Epidemiology of Group A Streptococcal bacteraemia in Hunter New England Local Health District, 2008 to 2019.

Invasive Group A Streptococcal infection (iGAS) is an uncommon but serious infection with Streptococcus pyogenes in a normally sterile body site. Manifestations include bacteraemia, necrotising fasciitis and toxic shock syndrome with attendant serious morbidity and mortality. An increasing incidence of iGAS has been observed in some regions of Australia. iGAS became a nationally notifiable condition from 1 July 2021. To determine if regional incidence has increased, and to identify priority populations, we undertook a retrospective data analysis of Group A Streptococcal (GAS) bacteraemia cases in Hunter New England Local Health District (HNELHD), New South Wales, Australia, from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2019, as identified by NSW Health Pathology, John Hunter Hospital. A total of 486 cases were identified (age-standardised rate: 4.05 cases per 100,000 population per year). Incidence in HNELHD gradually increased over the study period (adjusted incidence rate ratio: 1.04; 95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.07) and was significantly higher in children under 5 years of age; in adults over 70 years of age; in males; and in First Nations peoples. A significant peak occurred in 2017 (9.00 cases per 100,000 population), the cause of which remains unclear. GAS bacteraemia is uncommon but severe, and incidence in HNELHD has slowly increased. Public health and clinical guidelines must address the needs of priority populations, which include young children, older adults and First Nations peoples. Routine surveillance and genomic analysis will help improve our understanding of iGAS and inform best public health management.

Embedding Aboriginal cultural governance, capacity, perspectives and leadership into a local Public Health Unit Incident Command System during COVID-19 in New South Wales, Australia.

This case study describes the development and implementation of a governance structure that prioritised First Nations peoples in a local public health Incident Command System activated for the COVID-19 pandemic response in New South Wales, Australia. Using lessons learnt from past pandemics and planning exercises, public health leaders embedded an approach whereby First Nations peoples determined and led community and culturally informed pandemic control strategies and actions.In March 2020, First Nations governance was embedded into the local public health emergency response to COVID-19 in the Hunter New England region of New South Wales, Australia, enabling First Nations staff and community members to actively participate in strategic and operational decision-making with the objective of minimising COVID-19-related risks to First Nations peoples and communities. The model provided cultural insight and oversight to the local COVID-19 response; strengthened and advanced First Nations leadership; increased the First Nations public health workforce; led the development of First Nations disease surveillance strategies; and supported working groups to appropriately respond to local needs and priorities. This model demonstrates the feasibility of reframing a standard Incident Command System to embed and value First Nations principles of self-determination and empowerment to appropriately plan and respond to public health emergencies.

Evaluating a train-the-trainer model for scaling-up Healthy Conversation Skills training: A pre-post survey using the Theoretical Domains Framework.

OBJECTIVES: Healthy Conversation Skills (HCS) training is an established method of upskilling health professionals in person-centred behaviour change communication. A Train-the-Trainer (TtT) model was adopted to scale-up delivery of HCS training. This study examined the impact of the TtT course on new Trainers' perceived barriers and enablers to delivering HCS training using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). METHODS: The TtT course was delivered in 2019-2020. Pre-training (T1) and post-training (T2) surveys collected data on barriers and enablers to delivering HCS training based on 10 TDF domains. Data were summarised using descriptive statistics, and differences between pre- and post-training scores analysed using paired t-tests. RESULTS: Forty-six trainees participated, including 43 women and 10 Aboriginal people. Scores for nine domains increased post-training, including knowledge, skills, social and professional role/identity, beliefs about capabilities, intentions, goals, environmental context and resources, social influences, and behavioural regulation. Knowledge, beliefs about consequences and intentions were no longer barriers to delivering HCS training after participating in the TtT course. CONCLUSIONS: The TtT model supports new Trainers by addressing barriers to delivering HCS training. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The HCS TtT model builds healthcare workforce capacity for person-centred approaches to behaviour change. The findings facilitate the refinement of the TtT course.