A method for determining the free (unbound) concentration of ten beta-lactam antibiotics in human plasma using high performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection.

With the clinical imperative to further research in the area of optimising antibiotic dosing in the intensive care setting, a simple high performance liquid chromatography method was developed and validated for routinely determining the free (unbound) concentration of ten beta-lactam antibiotics in 200 µL of human plasma. Antibiotics determined include three cephalosporins (ceftriaxone, cephazolin and cephalotin); two carbapenems (meropenem and ertapenem); and five penicillins (ampicillin, piperacillin, benzylpenicillin, flucloxacillin and dicloxacillin). There was a single common sample preparation method involving ultracentrifugation and stabilisation. Chromatography was performed on a Waters XBridge C18 column with, depending on analytes, one of four acetonitrile-phosphate buffered mobile phases. Peaks of interest were detected via ultraviolet absorbance at 210, 260 and 304 nm. The method has been validated and used in a pathology laboratory for therapeutic drug monitoring in critically ill patients. The significant variability in the level of protein binding that is common with antibiotics traditionally considered to have high protein binding (e.g. ceftriaxone, cephazolin, ertapenem, flucloxacillin and dicloxacillin) suggests that this assay should be preferred for measuring the pharmacologically active concentration of beta-lactam antibiotics in a therapeutic drug monitoring programme.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of beta-lactam antibiotics in burns patients--a one-year prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Beta-lactams are first-line antibiotics for the management of superficial infections due to burn injury. There is sparse data available on therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in patients with burns in a ward setting. This study was conducted to evaluate the utility of a beta-lactam TDM program in a cohort of burn injury patients in a ward environment. METHODS: Steady-state blood samples were collected immediately before a scheduled dose. The therapeutic concentration targets assessed were (1) free antibiotic concentrations exceeding the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC; fT > MIC) and (2) free concentrations ≥4× MIC of the known or suspected pathogen (fT > 4× MIC). The duration of therapy was also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients were included for TDM over a 12-month period. The mean (±SD) age was 49 ± 16 years. The mean percent total body surface area burn was 17 ± 13%. The mean serum creatinine concentration was 86 ± 20 µmole/L. Sixty percent of the patients did not achieve fT > MIC, and only 18% achieved the higher target of fT > 4× MIC. Although all the patients achieved a positive clinical outcome, the duration of antibiotic treatment was shorter in patients who achieved fT > MIC compared with those who did not (4.2 ± 1.1 versus 5.3 ± 2.3 days; P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: We found TDM to be a reliable intervention for burn injury patients in a ward environment. This study supports pharmacokinetic data that burns patients may be at risk of subtherapeutic dosing, which may prolong the duration of antibiotic therapy.

Free cortisol method comparison: ultrafiltation, equilibrium dialysis, tracer dilution, tandem mass spectrometry and calculated free cortisol.

BACKGROUND: Free cortisol (FC) can be calculated from measurements of total cortisol and binding proteins or measured after mechanical separation of unbound and bound fractions by equilibrium dialysis or ultrafiltration. FC can then be measured indirectly by 3H-cortisol dilution or directly by immunologic or tandem mass spectrometry assays. METHODS: We compared FC measured with ultra high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC MS/MS) with 3H-cortisol dilution in ultrafiltrates and dialysates and also with calculated FC (Coolens equation). An adult FC reference interval was established. RESULTS: The UHPLC MS/MS and 3H-cortisol dilution methods were non-linearly related (Cusum linearity test p<0.001) but well correlated (R2=0.984). FC calculated with Coolens equation agreed with the UHPLC MS/MS method. Impurity of 3H-cortisol and non-specific adsorption were excluded as causes on non-linearity. Ultrafiltration was linearly related to equilibrium dialysis, simpler to perform and more repeatable. A gender non-specific FC reference interval of 2.1-19.1 nmol/L was established. CONCLUSIONS: In view of the non-linearity between measuring techniques and the variability of reported reference ranges, care should be exercised in adopting a reference range. The ultrafiltration UHPLC MS/MS method we described is robust and suitable for use in a routine laboratory.

Measurement of cortisol, cortisone, prednisolone, dexamethasone and 11-deoxycortisol with ultra high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry: Application for plasma, plasma ultrafiltrate, urine and saliva in a routine laboratory.

We describe an ultra high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC MS/MS) method suitable for a routine laboratory to determine endogenous and exogenous glucocorticoids in plasma, plasma ultrafiltrate, urine and saliva in a single analytical run. After addition of a multi-analyte internal standard, a standardised sample preparation procedure with solid phase extraction followed, before injecting into a tandem mass spectrometer with positive mode electron spray ionisation and multiple reactant monitoring acquisition. The chromatography time was 3min. The limit of quantitation for cortisol and cortisone in plasma was 3.75nmol/L and linearity extended to 2000nmol/L. The limit of quantitation for cortisol in plasma ultrafiltrate and saliva was 0.6nmol/L. The limit of quantitation for 11-deoxycortisol and prednisolone was 5nmol/L and for dexamethasone 1nmol/L. The intra-assay CV was <5% and the inter-assay CV <10% for all analytes in all matrices. Comparison with an immuno-assay (IA) plasma cortisol method resulted in a regression equation of UHPLC=0.79×IA+31.12 with R(2)=0.960 (p<0.0001). Comparison with a high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) cortisol method yielded a regression equation of UHPLC=1.06×HPLC+9.82, R(2)=0.992 (p<0.0001). The simultaneous measurement of endogenous and exogenous glucocorticoids contributed to patient care in cases with dexamethasone and metyrapone dynamic tests and unsuspected therapeutic glucocorticoid use.