[Evaluation of outpatient medical pain management in Germany : Results of an internet-based cross-sectional survey among pain specialists in outpatient departments]. / Bewertung der ambulanten ärztlichen Schmerztherapie in Deutschland : Ergebnisse einer internetbasierten Querschnittsbefragung unter ambulant tätigen Schmerzmedizinern.

BACKGROUND: On 31 December 2016, a total of 1206 physicians participated in the outpatient care of chronic pain patients according to the criteria of a special pain management program (QSV). Because of the largely existing shortage of treatment resources for chronic pain patients, there is a lack of data regarding the evaluation of outpatient pain management by highly specialized pain therapists. METHODS: In a hybrid Delphi procedure, a questionnaire concerning the content, structural and personal assessment of outpatient pain management in Germany was developed. With the help of this instrument, an internet-based cross-sectional survey of 281 QSV pain therapists from four German states (Berlin, Lower Saxony, Saxony, Baden-Württemberg) and of all the heads of university outpatient pain services (n = 36) in Germany was conducted. RESULTS: The adjusted response rate of the survey was 35.9%. The response rate of the heads of university outpatient pain services was 66.7%. In 91% of the respondents the proportion of chronic pain patients in the medical practices was more than 70%. Whereas 67.3% were satisfied with the situation in their medical practice, 63.4% were dissatisfied with the current organizational structure of the pain management in Germany. They expressed their dissatisfaction especially in terms of budgeting regulations (69.3%), the cooperation with psychotherapists (69.3%) and interdisciplinary networking (50.5%). The 1­year specialist training in pain management (87.1%) and the completion of a psychosomatic basic care course (90.1%) were assessed as a good preparation for the later profession. A multitude of free comments indicated that the pain specialist training is too short and insufficient. Most of the respondents considered the establishment of a specialist board certification for pain management more suitable from the perspective of physicians (61.4%) and the patients (54.5%). Of the heads of university outpatient pain services 70.8% expressed the wish for autonomous structures with separate budgets and 75.0% indicated that under the current conditions their outpatient pain services are not working profitably. Only 39.7% of the QSV pain therapists provided fellowship training for physicians and 57.6% were planning to retire during the next 10 years. CONCLUSION: Highly specialized pain therapists are dissatisfied because of the lack of independence of the organizational structure of pain management care and the insufficient interdisciplinary network in outpatient pain management. A possible solution for a better pain management care and the recruitment problems may be the establishment of a board certification for pain management.

The best from East and West? Acupuncture and medical training therapy as monotherapies or in combination for adult patients with episodic and chronic tension-type headache: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of a complex health intervention, based on the combination of conventional Western medicine and traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), in an outpatient department of a university hospital for patients with frequent episodic or chronic tension-type headaches. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a prospective randomized controlled pilot study with four balanced treatment arms (usual care, acupuncture, training, and training plus acupuncture). Each arm will have 24 patients. After the initial screening examination and randomization, a 6-week treatment period follows, with treatment frequencies decreasing at 2-week intervals. After completion of the intervention, two follow-up evaluations will be performed 3 and 6 months after the start of treatment. At predefined times, the various outcomes (pain intensity, health-related quality of life, pain duration, autonomic regulation, and heart rate variability) as well as the participants' acceptance of the complex treatment will be evaluated with valid assessment instruments (Migraine Disability Assessment, PHQ-D, GAD-7, and SF-12) and a headache diary. The acupuncture treatment will be based on the rules of TCM, comprising a standardized combination of acupuncture points and additional points selected according to individual pain localization. The training therapy comprises a combination of strength training, endurance training, and training to improve flexibility and coordination. Besides descriptive analyses of the samples, their comparability will be assessed using an analysis of variance (ANOVA) or chi-squared tests. Analyses will be performed on an intention-to-treat basis. Potential interaction effects will be calculated using a repeated-measures ANOVA to test the primary and secondary hypotheses. In supplementary analyses, the proportion of treatment responders (those with a 50% reduction in the frequency of pain episodes) will be determined for each treatment arm. DISCUSSION: This trial may provide evidence for the additive effects of acupuncture and medical training therapy as a combination treatment and may scientifically support the implementation of this complex health intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered on 11 Feburary 2019. German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00016723.

