Patterns of progression on first line osimertinib in patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A Swiss cohort study.

AIM: Osimertinib is a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) approved for patients with EGFR mutated non-small cell lung cancer as first-line treatment. However, treatment resistance inevitably emerges and may present as oligo-progressive disease (OPD) or systemic progressive disease (SPD). The incidence of OPD on first-line osimertinib is unknown. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients who received first-line osimertinib at 13 Swiss centers. The rate of OPD (PD in ≤ 5 lesions) and treatment outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: The median age of the 148 patients was 68.2 years (range. 38.0-93.3). There were 62 % females, 83 % with a PS ≤ 1, 59 % never smokers, 57 % of patients with an EGFR exon 19 deletion and 37 % with EGFR p.L858R exon 21. 77 % experienced OPD. Median overall survival (OS) was 51.6 months (95 % CI, 38.4-65.0). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 19.2 (95 % CI, 14.3-23.5) and 8.7 (95 % CI, 2.8-15.6) months for patients with common and uncommon EGFR mutations. Patients with OPD compared to SPD had a significantly longer time to treatment failure and longer OS of (22.9 vs. 10.8 months, p < 0.001 and 51.6 vs. 26.4 months, p = 0.004, respectively). The most common organ sites of PD were lung (62 %), brain (30 %), lymph nodes (30 %), bone (27 %) and pleura (27 %). Twenty-six patients (45 %) with OPD received local ablative treatment (LAT). The OS of OPD patients with LAT was 60.0 (95 % CI, 51.6-NA) vs. 51.4 (95 % CI 38.4-65.3) months (p = 0.43) without LAT. CONCLUSION: The rate of OPD of patients receiving first line osimertinib was 77 %. Patients with OPD had a significantly better OS compared to patients with SPD (51.6 vs. 26.4 months). Patients with OPD receiving LAT had the longest median OS (60.0 months).

SAKK57/16 Nab-paclitaxel and Gemcitabine in Soft Tissue Sarcoma (NAPAGE): a phase I/II trial.

BACKGROUND: To determine whether the combination of nab-paclitaxel with gemcitabine has activity in patients with pretreated soft tissue sarcoma (STS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: NAPAGE is a phase Ib/II clinical trial investigating the combination of nab-paclitaxel (nab-pc) with gemcitabine employing two cohorts. One of a dose-de-escalation phase and one of expansion. In phase I, nab-pc was given at 150 mg/m2 in combination with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 every two weeks, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. This dose was recommended for phase II (RP2D), as there was no dose limiting toxicity (DLT) or discontinuations due to adverse events (AEs). The primary endpoint of the phase II was progression-free rate (PFR) at 3 months (H0: 20%, H1:40%). The secondary endpoints included progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), AEs, objective response and patient-reported outcomes (PRO). Efficacy analysis was by intention to treat. RESULTS: The 3-month PFR was 56.4% (95% confidence interval CI: 39.6-72.2%). The 3-month and 6-month PFS were 58.4% (95% CI: 41.3-72.1%) and 44.6% (95% CI: 28.4-59.5%), respectively. Median PFS was 5.3 months (95% CI: 1.4-8.2) and median OS was 12.8 months (95% CI: 10.5-39.2). The most common treatment-related grade ≥ 3 AE were neutropenia (18%), followed by anemia (2.6%), hypertension (2.6%) and alanine aminotransferase increase (2.6%). Grade 1 and grade 2 peripheral sensory neuropathy (PNP) occurred in 15.4% and 20.5%, respectively. No grade 3-4 PNP was reported. CONCLUSIONS: Combining nab-pc and gemcitabine is safe. Promising activity is observed in pretreated STS patients with manageable toxicity. This regimen should be considered for further exploration.

Improving the turnaround time of molecular profiling for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Outcome of a new algorithm integrating multiple approaches.

