A Qualitative Study Examining Experiences and Dilemmas in Concealment and Disclosure of People Living With Serious Mental Illness.

People with mental illnesses face the dilemma of whether to disclose or conceal their diagnosis, but this dilemma was scarcely researched. To gain in-depth understanding of this dilemma, we interviewed 29 individuals with mental illnesses: 16 with major depression/bipolar disorders and 13 with schizophrenia. Using a phenomenological design, we analyzed individuals' experiences, decision-making processes, and views of gains and costs regarding concealment and disclosure of mental illness. We found that participants employed both positive and negative disclosure/concealment practices. Positive practices included enhancing personal recovery, community integration, and/or supporting others. Negative practices occurred in forced, uncontrolled situations. We also identified various influencing factors, including familial norms of sharing, accumulated experiences with disclosure, and ascribed meaning to diagnosis. Based on these findings, we deepen the understanding about decision-making processes and the consequences of disclosing or concealing mental illness. We discuss how these finding can help consumers explore potential benefits and disadvantages of mental illness disclosure/concealment occurrences.

Recovery in Israel: a legislative recovery response to the needs-rights paradox.

This paper uses the framework of the applied social science needs/rights antinomy to describe the efforts of Israel's mental health system in transforming a hospital-based orientation to services for individuals with a severe mental illness, to a community-based recovery orientation. On the one hand, a rationale for the provision of services to individuals with a severe mental illness that stresses these individuals' needs can justify the allocation of society's limited resources by referring to an objectively determinable set of psychiatric needs. However, this rationale may establish an inherent asymmetry between the adequate help provider and deficient help user. On the other hand, a rationale for providing psychiatric rehabilitation services that stresses the fundamental symmetry between the help provider and the help user is empowering, thus consistent with the recovery approach. However, this rationale does not provide a mechanism for negotiating the vague boundary between mental health and mental illness. Israel's mental health system has operationalized a policy that emphasizes rights as well as needs by legislating for a comprehensive set of rehabilitation services that individuals meeting the eligibility criteria may receive. This paper discusses this approach's achievements, challenges and implications for future policy, research, and practice.