Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
3.
Acta Cir Bras ; 37(7): e370702, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36228297

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To demonstrate through a controlled study whether the use of tranexamic acid in bariatric surgeries is effective for bleeding control. METHODS: Prospective, comparative, and double-blind study performed with patients from 18 to 65 years old submitted to bariatric surgery. The selected patients received venous tranexamic acid (TXA) during the induction of anesthesia or not (CG). The anesthesia and thromboprophylaxis protocols were similar among the groups. For statistical analysis, the χ2 and analysis of variance tests were performed at a significance level of p < 0.05, using the statistical program SPSS 21.0®. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients were included in the study, 31 in the control group and 30 in the TXA group (GTXA). In the intraoperative period, the bleeding volume was greater in the CG than in the GTXA. In the postoperative period, the tranexamic acid group had a higher value hematocrit, absence of surgical reoperations due to bleeding complications, and shorter hospitalization time than the control group. CONCLUSIONS: The use of tranexamic acid was effective in reducing bleeding rates and of hospital stay length, in addition to demonstrating the clinical safety of its use, for not having been associated with any thromboembolic events.


Subject(s)
Antifibrinolytic Agents , Laparoscopy , Tranexamic Acid , Venous Thromboembolism , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Antifibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Blood Loss, Surgical/prevention & control , Gastrectomy , Humans , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Postoperative Hemorrhage/drug therapy , Postoperative Hemorrhage/etiology , Postoperative Hemorrhage/prevention & control , Prospective Studies , Tranexamic Acid/therapeutic use , Venous Thromboembolism/complications , Venous Thromboembolism/drug therapy , Venous Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Young Adult
4.
Acta cir. bras ; 37(7): e370702, 2022. tab, ilus
Article in English | LILACS, VETINDEX | ID: biblio-1402970

ABSTRACT

Purpose: To demonstrate through a controlled study whether the use of tranexamic acid in bariatric surgeries is effective for bleeding control. Methods: Prospective, comparative, and double-blind study performed with patients from 18 to 65 years old submitted to bariatric surgery. The selected patients received venous tranexamic acid (TXA) during the induction of anesthesia or not (CG). The anesthesia and thromboprophylaxis protocols were similar among the groups. For statistical analysis, the χ2 and analysis of variance tests were performed at a significance level of p < 0.05, using the statistical program SPSS 21.0®. Results: Sixty-one patients were included in the study, 31 in the control group and 30 in the TXA group (GTXA). In the intraoperative period, the bleeding volume was greater in the CG than in the GTXA. In the postoperative period, the tranexamic acid group had a higher value hematocrit, absence of surgical reoperations due to bleeding complications, and shorter hospitalization time than the control group. Conclusions: The use of tranexamic acid was effective in reducing bleeding rates and of hospital stay length, in addition to demonstrating the clinical safety of its use, for not having been associated with any thromboembolic events.


Subject(s)
Humans , Tranexamic Acid/analysis , Blood Loss, Surgical/prevention & control , Bariatric Surgery/methods , Gastrectomy
5.
Acta Cir Bras ; 35(3): e202000307, 2020 May 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32692798

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To compare the satisfaction levels about the surgery and anesthesia management, and to analyze the postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastroplasty surgeries in a private hospital in Sao Luís-MA. METHODS: The sample consisted of patients undergoing Bypass and Sleeve bariatric surgeries from August 2018 to August 2019, who were in the range of 18 and 70 years old and had not used drugs or presented cardiac arrhythmias, dilated cardiomyopathy, and conduction disorder heart. Data were collected from the evaluation forms and recorded in a form with closed questions. RESULTS: Most patients were female (Bypass - 56% and Sleeve - 67.4%) and aged between 30 and 39 years old (Bypass - 32% and Sleeve - 55.8%). Information (Bypass - 92% and Sleeve - 86.1%) was the highest satisfaction index found. Sleepiness in the immediate postoperative period (Bypass - 92% and Sleeve - 93%) was the main side effect. There were no postoperative complications in patients between the two types of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Patients submitted to Bypass and Sleeve were completely satisfied with the perioperative management. There was no statistically significant difference when comparing adverse effects between the techniques.


Subject(s)
Gastric Bypass , Gastroplasty , Laparoscopy , Obesity, Morbid , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Gastrectomy , Hospitals, Private , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Obesity, Morbid/surgery , Postoperative Complications , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Weight Loss , Young Adult
6.
Acta cir. bras ; 35(3): e202000307, 2020. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1130625

ABSTRACT

Abstract Purpose: To compare the satisfaction levels about the surgery and anesthesia management, and to analyze the postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastroplasty surgeries in a private hospital in Sao Luís-MA. Methods: The sample consisted of patients undergoing Bypass and Sleeve bariatric surgeries from August 2018 to August 2019, who were in the range of 18 and 70 years old and had not used drugs or presented cardiac arrhythmias, dilated cardiomyopathy, and conduction disorder heart. Data were collected from the evaluation forms and recorded in a form with closed questions. Results: Most patients were female (Bypass - 56% and Sleeve - 67.4%) and aged between 30 and 39 years old (Bypass - 32% and Sleeve - 55.8%). Information (Bypass - 92% and Sleeve - 86.1%) was the highest satisfaction index found. Sleepiness in the immediate postoperative period (Bypass - 92% and Sleeve - 93%) was the main side effect. There were no postoperative complications in patients between the two types of surgery. Conclusions: Patients submitted to Bypass and Sleeve were completely satisfied with the perioperative management. There was no statistically significant difference when comparing adverse effects between the techniques.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Young Adult , Obesity, Morbid/surgery , Gastric Bypass , Gastroplasty , Laparoscopy , Postoperative Complications , Weight Loss , Retrospective Studies , Hospitals, Private , Treatment Outcome , Gastrectomy , Middle Aged
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...