BACKGROUND: Molecular tumor profiling to identify oncogenic drivers and actionable mutations has a profound impact on how lung cancer is treated. Especially in the subgroup of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), molecular testing for certain mutations is crucial in daily clinical practice and is recommended by international guidelines. To date, a standardized approach to identify druggable genetic alterations are lacking. We have developed and implemented a new diagnostic algorithm to harmonize the molecular testing of NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, we reviewed 119 patients diagnosed with NSCLC at the University Hospital Zurich. Tumor samples were analyzed using our standardized diagnostic algorithm: After the histological diagnosis was made, tissue samples were further analyzed by immunohistochemical stainings as well as the real-time PCR test Idylla™. Extracted DNA was further utilized for comprehensive genomic profiling (FoundationOne®CDx, F1CDx). RESULTS: Out of the 119 patients were included in this study, 100 patients were diagnosed with non-squamous NSCLC (nsqNSCLC) and 19 with squamous NSCLC (sqNSCLC). The samples from the nsqNSCLC patients underwent testing by Idylla™ and were evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC). F1CDx analysis was run on 67 samples and 46 potentially actionable genomic alterations were detected. Ten patients received the indicated targeted treatment. The median time to test results was 4 days for the Idylla test, 5 days for IHC and 13 days for the F1CDx. CONCLUSION: In patients with NSCLC, the implementation of a standardized molecular testing algorithm provided information on predictive markers for NSCLC within a few working days. The implementation of broader genomic profiling led to the identification of actionable targets, which would otherwise not have been discovered.

How to read a next-generation sequencing report-what oncologists need to know.

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) of tumor cell-derived DNA/RNA to screen for targetable genomic alterations is now widely available and has become part of routine practice in oncology. NGS testing strategies depend on cancer type, disease stage and the impact of results on treatment selection. The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) has recently published recommendations for the use of NGS in patients with advanced cancer. We complement the ESMO recommendations with a practical review of how oncologists should read and interpret NGS reports. A concise and straightforward NGS report contains details of the tumor sample, the technology used and highlights not only the most important and potentially actionable results, but also other pathogenic alterations detected. Variants of unknown significance should also be listed. Interpretation of NGS reports should be a joint effort between molecular pathologists, tumor biologists and clinicians. Rather than relying and acting on the information provided by the NGS report, oncologists need to obtain a basic level of understanding to read and interpret NGS results. Comprehensive annotated databases are available for clinicians to review the information detailed in the NGS report. Molecular tumor boards do not only stimulate debate and exchange, but may also help to interpret challenging reports and to ensure continuing medical education.

A randomised phase II study of osimertinib and bevacizumab versus osimertinib alone as second-line targeted treatment in advanced NSCLC with confirmed EGFR and acquired T790M mutations: the European Thoracic Oncology Platform (ETOP 10-16) BOOSTER trial.

BACKGROUND: While osimertinib, a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) is the standard treatment in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with sensitising EGFR and acquired T790M mutations, progression inevitably occurs. The angiogenic pathway is implicated in EGFR TKI resistance. PATIENTS AND METHODS: BOOSTER is an open-label randomised phase II trial investigating the efficacy and safety of combined osimertinib 80 mg daily and bevacizumab 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks, versus osimertinib alone, in patients with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC and acquired T790M mutations after failure on previous EGFR TKI therapy. Primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Between May 2017 and February 2019, 155 patients were randomised (combination: 78; osimertinib: 77). At data cut-off of 22 February 2021, median follow-up was 33.8 months [interquartile range (IQR): 26.5-37.6 months] and 129 (83.2%) PFS events were reported in the intention-to-treat population. There was no difference in median PFS between the combination [15.4 months; 95% confidence interval (CI) 9.2-18.0 months] and osimertinib arm (12.3 months; 95% CI 6.2-17.2 months; stratified log-rank P = 0.83), [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.96; 95% CI 0.68-1.37]. Median OS was 24.0 months (95% CI 17.8-32.1 months) in the combination arm and 24.3 months (95% CI 16.9-37.0 months) in the osimertinib arm (stratified log-rank P = 0.91), (HR = 1.03; 95% CI 0.67-1.56). Exploratory analysis revealed a significant interaction of smoking history with treatment for PFS (adjusted P = 0.0052) with a HR of 0.52 (95% CI 0.30-0.90) for smokers, and 1.47 (95% CI 0.92-2.33) for never smokers. ORR was 55% in both arms and the median time to treatment failure was significantly shorter in the combination than in the osimertinib arm, 8.2 months versus 10.8 months, respectively (P = 0.0074). Safety of osimertinib and bevacizumab was consistent with previous reports with grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) reported in 47% and 18% of patients on combination and osimertinib alone, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: No difference in PFS was observed between osimertinib plus bevacizumab and osimertinib alone. Grade ≥3 TRAEs were more common in patients on combination.

