Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Arch Dermatol ; 143(8): 991-8, 2007 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17709657

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of travel distance and other sociodemographic factors on access to a diagnosing provider for patients with melanoma. DESIGN: Analysis was performed of all incident cases of melanoma in 2000 from 42 North Carolina counties. SETTING: Academic research. PARTICIPANTS: Patients and providers from 42 North Carolina counties were geocoded to street address. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Associations between Breslow thickness and clinical and sociodemographic factors (age, sex, poverty rate, rurality, provider supply, and distance to diagnosing provider) were examined. RESULTS: Of 643 eligible cases, 4.4% were excluded because of missing data. The median Breslow thickness was 0.6 mm (range, 0.1-20.0 mm). The median distance to diagnosing provider was 8 miles (range, 0-386 miles). For each 1-mile increase in distance, Breslow thickness increased by 0.6% (P =.003). For each 1% increase in poverty rate, Breslow thickness increased by 1% (P =.04). Breslow thickness was 19% greater for patients aged 51 to 80 years than for those aged 0 to 50 years (P =.02) and was 109% greater for patients older than 80 years than for those aged 0 to 50 years (P < .001). Sex, rurality, and supply of dermatologists were not associated with Breslow thickness. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with melanoma, distance to the diagnosing provider is a meaningful measure of access that captures different information than community-level measures of rurality, provider supply, and socioeconomic status. Future work should be targeted at identifying factors that may affect distance to diagnosing provider and serve as barriers to melanoma care.


Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Melanoma/diagnosis , Skin Neoplasms/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Databases, Factual , Female , Humans , Incidence , Linear Models , Male , Melanoma/epidemiology , Melanoma/therapy , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , North Carolina/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Skin Neoplasms/epidemiology , Skin Neoplasms/therapy , Socioeconomic Factors
2.
Am Surg ; 72(9): 785-9; discussion 790, 2006 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16986387

ABSTRACT

Minimally invasive parathyroidectomy is an accepted treatment option for primary hyperparathyroidism. The need for intraoperative parathyroid hormone assays (iPTH) to confirm adenoma removal remains controversial. We studied minimally invasive radio-guided parathyroidectomy (MIRP) performed using preoperative sestamibi localization studies, intraoperative gamma detection probe, and the selective use of frozen section pathology without the use of iPTH. This is a single institution review of patients with primary hyperparathyroidism treated with MIRP by surgeons experienced in radio-guided surgery between October 1, 1998 and July 15, 2005. Information was obtained by reviewing computer medical records as well as contacting primary care physicians. Factors evaluated included laboratory values, pathology results, and evidence of recurrence. One hundred forty patients were included with a median preoperative calcium level of 11.3 mg/dL (range, 9.6-17) and a PTH level of 147 pg/mL (range, 19-5042). The median postoperative calcium level was 9.3 mg/dL. All patients were initially eucalcemic postoperatively except for one who had normal parathyroid levels. However, five (4%) patients required re-exploration for various reasons. Of the failures, one was secondary to the development of secondary hyperparathyroidism, and therefore would not have benefited from iPTH, one had thyroid tissue removed at the first operation, and three developed evidence of a second adenoma. One of these three patients had a drop in PTH level from 1558 pg/mL preoperatively to 64 pg/mL on postoperative Day 1, indicating that iPTH would not have prevented this failure. Thus, only three (2.1%) patients could have potentially benefited from the use of iPTH. MIRP was successful in 96 per cent of patients using a combination of preoperative sestamibi scans, intraoperative localization with a gamma probe, and the selective use of frozen pathology. This correlates with reported success rates of 95 per cent to 100 per cent using iPTH. We conclude that minimally invasive parathyroidectomy can be successfully performed without using iPTH assays.


Subject(s)
Adenoma/surgery , Monitoring, Intraoperative , Parathyroid Neoplasms/surgery , Parathyroidectomy/methods , Radiosurgery/methods , Adenoma/diagnostic imaging , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Calcium/blood , Clinical Competence , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures , Parathyroid Hormone/blood , Parathyroid Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Postoperative Care , Preoperative Care , Radionuclide Imaging , Retrospective Studies , Technetium Tc 99m Sestamibi
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...