Impact of severe polyhandicap cared for at home on French informal caregivers' burden: a cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVES: Polyhandicap (PLH), defined by a combination of profound intellectual impairment and serious motor deficits, is a severe condition with complex disabilities. In France, care of the large majority of PLH individuals is managed in specialised rehabilitation centres or residential facilities, but some of PLH individuals are cared for at home. The aims of this study were to assess the self-perceived burden among informal caregivers of PLH individuals and to identify potential determinants of this burden. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study (Neuropaediatric Department, Trousseau Hospital, Paris, France). SETTINGS: PLH children were recruited from a specialised paediatric/neurological department. PARTICIPANTS: The selection criteria of caregivers were age above 18 years and being the PLH individual's next of kin. OUTCOMES MEASURES: From March 2015 to December 2016, data were collected from the caregivers, including sociodemographical data, health status, psycho-behavioural data (quality of life, mood disorders and coping) and self-perceived burden. In addition, the health status of the PLH individual was collected. Relationships between the burden scores and potential determinants were tested (correlations coefficients, Mann-Whitney tests, generalised estimating equations models). RESULTS: Eighty-four children were eligible; 77 families returned their questionnaire. The informal caregivers of PLH children experienced a high level of perceived burden (scores ranged from 55±20 to 81±12). Eighty per cent of them had more than 5 hours of daily caregiving and 51% of them had to get up more than twice during the night. The main factors associated with caregiver burden were age, financial issues, health status, daily care and coping strategies. The patients' health status was not associated with caregiver burden. CONCLUSIONS: Some of the caregiver burden determinants might be modifiable. These findings should help healthcare workers and health-decision makers implement specific and appropriate interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02400528.

Polyhandicap and aging.

BACKGROUND: Knowledge of the health status and care management of elderly individuals with polyhandicap* is lacking; however, a better understanding of the natural course of ageing in persons with severe and complex disability would help optimize preventive and curative care management strategies. OBJECTIVES: To describe persons with severe and complex disability aged 18-68 years by providing i) a description of their health status and ii) a description of their medications, medical devices and rehabilitation procedures. METHODS: This was an 18-month cross-sectional study including people aged 18-68 years with a combination of severe motor deficiency and profound intellectual impairment. They were recruited from 4 specialized rehabilitation centres, 9 residential facilities, and a neurological department. The following data were collected: aetiology of severe and complex disability, health status, medical devices, and rehabilitation procedures. RESULTS: A total of 474 persons with severe and complex disability were included (N = 219 [18-34 years], N = 151 [35-49 years], N = 104 [50-68] years). The aetiology of severe and complex disability was unknown for 13%-17% of persons with severe and complex disability across the 3 age classes. Behavioural disorders and pain were more frequent in the oldest age classes. Elderly persons with severe and complex disability had more severe but less unstable severe and complex disability. Their neurodevelopmental was close to that of a 4-month-old child without progression across age. Gastrostomy was the most frequent device needed by the persons with severe and complex disability. CONCLUSIONS: The longevity of persons with severe and complex disability is improving; some of these persons, among whom are the least unstable and with less comorbidity, can survive for more than 50 years due to the improvement of preventive actions and supportive care.

Impact of severe polyhandicap on parents' quality of life: A large French cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Polyhandicap (PLH) is a condition of severe and complex disabilities and is defined by a combination of profound intellectual impairment and serious motor deficits. Parents of PLH individuals are chronically confronted with stressful situations. The aims of this study are i) to assess and compare the quality of life (QoL) of a large panel of parents of PLH individuals with age- and gender-matched controls and ii) to identify potential determinants of parents' QoL. METHOD: We conducted a cross-sectional study. Parents were recruited from 4 specialized rehabilitation centres, 9 residential facilities, and a specialized paediatric/neurological department. The selection criteria were age above 18 years and being the mother/father of a PLH individual. The data collected from the parents included sociodemographic, health status, and psycho-behavioural data (including QoL); additionally, the health status of the PLH individuals was collected. RESULTS: The QoL scores of all dimensions were significantly lower for parents than for controls. The main factors modulating parents' QoL were financial issues, health status, and coping strategies. The PLH individuals' health status was not associated with parents' QoL. CONCLUSIONS: Some QoL determinants might be amenable. These findings should help health care workers and health decision makers to implement specific and appropriate interventions.

Adequacy of care management of patients with polyhandicap in the French health system: A study of 782 patients.

BACKGROUND: The aims of this study were 1) to describe the health profiles and care management of polyhandicapped patients according to 2 modalities, specialized rehabilitation centers (SRC) and residential facilities (RF), and 2) to estimate the adequacy of care management of these patients. METHODS: This was an 18-month cross-sectional study including patients with a combination of severe motor deficiency and profound intellectual impairment. The patients were from 4 SRC and 9 RF. The following data were collected: sociodemographics, health status, care management, and adequacy of care management. RESULTS: A total of 782 patients were included: 410 (52%) were cared for in SRC and 372 (48%) in RF. Global objective adequacy (health severity and age category) was higher for patients cared for in SRC compared with patients cared for in RF (57 vs. 44%, p< = 10-3). Global subjective adequacy (self-perception of the referring physician and request of change in structure) was higher for patients cared for in SRC in comparison with patients cared for in RF (98 vs. 92%, p< = 10-3). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides key elements of adequacy of care management modalities for polyhandicapped patients in France. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02400528.

Impact of caring for patients with severe and complex disabilities on health care workers' quality of life: determinants and specificities.

AIM: Individuals with severe and complex disabilities, defined by a combination of profound intellectual impairment and serious motor deficit resulting in extreme dependence, often remain in hospital or at residential facilities. The aim of this study was to identify the determinants of quality of life (QoL) of 238 health care workers (HCWs) caring for individuals with severe and complex disabilities. METHOD: We conducted a cross-sectional study. The recruitment of the HCWs was performed in five French centres specializing in patients with severe and complex disabilities. The selection criteria were age above 18 years, being an institutional referent HCW (a resource person coordinating various issues for or about the patient), and agreeing to participate. Sociodemographic, health, professional variables, and psycho-behavioural (QoL, burn-out, and coping strategies) data were collected. RESULTS: Of the 362 eligible HCWs, 65.7% returned the questionnaires. The scores of the physical and social dimensions of QoL were significantly lower, and the score of the psychological dimension significantly higher, than those of a comparison group. The main factors modulating QoL were age, financial difficulties, nature of coping strategy, and burn-out. INTERPRETATION: This research provides preliminary evidence that caring for patients with severe and complex disabilities affects the QoL of HCWs. These results support the need for optimization of the work environments for HCWs.