ABSTRACT
Airway hysteresis can be evaluated by comparing maximal (MEFV) and partial (PEFV) expiratory flow-volume curves. The maneuvers are often obtained from pulmonary function systems that are subject to gas-compression artifacts. Because gas-compression artifacts might differentially affect PEFV vs. MEFV curves, we simultaneously obtained MEFV and PEFV curves by use of a spirometer and a volume-displacement plethysmograph (a method not subject to gas-compression artifacts) in normal and asthmatic subjects. Plethysmographic flow rates exceeded spirometric flow rates on all MEFV and PEFV maneuvers. When maximal flow exceeded partial flow (or vice versa) in the plethysmograph, the same result was virtually always observed for spirometric measurements. Alveolar pressure (PA) was higher on MEFV than on PEFV maneuvers in asthmatic subjects; comparisons between PA (on PEFV and MEFV maneuvers) in normal subjects varied at different lung volumes. Ratios of Vmax on PEFV maneuvers to Vmax on MEFV maneuvers (Vmax-p/Vmax-c) obtained from a volume-displacement plethysmograph differ quantitatively from ratios determined in systems subject to gas-compression artifacts; qualitatively, however, failure to account for thoracic gas compression ordinarily will not influence the ability to identify airway hysteresis (or lack thereof) by use of Vmax-p-to-Vmax-c ratios.
