Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Cent Eur J Public Health ; 29(2): 153-158, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34245556

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The paper analyses real-world data on cost of treatment in patients after stroke hospitalized in early rehabilitation units within comprehensive stroke centres in the Czech Republic. This is the first study of the kind in the Czech Republic, while such information is extremely rare worldwide. Stroke treatment witnessed a dramatic development in the last years, when the main progress was due to establishment of specialized (comprehensive) stroke units incorporating also early rehabilitation. There is a general agreement among clinicians that early rehabilitation is beneficial for patients after stroke. METHODS: Costs of early rehabilitation after stroke were calculated by the micro-costing method alongside a pragmatic study in three Czech hospitals. Patients were transferred to specialized early rehabilitation units usually on 7th to 14th day after stroke onset and received four hours of interprofessional rehabilitation per day. RESULTS: The analysis of data collected during the prospective observational research of 87 patients proved significant differences between patients. The average costs of hospitalization were determined to be CZK 5,104 (EUR 194) per one day of intensive rehabilitation in seriously affected patients early after stroke. These costs differed significantly between hospitals (p-value < 0.001); the structure of direct costs was quite stable, though. About 60% of these costs were due to nursing and overhead, while no more than 15% were consumed by therapists. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment of patients after stroke in specialized stroke units proved to be beneficial for the patients increasing the number of those re-integrated in family and community life.


Subject(s)
Hospitalization , Stroke , Costs and Cost Analysis , Czech Republic , Humans
2.
Int J Rehabil Res ; 43(4): 376-382, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32991353

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this prospective study was to determine whether the cost and cost-effectiveness of early rehabilitation after stroke are associated with the degree of initial disability. The data for cost calculations were collected by the bottom-up (micro-costing) method alongside the standard inpatient care. The total sample included 87 patients who were transferred from acute care to early rehabilitation unit of three participating stroke centers at the median time poststroke of 11 days (range 4-69 days). The study was pragmatic so that all hospitals followed their standard therapeutic procedures. For each patient, the staff recorded each procedure and the associated time over the hospital stay. The cost and cost-effectiveness were compared between four disability categories. The average cost of the entire hospitalization was CZK 114 489 (EUR 4348) with the daily average of CZK 5103 (EUR 194). The cost was 2.4 times higher for the immobile category (CZK/EU: 167 530/6363) than the self-sufficient category (CZK/EUR: 68 825/2614), and the main driver of the increase was the cost of nursing. The motor status had a much greater influence than cognitive status. We conclude that the cost and cost-effectiveness of early rehabilitation after stroke are positively associated with the degree of the motor but not cognitive disability. To justify the cost of rehabilitation and monitor its effectiveness, it is recommended to systematically record the elements of care provided and perform functional assessments on admission and discharge.


Subject(s)
Disability Evaluation , Hospitalization/economics , Stroke Rehabilitation/economics , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Czech Republic , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies
3.
Adv Clin Exp Med ; 28(7): 923-929, 2019 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31106529

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite the high volume of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) examinations, there is limited awareness about its risks among patients and little is known about the influence of patient information sheets. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to assess patients' awareness and perception of risks related to CECT examination and how they are influenced by an information sheet. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 263 adult patients scheduled for a CECT examination completed a questionnaire. The first page evaluated patients' characteristics, their fear and awareness about examination-related risks, and source of information. Page 2 contained the Zung self-rating anxiety scale. After reading the information sheet, patients completed page 3 that surveyed how their awareness and fear had changed. RESULTS: Nearly half of the patients underestimated the risk of secondary malignancy (n = 121, 46%), or the risk of renal impairment (n = 110, 42%). The vast majority (n = 227, 86%) stated that they were not instructed to maintain fluid intake up to 1 h before the procedure. After reading the information sheet, patients generally corrected their knowledge, but 195 (74%) reported experiencing greater fear (p < 0.0001). Fear was more pronounced in younger female patients who had not undergone CT previously. Patients feared the result more than examination-related risks. Most patients (n = 204, 78%) would feel uncomfortable before receiving the examination result. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients do not assess risks related to CECT examination correctly. Although the information sheet improves patients' understanding of CECT-related risks, it lacks empathically delivered reassurance and increases their fear. Fast communication of examination results would make patients feel more comfortable.


Subject(s)
Communication , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Multidetector Computed Tomography/adverse effects , Patient Compliance , Patient Preference , Adult , Aged , Awareness , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Multidetector Computed Tomography/methods , Patient Education as Topic , Radiation Exposure , Surveys and Questionnaires
4.
Curr Drug Metab ; 18(7): 636-642, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28524005

