COVID-19 has heightened tensions between and exposed threats to core values of emergency medicine.

BACKGROUND: Professional culture is a powerful influence in emergency departments, but incompletely understood. Disasters magnify cultural realities, and as such the COVID-19 pandemic offered a unique opportunity to better understand emergency medicine (EM) values, practices, and beliefs. METHODS: We conducted a collaborative ethnography at a tertiary care center during the acute phase of the response to the threat of COVID-19 (March-May 2020). Collaborative ethnography is a method that partners directly with communities during design, data gathering, and analysis to study culture. An ED-based research team gathered data including field notes from 300 h of participant observation and informal interviews, 42 semi-structured interviews, and 57 departmental documents. Data were deductively coded using a previously generated framework for understanding EM culture. RESULTS: Each of seven core values from the original framework were identified in the dataset and further contextualized understanding of EM culture. COVID-19 exacerbated pre-existing tensions and threats to the core values of EM. For example, the desire to provide patient-centered care was impeded by strict visitor restrictions; the ability to treat life-threatening illness was impaired by new resuscitation room layouts and infection control procedures; and subtle changes in protocols had downstream impact on flow and the ability to balance needs and resources at a system level. The cultural values related to teams were protective and strengthened during this time. The pandemic exposed problems with the status quo, underscored inherent tensions between ED values, and highlighted threats to self-identity. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 has highlighted and compounded existing tensions and threats to the core values of EM, underscoring a critical mismatch between values and practice. Realignment of the realities of ED work with staff values is urgently needed.

RéSUMé: CONTEXTE: La culture professionnelle est une influence puissante dans les services d'urgence, mais elle est incomplètement comprise. Les catastrophes amplifient les réalités culturelles et, à ce titre, la pandémie de COVID-19 a offert une occasion unique de mieux comprendre les valeurs, les pratiques et les croyances de la médecine d'urgence (MU). MéTHODES: Nous avons mené une ethnographie collaborative dans un centre de soins tertiaires pendant la phase aiguë de la réponse à la menace du COVID-19 (mars-mai 2020). L'ethnographie collaborative est une méthode qui s'associe directement aux communautés pendant la conception, la collecte de données et l'analyse pour étudier la culture. Une équipe de recherche basée à l'urgence a recueilli des données, y compris des notes de terrain tirées de 300 heures d'observation des participants et d'entrevues informelles, de 42 entrevues semi-structurées et de 57 documents ministériels. Les données ont été codées de manière déductive à l'aide d'un cadre précédemment créé pour comprendre la culture de la MU. RéSULTATS: Chacune des sept valeurs fondamentales du cadre original a été identifiée dans l'ensemble de données et a permis de mieux comprendre la culture de la MU. COVID-19 a exacerbé les tensions préexistantes et les menaces qui pèsent sur les valeurs fondamentales de la MU. Par exemple, le désir de fournir des soins centrés sur le patient a été entravé par des restrictions strictes concernant les visiteurs ; la capacité de traiter des maladies potentiellement mortelles a été compromise par les nouvelles dispositions des salles de réanimation et des procédures de contrôle des infections ; et des changements subtils dans les protocoles ont eu un impact en aval sur le flux et la capacité à équilibrer les besoins et les ressources au niveau du système. Les valeurs culturelles liées aux équipes étaient protectrices et renforcées pendant cette période. La pandémie a mis en évidence les problèmes liés au statu quo, souligné les tensions inhérentes entre les valeurs des services d'urgence et mis en évidence les menaces pour l'identité personnelle. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 a mis en évidence et aggravé les tensions et les menaces existantes pour les valeurs fondamentales de la MU, soulignant un décalage critique entre les valeurs et la pratique. Il est urgent de réaligner les réalités du travail dans les services d'urgence sur les valeurs du personnel.

Experiences of Physiotherapy Students, Health Care Providers, and Patients with a Role-Emerging Student Clinical Placement in an Emergency Department: A Qualitative Study.

Purpose: To understand the experiences and perspectives of physiotherapy (PT) students, their clinical instructor, nurses, physicians, and patients with a role-emerging student clinical placement in an emergency department (ED) and to identify barriers and facilitators in implementing this placement model. Method: We conducted qualitative semi-structured interviews with 6 PT students, 1 PT clinical instructor, 15 nurses, 12 physicians, and 17 patients. Five researchers independently coded the transcribed interviews and performed thematic analysis in an interpretive description tradition with frequent peer debriefing and reflexive discussions. Results: Students and their clinical instructor reported that the placement setting provided a unique learning opportunity. Patients and ED staff noted that involving the PT students in patient care delivery improved the musculoskeletal assessments and self-management advice provided to patients. Identified barriers included students' inability to chart in the electronic medical record, lack of bed space, and lack of clarity about students' scope and abilities. Reported facilitators included positive perceptions of the students' supervision and a perceived positive impact on patient care and the health care team. Conclusions: Participants reported positive experiences with the student ED placement and recommended similar placements in the future. Understanding barriers and facilitators in implementing PT student clinical placements in an ED can inform future placements.

