Validity and reliability of a portable handheld dynamometer compared to a fixed isokinetic dynamometer to assess forearm torque strength.

To evaluate the effect of treatment on forearm rotation, torque muscle strength can be assessed using an isokinetic device (IKD) or a wrist dynamometer (WD). The aims of this study were 1) to determine concurrent validity and intra- and inter-rater reliability using the WD, and to examine correlations between WD and IKD in different positions; and 2) subsequently, to establish the intermethod reproducibility between WD as a handheld (HHD) or fixed device. We conducted a cross-sectional study in which torque strength was measured in healthy participants by two observers using an IKD and a WD. Study endpoints were concurrent validity (Pearson's r), intra- and inter-rater reliability, intermethod reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficient: ICC) and measurement error (limits of agreement: LoA). Concurrent validity ranged, in the 2 studies assessing it, from r 0.37 to 0.52 for pronation and from r 0.50 to 0.82 for supination, with wide 95% confidence intervals. ICC for intra-rater reliability for pronation ranged from 0.85 to 0.91 and for supination from 0.91 to 0.95. ICC for inter-rater reliability for pronation ranged from 0.84 to 0.96 and for supination from 0.92 to 0.96. Despite the excellent intra- and inter-rater reliability and intermethod reproducibility for the WD-HHD and fixed WD, validity was low when compared to IKD and wide LoA indicated a high measurement error of approximately 20%. These results suggest that the WD cannot replace the IKD isometric mode for pronation and supination. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

Trapeziometacarpal arthrodesis or trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction in primary trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Both trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition and trapeziometacarpal arthrodesis are commonly performed procedures for the treatment of trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of both treatments for symptomatic osteoarthritis of the thumb trapeziometacarpal joint in a randomized trial. METHODS: Women who were forty years of age or older were randomized either to trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition or to arthrodesis with plate and screws. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and at three and twelve months postoperatively with respect to pain, function (Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation [PRWHE] and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand [DASH] questionnaires), joint motion, strength, complication rate, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Forty-three patients were enrolled. Since we found significantly more moderate and severe complications following arthrodesis compared with trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (71% versus 29%; p = 0.016), the study was prematurely terminated before the sample size necessary to validly compare the two groups was reached. The higher complication rate for arthrodesis led to an increase in revision surgery (two of seventeen patients). Significantly more patients in the ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition group (86%) than in the arthrodesis group (53%) indicated they would consider the same surgery again under the same circumstances (p = 0.025). In both groups, PRWHE and DASH scores significantly improved over time; however, comparison of the groups showed that the results were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Women who are forty years or older with trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis have fewer moderate and severe complications after trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition and are more likely to consider the surgery again under the same circumstances than are those who undergo arthrodesis. Twelve months after surgery, the PRWHE and DASH scores were similar in both groups. We do not recommend routine use of arthrodesis with plate and screws in the treatment of women who are forty years or older with stage-II or III trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis.

Ligament reconstruction arthroplasty for primary thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis (weilby technique): prospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: The Weilby procedure is one of several accepted methods to treat primary thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis. We found no previous studies that included preoperative and postoperative subjective outcomes using validated questionnaires or preoperative and postoperative objective outcomes such as specific strength and range-of-motion measurements. Therefore, we performed a prospective cohort study in which we analyzed preoperative and postoperative objective and subjective outcomes after Weilby interposition tendoplasty. METHODS: Nineteen patients (20 thumbs) with primary thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis were treated with Weilby interposition tendoplasty. For subjective assessment, the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) outcome data collection instrument was used to evaluate preoperative and postoperative outcomes at 0, 3, 6, and 12 months. Furthermore, patients completed a specific personal questionnaire at 12 months of follow-up. Objective assessments included interphalangeal joint flexion/extension; metacarpophalangeal joint flexion/extension; and carpometacarpal joint palmar abduction, opposition, and extension. Tip pinch, key pinch, 3-point pinch, and overall grip strengths were also measured. The measurements were performed preoperatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. All complications were registered. RESULTS: The DASH score was significantly improved, and 17 of 19 patients were satisfied with the procedure. The interphalangeal joint flexion/extension, metacarpophalangeal joint flexion/extension, and carpometacarpal joint extension did not significantly change. Carpometacarpal joint palmar abduction and opposition were significantly improved at 12 months. The tip pinch and key pinch strengths were increased but not significantly. The 3-point pinch and overall grip strengths were significantly improved at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: The Weilby procedure is a reliable alternative to treat primary thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis without requiring bone tunnel creation. It achieves pain relief, stability, mobility, and strength. The objective and subjective outcomes of this study compare favorably with those of earlier reports of the Weilby procedure and are similar to the published results of the more commonly performed Burton-Pellegrini technique. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.