[Sacral neuromodulation for bladder voiding dysfunction: Experience at a French university center]. / Neuromodulation sacrée pour trouble de la vidange vésicale : expérience d'un centre universitaire français.

OBJECTIVE: To report the experience of a university hospital center with sacral neuromodulation for patients with bladder voiding disorders. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All patients who underwent sacral neuromodulation between 1998 and 2022 for bladder voiding disorders were included. Medical records were analyzed retrospectively, and population, efficacy and follow-up data were collected. RESULTS: A total of 134 patients underwent test implantation and 122 patients were analyzed. 68 patients (56%) were implanted with a definitive neuromodulation device. Mean age was 43±16 years and BMI 25.5±5.4kg/m2. 74% were women. Bladder voiding disorder was due to sphincter hypertonia in 51% of cases, with associated bladder hypocontractility in 29%. The spontaneous micturition rate after implantation increased from 34% to 92%. Implantation results appeared to be better in patients with sphincter hypertonia, whether or not associated with bladder hypocontractility. The benefit was most often present with a frequency of 5Hz (54.4%). Side-effects were present in 52% of cases at 5 years, and in 85% of cases were pain in relation to the implanted devices. They resolved under medical treatment or after revision of the device (27% of cases at 5 years). CONCLUSION: SNM is effective in micturition recovery, but has side effects. Urodynamic mechanism and etiology may provide clues for modulating NMS box settings and determining predictive factors for NMS success. Data from other centers are needed to identify reliable predictive factors.

[Artificial urinary sphincter in patients with urinary incontinence after High Intensity Focused ultrasound]. / Sphincter urinaire artificiel chez les patients présentant une incontinence urinaire après High Intensivity Focused Ultrasound Therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Urinary incontinence after High Intensity Focused ultrasound (HIFU) is a poorly documented issue. To our knowledge, no study has evaluated the outcomes of artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) after HIFU. The aim of this study was to evaluate the functional outcomes of AUS for post-HIFU urinary incontinence. METHODS: The charts of all male patients who underwent an AUS implantation between 2004 and 2020 in 13 centers were reviewed retrospectively. Only men with a history of HIFU were included. The primary endpoint was social continence at 3 months defined as wearing 0 to 1 pad per day. RESULTS: Out of 1318 procedures, nine men were implanted with an AUS after HIFU including four men with an history of pelvic irradiation: 3 pelvic radiation therapy and 1 prostatic brachytherapy. The patients were divided into two groups, 5 in the HIFU group without a history of pelvic irradiation, 4 patients in the HIRX group with a history of pelvic irradiation. The median age was 74 years (IQR 71-76). There was no perioperative complication. The median follow-up was 47.5 (IQR 25-85.5) months. Social continence at 3 months was 75% in the total cohort: 80% in the HIFU group and 67% in the HIRX group. CONCLUSION: AUS implantation may provide satisfactory long-term functional outcomes in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence resulting from HIFU. Larger series are needed to confirm these findings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

[Comparison of penoscrotal and perineal approaches for implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter in man]. / Comparaison des voies d'abords peno-scrotales et perineales pour l'implantation d'un sphincter urinaire artificiel chez l'homme.

INTRODUCTION: Artificial urinary sphincter is considered the gold standard of treatment for male urinary incontinence because of intrinsic sphincter deficiency. The objective of our study was to compare the functional results and complications of the penoscrotal and perineal incision for the implantation of artificial urinary sphincter. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective, monocentric study comparing the perioperative and long-term results of primary implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter in men, performed by the penoscrotal or the perineal incision, was conducted in a French university hospital. RESULTS: Between April 2004 and February 2019, 175 patients were implanted (118 by penoscrotal incision and 57 by perineal incision) by 19 surgeons. Cuff placement approach depended on surgeon preference. The average follow-up was 34.2 ± 35.6 months. Cuff size was smaller in the penoscrotal group (4 [4;5] vs 4.5[4;5] p<0.001). At the end of follow-up, the rates of complete continence, social continence, reintervention for any reason, explantation, and revision was similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Long-term outcomes of penoscrotal and perineal artificial sphincter implantation were similar between the two groups. Prospective multicenter studies are needed to confirm these results.

[Survival analysis of adjustable continence therapy device (ACT®/proACT®): a new message for patients]. / Étude de survie des ballonnets ACT®/proACT® : un nouveau message pour les patients.

INTRODUCTION: The main purpose was to assess the failure free survival of adjustable continence therapy ACT®/proACT® after continence was obtained and to seek factors influencing it. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective, single-center survival study of peri-urethral balloons implanted between 2007 and 2014. Efficacy was defined by the wearing of 0 or 1 safety pad per day. The primary end point was time to failure estimated from a survival curve (Kaplan-Meier). Factors that could influence failure free survival were: sex, age, radiotherapy, diabetes, number of pad before surgery, number of balloon inflation, early complications, mixed urinary incontinence and previous ACT®/proACT® placement. They were analyzed in a COX regression. RESULTS: Of the 82 peri-urethral balloons placed, 41 were effective in 36 patients. The failure free survival was 50 % at 60 months. Radiotherapy, diabetes and previous peri-urethral balloon placement appeared to significantly decrease survival (P=0.031;P=0.025;P=0.029, respectively). Fifteen peri-urethral balloons were still effective at the last follow-up, one was lost to follow-up and 25 required re-intervention for loss of efficacy. The main cause of efficacy loss was system leakage. Fifty-two percent of peri-urethral balloons that became ineffective were replaced by new peri-urethral balloons and 28% by an artificial urinary sphincter. CONCLUSION: Patients who became continent with adjustable continence therapy (ACT®/proACT®) had a 50 % new surgery probability at 5 years for a loss of efficacy. Radiotherapy seems to be the main risk factor of the efficacy loss. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

[Knowledge, practices and expectations in the management of overactive bladder in general practice and gynecology in France]. / Connaissances, pratiques et attentes pour la prise en charge de l'hyperactivité vésicale en France.

INTRODUCTION: Overactive bladder (OAB) is a clinical syndrome characterized by urgency to urinate, with or without urinary incontinence, often associated with nycturia and pollakiuria. The aim of this practice survey is to identify diagnostic modalities and treatment circuits according to the patient's clinical profile and to practitioner's specialty. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 262 physicians practicing in France: 181 general practitioners (GPs) and 81 gynecologists. RESULTS: Urinary disorders were more easily addressed with patients by gynecologists than GPs. Behavioral therapy was the most widely used therapeutic measure, however half of the patients abandoned it. In oldest women and men of all ages, drugs were commonly prescribed, nevertheless only 4 out of 10 patients continued the treatment beyond 6months, according to the physicians. Incontinence was the symptom for which patients were in most need of relief. GPs and gynecologists expressed a need for training, practical tools and recommendations related to OAB. CONCLUSION: Patients and doctors are reluctant to talk about urinary disorders. Non-urologist physicians such as GPs and gynecologists, as health professionals best placed to detect and diagnose OAB, are in demand for training, practical tools and recommendations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.