The Role of the Liquid Biopsy in Decision-Making for Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Liquid biopsy is a rapidly emerging tool of precision oncology enabling minimally invasive molecular diagnostics and longitudinal monitoring of treatment response. For the clinical management of advanced stage lung cancer patients, detection and quantification of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is now widely adopted into clinical practice. Still, interpretation of results and validation of ctDNA-based treatment decisions remain challenging. We report here our experience implementing liquid biopsies into the clinical management of lung cancer. We discuss advantages and limitations of distinct ctDNA assay techniques and highlight our approach to the analysis of recurrent molecular alterations found in lung cancer. Moreover, we report three exemplary clinical cases illustrating the complexity of interpreting liquid biopsy results in clinical practice. These cases underscore the potential and current limitations of liquid biopsy, focusing on the difficulty of interpreting discordant findings. In our view, despite all current limitations, the analysis of ctDNA in lung cancer patients is an essential and highly versatile complementary diagnostic tool for the clinical management of lung cancer patients in the era of precision oncology.

Patterns of progression on osimertinib in EGFR T790M positive NSCLC: A Swiss cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Osimertinib is an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with antitumor activity in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR T790 M mutations. The incidence of oligo-progression (PD) on osimertinib is unknown. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 50 pre-treated EGFR T790M-positive NSCLC patients treated with osimertinib at seven Swiss centers. Oligo-PD was defined as PD in ≤ 5 lesions. Mutational profiling of pre- and post-osimertinib tumor samples was performed. RESULTS: Median age was 62 years (37-89), 64% were females, 86% had a PS ≤ 1, 54%/13% were never/current smokers. Median follow-up was 15.3 (IQR: 8.6-21.6) months. Overall response rate was 80%, median progression-free survival 12.1 months (95% CI 8.3-18.3), median overall survival 28 months (95% CI 20.2-not reached [NR]) and median treatment duration 18.8 months (95%CI 16-8-NR). PD occurred in 36 patients (72%). 73% had oligo-PD. Median osimertinib treatment duration in patients with oligo-PD was 19.6 vs. 7 months if systemic PD (p = 0.007). The number of progressive lesions in patients with oligo-PD was 1 (27%), 2 (35%) and 3-5 (39%). Sites of PD included lungs (56%), bones (44%), and brain (17%). Sixteen patients with oligo-PD continued treatment with osimertinib for a median of 6.7 months beyond PD. Thirteen received local ablative treatment (LAT). In pre- and post-PD tumor tissue multiple molecular alterations were detected. CONCLUSION: In patients with acquired resistance to osimertinib, we observed a high rate (73%) of oligo-PD. Outcomes of patients receiving LAT were favorable, supporting the concept of osimertinib treatment beyond progression in combination with LAT of progressing lesions.

Identification of the p53 family-responsive element in the promoter region of the tumor suppressor gene hypermethylated in cancer 1.

The tumor suppressor gene hypermethylated in cancer 1 (HIC1), located on human chromosome 17p13.3, is frequently silenced in cancer by epigenetic mechanisms. Hypermethylated in cancer 1 belongs to the bric à brac/poxviruses and zinc-finger family of transcription factors and acts by repressing target gene expression. It has been shown that enforced p53 expression leads to increased HIC1 mRNA, and recent data suggest that p53 and Hic1 cooperate in tumorigenesis. In order to elucidate the regulation of HIC1 expression, we have analysed the HIC1 promoter region for p53-dependent induction of gene expression. Using progressively truncated luciferase reporter gene constructs, we have identified a p53-responsive element (PRE) 500 bp upstream of the TATA-box containing promoter P0 of HIC1, which is sequence specifically bound by p53 in vitro as assessed by electrophoretic mobility shift assays. We demonstrate that this HIC1 p53-responsive element (HIC1.PRE) is necessary and sufficient to mediate induction of transcription by p53. This result is supported by the observation that abolishing endogenous wild-type p53 function prevents HIC1 mRNA induction in response to UV-induced DNA damage. Other members of the p53 family, notably TAp73beta and DeltaNp63alpha, can also act through this HIC1.PRE to induce transcription of HIC1, and finally, hypermethylation of the HIC1 promoter attenuates inducibility by p53.