ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Access to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) remains limited among persons of non-European ancestry if human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching is required. We evaluated whether post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy)-based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis improved HCT outcomes with HLA-matched unrelated donor (MUD) and mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD) HCT when compared with calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based prophylaxis. METHODS: Three-year overall survival (OS) and GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) were compared between adult recipients undergoing initial MUD or single HLA locus MMUD HCT with either PTCy- or CNI-based prophylaxis who were reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research between 2017 and 2021. RESULTS: Included were 10,025 HCT recipients (7,272 recipients of MUD with CNI, 1,681 MUD with PTCy, 613 MMUD with CNI, and 459 MMUD with PTCy) who underwent HCT for acute leukemia (70.9%) or myelodysplastic syndromes (29.2%). Median patient age was 60.7 years (range, 18.0-82.7) and median follow-up was 36.6 (range, 3.0-77.8) months. When compared with MUD HCT with PTCy, MMUD HCT with PTCy had similar OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.96 [95% CI, 0.823 to 1.11]; P = .60) and GRFS (HR, 0.90 [0.79 to 1.02]; P = .1). When compared with MUD HCT with CNI, OS was improved after MUD HCT with PTCy (HR, 0.88 [0.80 to 0.96]; P = .004) and GRFS was improved with PTCy after either MUD (HR, 0.61 [0.57 to 0.66]; P < .0001) or MMUD (HR, 0.68 [0.60 to 0.76]; P < .0001) HCT. Benefit from PTCy was independent of patient ancestry. Global registry level analysis demonstrated that inclusion of MMUD increased donor availability regardless of recipient ancestry. CONCLUSION: Use of PTCy results in comparable OS and GRFS using either MUD or MMUD HCT, expanding access to HCT for patients from all racial and ethnic ancestry groups.
ABSTRACT
The role of maintenance therapy in multiple myeloma is controversial. Recent studies have shown an improvement in both progression-free and overall survival for patients receiving maintenance treatment with a combination of interferon and glucocorticoids, compared with interferon alone. The role of glucocorticoids alone as maintenance therapy has not been previously addressed. We compared alternate-day, oral prednisone at 2 different dose levels (10 mg versus 50 mg) for remission maintenance among previously untreated myeloma patients following a response to induction with standard-dose vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone with prednisone (VAD-P) or VAD-P plus quinine (VAD-P/Q). There were 250 eligible patients registered on Southwest Oncology Group study 9210 and randomized to receive VAD-P or VAD-P/Q. There were 125 patients achieving at least a 25% tumor reduction following induction therapy who were randomized to either physiologic (10 mg) or pharmacologic (50 mg) doses of alternate-day, oral prednisone until disease progression. At the time of study entry, patient characteristics were similar in VAD-P and VAD-P/Q patients and in the 2 arms randomized to maintenance therapy. After a median follow-up of 53 months, there was no difference in either progression-free or overall survival between the 2 induction regimens. However, from the time of maintenance randomization, both progression-free (14 versus 5 months; P =.003) and overall survival (37 versus 26 months; P =.05) were significantly improved in patients receiving 50 mg as compared with 10 mg alternate-day prednisone. There was no difference in treatment-related adverse events between the groups. Thus, 50 mg, oral, alternate-day prednisone is effective maintenance treatment for multiple myeloma patients who achieve a response to induction chemotherapy. (Blood. 2002;99:3163-3168)