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Rivaroxaban represents a selective direct inhibitor of activated coagulation factor X (FXa) having peroral bioavailability and prompt onset of action. OBJECTIVE: The absorbtion of rivaroxaban is quick, reaching maximum plasma concentration 2-4 hours following its administration. Peroral bioavailability is high (80-100 %) and pharmacokinetic variability is considered to be moderate (coefficient of variation 30-40 %). This review discusses the properties, drug interactions, pharmacokinetics and clinical indications of rivaroxaban. METHOD: Dosing regimen of rivaroxaban was derived from pharmacologic data of the development program aimed to gain strong antithrombotic drug and balance between efficacy and risk of bleeding in patients. Results of doseranging trials, pharmacokinetic models and randomised studies of phase III advocate the use of such schemes in everyday practice. RESULTS: The drug has been manufactured to fulfill clinical requirements in a variety of indications in adults: prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) following elective knee or hip replacement surgical intervention, therapy and secondary prophylaxis of VTE, prophylaxis of ischemic stroke and embolism in individuals diagnosed with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) with risky characteristics, and in Europe the prophylaxis of atherothrombotic episodes following an acute coronary syndrome in subjects with increased levels of cardiac biomarkers. CONCLUSION: Rivaroxaban may offer benefit in many clinical situations. In comparison with low molecular weight heparin and fondaparinux requiring subcutaneous way of administration, and with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), which require regular monitoring of international normalized ratio, rivaroxaban is relatively easy to use. However, adjustments of dose are needed in individuals with impaired renal functions.


Subject(s)
Factor Xa Inhibitors , Rivaroxaban , Drug Interactions , Factor Xa Inhibitors/pharmacokinetics , Factor Xa Inhibitors/pharmacology , Humans , Rivaroxaban/pharmacokinetics , Rivaroxaban/pharmacology
5.
Wien Klin Wochenschr ; 129(5-6): 159-163, 2017 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27325213

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Computed tomography (CT) is widely available in most hospitals, usually 24 h a day, which results in an expansion of its indications, sometimes beyond medically justifiable extent. AIM: To evaluate trends in emergency cranial CTs in a general university hospital during the last 15 years. METHODS: We conducted a database search for emergency cranial CTs between January 2000 and December 2015 that were performed in patients after head injury on weekends and bank holidays and between 8 P.M. and 6 A.M. on workdays. The numbers were compared with demographic data, the number of hospital beds, and total number of CT examinations. RESULTS: The annual number of emergency cranial CTs increased 5.5 times from 124 to 679 with a sharp increase since 2013. This trend showed a negative correlation with the number of hospital beds (r = -0.88, p = 0.0001), the proportion of important findings on cranial CT (r = -0.74, p = 0.0010), or the proportion of patients indicated for cranial CT by NICE 2014 criteria (r = -0.90, p < 0.0001) and positive correlation with the proportion of inebriated patients (r = 0.94, p < 0.0001), and their average GCS score (r = 0.92, p < 0.0001). Compared to the number of emergency cranial CTs, the slope of regression lines for all trends was significantly different (p < 0.001) apart from the number of inebriated patients (p = 0.062). CONCLUSIONS: The increase in the emergency cranial CTs cannot be entirely justified by their clinical need. We assume that this is the result of an absent support of adherence to the guidelines in the legislation together with a medicolegally unpredictable environment.


Subject(s)
Craniocerebral Trauma/diagnostic imaging , Craniocerebral Trauma/epidemiology , Emergency Medical Services/statistics & numerical data , Hospital Bed Capacity/statistics & numerical data , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/statistics & numerical data , Unnecessary Procedures/statistics & numerical data , After-Hours Care/statistics & numerical data , Czech Republic/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Needs Assessment , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Utilization Review
6.
PeerJ ; 4: e1883, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27069813

ABSTRACT

Purpose. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the technical and diagnostic performance of sub-milliSievert ultralow-dose (ULD) CT colonograpy (CTC) in the detection of colonic and extracolonic lesions. Materials and Methods. CTC with standard dose (SD) and ULD acquisitions of 64 matched patients, half of them with colonic findings, were reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP), hybrid (HIR) and iterative model reconstruction techniques (IMR). Image noise in six colonic segments, in the left psoas muscle and aorta were measured. Image quality of the left adrenal gland and of the colon in the endoscopic and 2D view was rated on a five point Likert scale by two observers, who also completed the reading of CTC for colonic and extracolonic findings. Results. The mean radiation dose estimate was 4.1 ± 1.4 mSv for SD and 0.86 ± 0.17 mSv for ULD for both positions (p < 0.0001). In ULD-IMR, SD-IMR and SD-HIR, the endoluminal noise was decreased in all colonic segments compared to SD-FBP (p < 0.001). There were 27 small (6-9 mm) and 17 large (≥10 mm) colonic lesions that were classified as sessile polyps (n = 38), flat lesions (n = 3), or as a mass (n = 3). Per patient sensitivity and specificity were 0.82 and 0.93 for ULD-FBP, 0.97 and 0.97 for ULD-HIR, 0.97 and 1.0 for ULD-IMR. Per polyp sensitivity was 0.84 for ULD-FBP, 0.98 for ULD-HIR, 0.98 for ULD-IMR. Significantly less extracolonic findings were detected in ULD-FBP and ULD-HIR, but in the E4 category by C-RADS (potentially important findings), the detection was similar. Conclusion. Both HIR and IMR are suitable for sub-milliSievert ULD CTC without sacrificing diagnostic performance of the study.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...