Tumor control of locally advanced prostate cancer following combined estramustine, vinblastine, and radiation therapy.

PURPOSE: A prospective phase II study was carried out to determine whether estramustine phosphate (EMP) plus vinblastine (VBL) in combination with radiotherapy (RT) would improve the control of locally advanced prostate cancer. The rationale for combining EMP plus VBL with RT was based on the clinical and radiobiological data that EMP plus VBL acted as an excellent radiation sensitizer in cultured human prostatic carcinoma cells with the property of tissue selectivity. The combined EMP and VBL were well tolerated in the phase II clinical study of patients with advanced prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 1991 and July 1996, 65 patients, stage T2 (B2) through stage T4 (D1), were entered into the study. Gleason pattern scores ranged from 4 to 10. Pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was as follows: < 20 in 21 patients (32%), 20 to 50 in 23 patients (35%), and > 50 in 21 patients (32%). The median age was 70 years (55-83). All patients were treated with megavoltage beam radiation with a total tumor dose of 65 to 70 Gy. Oral EMP 450 mg/m2 daily and VBL 3 mg/m2 weekly were given concomitantly in 46 patients during the 7- to 7 1/2-week course of radiotherapy. RESULTS: All patients showed prompt and complete tumor regression on digital rectal examination at 6 weeks following the completion of treatment. Median follow-up time is 43 months (3-65). PSA fell to an undetectable level by 6 weeks in 56 of 65 patients (86%). For the whole group at 5 years clinical control was 81%, but biochemical control (PSA < 4 ng/mL) was 48%. The likelihood of being free of biochemical relapse at 5 years was a function of initial PSA value (PSA < 20 in 64% of the cases, 21-50 in 60%, and > 50 in 0%). The biochemical-relapse-free survival at 5 years for each stage was T2, 49%; T3, 38%; and T4, 17%. In particular, a group of patients with pretreatment PSA levels of 20 to 50 ng/mL responded quite favorably to the present combined regimen in that only 40% of the patients showed a biochemical failure at 5 years, considering the high level of initial PSA. CONCLUSIONS: The present combined approach is effective in achieving a high rate of tumor control with no disproportionately enhanced side effects. The rapid regression of the tumor nodules and sustained freedom from biochemical relapse suggest excellent long-term tumor control, especially in the group of patients with pretreatment PSA levels of 20 to 50 ng/mL.

A randomized, double-blind comparison of intravenous ondansetron alone and in combination with intravenous dexamethasone in the prevention of high-dose cisplatin-induced emesis.

PURPOSE: This study compares the efficacy and safety of ondansetron alone with that of ondansetron plus dexamethasone in the prevention of emesis induced by high-dose cisplatin (> or = 100 mg/m2). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multicenter study used a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group design. Chemotherapy-naive patients were randomized to receive intravenous (IV) ondansetron (Zofran, Cerenex Pharmaceuticals, Research Triangle Park, NC) 0.15 mg/kg for three doses every 4 hours beginning 30 minutes before cisplatin administration either alone or in combination with dexamethasone 20 mg administered 45 minutes before cisplatin. Cisplatin (> or = 100 mg/m2) was administered as a single infusion (< or = 3 hours). Patients were monitored for emetic episodes (EEs), adverse events, and laboratory safety parameters for 24 hours after cisplatin administration. RESULTS: A total of 275 patients were enrolled. Of these, 245 were assessable for efficacy. Patients who received ondansetron plus dexamethasone had a higher complete antiemetic response rate (61% v 46%, P = .02) and less nausea (posttreatment visual analog scale mean 18.2 v 32.8, P < .001) than did those who received ondansetron alone. The time to the first EE was longer for patients in the group that received ondansetron plus dexamethasone (P = .005). Headache (12%), diarrhea (2%), and abdominal colic (1%) were the most common antiemetic-related adverse events reported. The incidence of adverse events was similar between the treatment groups. CONCLUSION: IV ondansetron in combination with dexamethasone is safe and more effective than ondansetron alone in the prevention of emesis induced by high-dose cisplatin.

Serotonin uptake by progeny of murine megakaryocyte precursors (CFU-M) in vitro.

Normal megakaryocytes take up and store serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine) (5-HT). Murine megakaryocyte colonies were grown in plasma clot cultures, labeled autoradiographically with 3H-5-HT-creatinine sulfate, and stained for acetylcholinesterase. Silver granules representing serotonin uptake were present over almost all acetylcholinesterase-positive cells, including both mature megakaryocytes and smaller mononuclear cells. There was no evidence of serotonin accumulation in non-acetylcholinesterase staining granulocytic, monocytic, or erythroid cells. The results of this study provide: (a) a new label to identify murine megakaryocytes and smaller mononuclear megakaryocyte precursors (progeny of CFU-M) in plasma clot cultures, (b) further evidence that immature acetylcholinesterase-positive megakaryocyte precursor cells possess the ability to take up and store serotonin, and (c) evidence that this function of megakaryocytes and megakaryocyte precursors is preserved in the artificial environment of plasma clot cultures.

Phase II trial of ICRF-187 in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

A phase II trial of ICRF-187 (1.0 g/m2/48 hours by continuous infusion every 3 weeks) was conducted in 25 patients with advanced squamous cell cancer of the head and neck. There were two partial responders for an overall response rate of 8%. Sixteen of the patients had not received prior chemotherapy and both responding patients were in this group. The major side effect of ICRF-187 was reversible leukopenia.