Objectif : comprendre les expériences et les perspectives des étudiants en physiothérapie, de leur moniteur clinique, des infirmières, des médecins et des patients à l'égard d'un stage clinique émergent en physiothérapie à l'urgence et déterminer les obstacles et les incitatifs à l'adoption de ce modèle de stage. Méthodologie : entrevues qualitatives semi-structurées auprès de six étudiants en physiothérapie, un moniteur clinique en physiothérapie, 15 infirmières, 12 médecins et 17 patients. Cinq chercheurs ont codé la transcription des entrevues de manière indépendante et ont procédé à une analyse thématique dans la tradition de la description interprétative accompagnée de fréquents bilans avec les collègues et de fréquentes discussions réflexives. Résultats : selon les étudiants et leur moniteur clinique, le milieu de stage fournissait une occasion d'apprentissage unique. Les patients et le personnel de l'urgence ont remarqué que les étudiants amélioraient les évaluations musculosquelettiques et les conseils d'autoévaluation fournis aux patients. Les obstacles perçus étaient l'incapacité des étudiants à consigner l'information dans les dossiers médicaux électroniques, le manque de lits et le manque de clarté quant à la portée de pratiques et aux capacités des étudiants. Les incitatifs constatés incluaient les perceptions positives à l'égard de la supervision des étudiants et la perception de conséquences positives sur les soins pour les patients et l'équipe soignante. Conclusions : les participants ont fait état d'expériences positives dans le cadre des stages des étudiants à l'urgence et ont recommandé des stages semblables à l'avenir. Le fait de comprendre les obstacles et les incitatifs à la mise en œuvre de stages cliniques pour les physiothérapeutes à l'urgence pourra éclairer les futurs stages.

Descriptive analysis of work and non-work related motor vehicle collisions in Kingston, Ontario.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the proportion of MVC injuries occurring while working, and to compare the age, sex, injury, and season the collision occurred between those involved in work and non-work related MVCs. METHODS: The Kingston and Region Injury Surveillance Program (KRISP), a subset of the Canadian Hospitals Injury Reporting and Prevention Program, was used to identify MVCs occurring between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2007. Variables analyzed included the characteristics of the injured patient, the type of injury, and factors associated with the collision. Descriptive statistics were computed and a non-parametric test for trend was calculated. RESULTS: Work-related MVC injuries accounted for 4.6% of all MVC injuries reported in the KRISP database. Work-related MVCs occurred with greater frequency in winter months and injured more males than females compared to non-work related MVCs. Pattern of injury differed among males and patient disposition differed among both males and females. CONCLUSIONS: There are important differences in terms of patient demographics and factors associated with the collision between those injured in work and non-work related MVCs.

Low-impact pelvic fractures in the emergency department.

OBJECTIVE: We examined the records of patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with low-impact pelvic fractures. We describe frequency, demographics, management and patient outcomes in terms of ambulatory ability, living independence and mortality. METHODS: Patients treated for a pelvic fracture over a 2-year period in Kingston, Ont., were identified. We performed a retrospective hospital record review to distinguish high- versus low-impact injury mechanisms, and to characterize the injury event, ED management and outcomes for patients with low-impact fractures. RESULTS: Of 132 pelvic fractures identified, 77 were low-impact fractures. Patients were predominantly women (82%) with a mean age of 81 years; 96% had some pre-existing medical comorbidity. The pubic rami were most commonly involved (86%). The median length of stay in the ED was 9.4 hours. Twenty-five patients (32%) were admitted to hospital. Ten patients had surgical stabilization, mostly of the acetabulum. Five patients died in hospital, 4 from pneumonia and 1 from myocardial infarction. Eight additional patients died within 1 year of injury. At discharge, only 18% lived independently and 16% walked without aids versus 42% and 38%, respectively, before injury. CONCLUSION: Low-impact pelvic fractures affect predominantly elderly women with pre-existing comorbidities. A substantial amount of time and resources in the ED are used during the workup of these patients and while awaiting their disposition from the ED. These injuries are important because they affect independence and seem associated with an increased risk of death.