAPB0503) with remarkable in vitro and in vivo activity on melanoma and T-cell lymphomas have been previously identified. The modulation of the chemical structure of the most active compound, EAPB0503, has led to the synthesis of two compounds, EAPB02302 and EAPB02303, 7 and 40 times more active than EAPB0503 against A375 human melanoma cancer cell line, respectively. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a sensitive and accurate liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry method to simultaneously quantify EAPB02303 and its potential active metabolite, EAPB02302, in rat and mouse plasma. Analytes were detected in multiple reaction monitoring acquisition mode using an electrospray ionization detector in positive ion mode. Following a liquid-liquid extraction with ethyl acetate, analytes and internal standard were separated by HPLC reversed-phase on a C18 RP18 Nucleoshell column (2.7µm, 4.6×100mm). The method was validated according to FDA and EMA Bioanalytical Method Validation guidelines. The robustness of the method was assessed by introducing small variations in nine nominal analytical parameters. Statistical interpretation was performed by mean of the Student's t-test. Standard curves were generated via unweighted quadratic regression of calibrators (EAPB02303: 1.95-1000ng/mL, EAPB02302: 7.81-1000ng/mL in rat plasma; EAPB02303: 0.98-1000ng/mL, EAPB02302: 1.95-1000ng/mL in mouse plasma). From the analysis of QC samples, intra- and inter-assay precision and accuracy studies demonstrated %R.S.Ds. <12.5% and percent deviation from nominal concentration <7%. Matrix effects (mean matrix factors from 91.8-108.5% in rat plasma; and from 90.4-102.4% in mouse plasma) and stability assays (recoveries >87%) were acceptable and in accordance with the guidelines. No quantifiable carryover effect was observed. The LLOQs were 1.95ng/mL for EAPB02303 and 7.81ng/mL for EAPB02302 in rat plasma, and 0.98ng/mL and 1.95ng/mL for the two compounds in mouse plasma, respectively. This method was successfully implemented to support a mouse pharmacokinetic study following a single intraperitoneal administration of EAPB02303 in male C57Bl/6 mice. The obtained pharmacokinetic parameters of EAPB02303 would be useful to optimize the dosing and the rhythm of administration for subsequent preclinical in vivo activity studies.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/blood , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Plasma/chemistry , Animals , Cell Line, Tumor , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid/methods , Humans , Liquid-Liquid Extraction/methods , Male , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Quinoxalines/blood , Quinoxalines/pharmacokinetics , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization/methods , Tandem Mass Spectrometry/methods
2.
J Pharm Biomed Anal ; 131: 33-39, 2016 Nov 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27521987

ABSTRACT

Urolithins are microflora human metabolites of dietary ellagic acid derivatives. There is now a growing interest in the biological activities of these compounds. Several studies suggest that urolithins have potential antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anticancer and anti-glycative activities. Recently, our group investigated the role of urolithins as potential anti-diabetic treatments; among the four urolithins, urolithin C was the most promising compound. The purpose of this paper was to develop a rapid, sensitive and specific liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-ESI-MS/MS) method for the determination of urolithin C in rat plasma. To date, no method is reported for the quantification of urolithin C in any of the matrices. Plasma samples were extracted with ethyl acetate. Urolithin D was selected as the internal standard. The separation was carried out on a C18 Kinetex EVO column (2.1mm×150mm, 2.6µm) using a mobile phase of acetonitrile-1% aqueous formic acid solution (30:70, v/v). A triple quadrupole mass spectrometer in the negative ion mode was used for the determination of the target analyte. The monitored ion transitions were m/z 243→187 for urolithin C and m/z 259→213 for the internal standard. The calibration curve range was 4.95-1085µg/L (r2>0.994). The intra- and inter-day precisions were less than 10%; accuracies ranged from 96.6 to 109%. The mean extraction recovery of urolithins C and D was greater than 91%. No significant matrix effects and no carryover effects were observed. Small changes in LC-ESI-MS/MS conditions did not have significant effect on the determination of urolithin C. Stability tests under various conditions were also investigated. This highly specific and sensitive method was used to analyze samples collected during preclinical pharmacokinetic studies in rats. Glucuronyl and sulfate conjugates of urolithin C were the main metabolites detected in plasma.


Subject(s)
Hydrolyzable Tannins/blood , Hydrolyzable Tannins/pharmacokinetics , Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization/methods , Tandem Mass Spectrometry/methods , Animals , Chromatography, Liquid/methods , Chromatography, Liquid/standards , Male , Rats , Rats, Wistar , Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization/standards , Tandem Mass Spectrometry/standards
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...