SCOT: Rethinking the classification of secondary structure elements.

MOTIVATION: Secondary structure classification is one of the most important issues in structure-based analyses due to its impact on secondary structure prediction, structural alignment and protein visualization. There are still open challenges concerning helix and sheet assignments which are currently not addressed by a single multi-purpose software. RESULTS: We introduce SCOT (Secondary structure Classification On Turns) as a novel secondary structure element assignment software which supports the assignment of turns, right-handed α-, 310- and π-helices, left-handed α- and 310-helices, 2.27- and polyproline II helices, ß-sheets and kinks. We demonstrate that the introduction of helix Purity values enables a clear differentiation between helix classes. SCOT's unique strengths are highlighted by comparing it to six state-of-the-art methods (DSSP, STRIDE, ASSP, SEGNO, DISICL and SHAFT). The assignment approaches were compared concerning geometric consistency, protein structure quality and flexibility dependency and their impact on secondary structure element-based structural alignments. We show that only SCOT's combination of hydrogen bonds, geometric criteria and dihedral angles enables robust assignments independent of the structure quality and flexibility. We demonstrate that this combination and the elaborate kink detection lead to SCOT's clear superiority for protein alignments. As the resulting helices and strands are provided in a PDB conform output format, they can immediately be used for structure alignment algorithms. Taken together, the application of our new method and the straight-forward visualization using the accompanying PyMOL scripts enable the comprehensive analysis of regular backbone geometries in proteins. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://this-group.rocks. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Binding site characterization - similarity, promiscuity, and druggability.

The elucidation of non-obvious binding site similarities has provided useful indications for the establishment of polypharmacology, the identification of potential off-targets, or the repurposing of known drugs. The concept underlying all of these approaches is promiscuous binding which can be analyzed from a ligand-based or a binding site-based perspective. Herein, we applied methods for the automated analysis and comparison of protein binding sites to study promiscuous binding on a novel dataset of sites in complex with ligands sharing common shape and physicochemical properties. We show the suitability of this dataset for the benchmarking of novel binding site comparison methods. Our investigations also reveal promising directions for further in-depth analyses of promiscuity and druggability in a pocket-centered manner. Drawbacks concerning binding site similarity assessment and druggability prediction are outlined, enabling researchers to avoid the typical pitfalls of binding site analyses.

A benchmark driven guide to binding site comparison: An exhaustive evaluation using tailor-made data sets (ProSPECCTs).

The automated comparison of protein-ligand binding sites provides useful insights into yet unexplored site similarities. Various stages of computational and chemical biology research can benefit from this knowledge. The search for putative off-targets and the establishment of polypharmacological effects by comparing binding sites led to promising results for numerous projects. Although many cavity comparison methods are available, a comprehensive analysis to guide the choice of a tool for a specific application is wanting. Moreover, the broad variety of binding site modeling approaches, comparison algorithms, and scoring metrics impedes this choice. Herein, we aim to elucidate strengths and weaknesses of binding site comparison methodologies. A detailed benchmark study is the only possibility to rationalize the selection of appropriate tools for different scenarios. Specific evaluation data sets were developed to shed light on multiple aspects of binding site comparison. An assembly of all applied benchmark sets (ProSPECCTs-Protein Site Pairs for the Evaluation of Cavity Comparison Tools) is made available for the evaluation and optimization of further and still emerging methods. The results indicate the importance of such analyses to facilitate the choice of a methodology that complies with the requirements of a specific scientific challenge.

A novel interaction fingerprint derived from per atom score contributions: exhaustive evaluation of interaction fingerprint performance in docking based virtual screening.

Protein ligand interaction fingerprints are a powerful approach for the analysis and assessment of docking poses to improve docking performance in virtual screening. In this study, a novel interaction fingerprint approach (PADIF, protein per atom score contributions derived interaction fingerprint) is presented which was specifically designed for utilising the GOLD scoring functions' atom contributions together with a specific scoring scheme. This allows the incorporation of known protein-ligand complex structures for a target-specific scoring. Unlike many other methods, this approach uses weighting factors reflecting the relative frequency of a specific interaction in the references and penalizes destabilizing interactions. In addition, and for the first time, an exhaustive validation study was performed that assesses the performance of PADIF and two other interaction fingerprints in virtual screening. Here, PADIF shows superior results, and some rules of thumb for a successful use of interaction fingerprints could be identified.

PyGOLD: a python based API for docking based virtual screening workflow generation.

MOTIVATION: Molecular docking is one of the successful approaches in structure based discovery and development of bioactive molecules in chemical biology and medicinal chemistry. Due to the huge amount of computational time that is still required, docking is often the last step in a virtual screening approach. Such screenings are set as workflows spanned over many steps, each aiming at different filtering task. These workflows can be automatized in large parts using python based toolkits except for docking using the docking software GOLD. However, within an automated virtual screening workflow it is not feasible to use the GUI in between every step to change the GOLD configuration file. Thus, a python module called PyGOLD was developed, to parse, edit and write the GOLD configuration file and to automate docking based virtual screening workflows. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The latest version of PyGOLD, its documentation and example scripts are available at: http://www.ccb.tu-dortmund.de/koch or http://www.agkoch.de. PyGOLD is implemented in Python and can be imported as a standard python module without any further dependencies. CONTACT: oliver.koch@agkoch.de, oliver.koch@tu-dortmund.de. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Impact of Binding Site Comparisons on Medicinal Chemistry and Rational Molecular Design.

Modern rational drug design not only deals with the search for ligands binding to interesting and promising validated targets but also aims to identify the function and ligands of yet uncharacterized proteins having impact on different diseases. Additionally, it contributes to the design of inhibitors with distinct selectivity patterns and the prediction of possible off-target effects. The identification of similarities between binding sites of various proteins is a useful approach to cope with those challenges. The main scope of this perspective is to describe applications of different protein binding site comparison approaches to outline their applicability and impact on molecular design. The article deals with various substantial application domains and provides some outstanding examples to show how various binding site comparison methods can be applied to promote in silico drug design workflows. In addition, we will also briefly introduce the fundamental principles of different protein binding site comparison methods.