[Development and Implementation of a Comprehensive Health Management System (Fit for Work and Life) for Employees of a University Hospital - A Practice Report]. / Entwicklung und Implementierung eines umfassenden Gesundheitsmanagements (Fit for Work and Life) für Mitarbeiter/innen eines Universitätsklinikums ­ ein Praxisbericht.

Background: Due to the increase of sick leave, prolonging working life and the prediction of shortage of skilled workers in the future, health management systems are continuously gaining importance. Employees in a University Hospital are exposed to particular stress factors, which are also reflected in a higher than average amount of sick leave. Against this background, the project "Fit for Work and Life" (FWL) was developed and implemented by the Hannover Medical School (MHH). Aims: FWL aims to maintain, improve or recover the work ability of employees by offering both preventive and rehabilitative treatments. A second goal is to significantly reduce the days of sick leave. Methods: The project was jointly developed and implemented by five MHH departments and the DRV Braunschweig-Hannover (DRV BS-H) according to previously defined principles. It was scientifically evaluated by the following outcomes: average days of sick leave, work ability (WAI), quality of life (SF-36, WHOQOL), coping strategies (FERUS) and effort-reward imbalance (ERI). Results and Conclusions: So far, this project is unique in its concept. It has been successfully implemented in the organisational structures of the MHH. 376 employees have registered during the first project year. Up to now, 182 participants have completed their individual programmes. The results show that 60.4% of employees have moderate to poor WAI values. The average of the mental summary scale of the SF-36 was 44.9, indicating a high workload.

[The impact of catastrophizing on the effect of depression on pain and functional ability : A longitudinal mediator analysis]. / Der Einfluss von Katastrophisieren auf den Effekt von Depressivität auf Schmerz und körperliche Funktion : Eine längsschnittliche Mediatoranalyse.

BACKGROUND: While the association between pain and depression is well proven, little is known about the mechanisms influencing this relationship. The cognitive distortion of catastrophizing plays a significant role in several concepts of both diseases. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to analyze the role of catastrophizing on the effect of depression on pain and functional ability. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Participants were recruited from 11 outpatient rehabilitation centers in Germany at the beginning of orthopedic rehabilitation aftercare. Perceived functional ability (spinal function sort), pain intensity (rating scales) and physical functioning (36-item Short-Form Health Survey, SF-36) were assessed as dependent variables at the beginning of the aftercare (T1) as well as 6 months later (T2). The independent variable depression (Patient Health Questionnaire and Mental Health Index of the SF-36) as well as the mediator catastrophizing (Coping Strategies Questionnaire) were measured at T1. Pathway models were used to analyze the direct and indirect proportions of the total effect of an independent variable on a dependent variable and the role of catastrophizing as a mediator of this association. RESULTS: A total of 241 patients were included in the analyses. Depression had a significant total effect on pain as well as functional capacity. Catastrophizing mediated substantial proportions of these effects (42.9-87.1%). CONCLUSION: Catastrophizing mediates the relationship between depression and pain as well as functional capacity; therefore, the reduction of catastrophizing thoughts and attitudes should be a focus in rehabilitation programs.

[Intensified Work-Related Rehabilitation Aftercare: Long-term Results of a Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial]. / Intensivierte medizinisch-beruflich orientierte Rehabilitationsnachsorge: Langfristige Ergebnisse der randomisiert-kontrollierten Multicenter-Studie.

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of an intensified work-related rehabilitation aftercare (IWORAC) in comparison to the conventional intensified rehabilitation aftercare (IRAC). METHODS: Patients with severe limitations of work-related functioning were recruited in 11 outpatient rehabilitation centres at the beginning of their orthopaedic rehabilitation aftercare and randomly assigned to the interventions. The control group (n=150) received the IRAC while the intervention group (n=157) received the IWORAC which amended the IRAC by work-related functional capacity training, work-related psychosocial groups, social counselling and relaxation training. The primary outcome was work ability. Treatment effects were analyzed by generalized linear regression models. RESULTS: There was no statistically relevant between-group difference in follow-up primary or secondary (e. g., duration of sick leave, quality of life) outcomes. Both groups improved their quality of life and work ability considerably. CONCLUSION: RESULTS were not in favour of the IWORAC. The improvement of existing aftercare treatments might require a stronger involvement of the employer.