Patient and normal three-dimensional eye-movement responses to maintained (DC) surface galvanic vestibular stimulation.

HYPOTHESIS: That disease or dysfunction of vestibular end organs in human patients will reduce or eliminate the contribution of the affected end organs to the total eye-movement response to DC surface galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS). BACKGROUND: It was assumed that DC GVS (at current of 5 mA) stimulates all vestibular end organs, an assumption that is strongly supported by physiological evidence, including the activation of primary vestibular afferent neurons by galvanic stimulation. Previous studies also have described the oculomotor responses to vestibular activation. Stimulation of individual semicircular canals results in eye movements parallel to the plane of the stimulated canal, and stimulation of the utricular macula produces changes in ocular torsional position. It was also assumed that the total three-dimensional eye-movement response to GVS is the sum of the contributions of the oculomotor drive of all the vestibular end organs. If a particular vestibular end organ were to be diseased or dysfunctional, it was reasoned that its contribution to the GVS-induced oculomotor response would be reduced or absent and that patients thus affected would have a systematic difference in their GVS-induced oculomotor response compared with the response of normal healthy individuals. METHODS: Three-dimensional video eye-movement recording was carried out in complete darkness on normal healthy subjects and patients with various types of vestibular dysfunction, as diagnosed by independent vestibular clinical tests. The eye-movement response to long-duration bilateral and unilateral surface GVS was measured. RESULTS: The pattern of horizontal, vertical, and torsional eye velocity and eye position during GVS of patients independently diagnosed with bilateral vestibular dysfunction, unilateral vestibular dysfunction, CHARGE syndrome (semicircular canal hypoplasia), semicircular canal occlusion, or inferior vestibular neuritis differed systematically from the responses of normal healthy subjects in ways that corresponded to the expectations from the conceptual approach of the study. CONCLUSION: The study reports the first data on the differences between the normal response to GVS and those of patients with a number of clinical vestibular conditions including unilateral vestibular loss, canal block, and vestibular neuritis. The GVS-induced eye-movement patterns of patients with vestibular dysfunction are consistent with the reduction or absence of oculomotor contribution from the end organs implicated in their particular disease condition.

Maintained ocular torsion produced by bilateral and unilateral galvanic (DC) vestibular stimulation in humans.

This study was designed to measure ocular movements evoked by galvanic (DC) stimulation using computerised video-oculography. Long duration (>30 s) galvanic vestibular stimulation at currents of up to 5 mA through large-area surface electrodes over the mastoid processes causes maintained changes in the ocular torsional position of both eyes in healthy human subjects. With the subject seated and the head held firmly, torsion was measured by a computer-based image-processing system (VTM). Torsion was recorded in darkness, with or without a single fixation point. With bilateral stimulation, the upper poles of both eyes always torted away from the side of cathode placement and toward the anode. For unilateral stimulation, torsion was directed away from the cathode or toward the anode. The magnitude of ocular torsion was dependent on current strength: with bilateral stimulation the peak torsion was on average 2.88 degrees for 5-mA current intensity compared with 1.58 degrees for 3 mA. A smaller amplitude of torsion was obtained for unilateral stimulation. The average peak torsion was the same for both eyes for all forms of stimulation. Our findings indicate that low-intensity galvanic stimulation evokes ocular torsion in normal subjects, an effect which is consistent with an action on otolith afferents.

Unilateral vestibular deafferentation produces no long-term effects on human active eye-head coordination.

We tested the hypothesis that the reason some patients compensate well after unilateral vestibular deafferentation (uVD) and others do not could be due to differences in eye-head coordination or in blink characteristics during natural, active head movements. Patients with well-compensated uVDs do not report distressing postural unsteadiness or an aversive sensation of apparent motion of a visual scene (oscillopsia) or "visual confusion" upon rapid head rotation as do those patients with poorly compensated uVDs. It has been suggested that well-compensated subjects eliminate the subjective sensations associated with retinal slip, which must occur as a result of an inadequate vestibuloocular reflex (VOR), either by restricting head movement to the lesioned side or by blinking during head turns. To test this, subjects stood at the curbside of a busy road with a 180 degrees view of regular, fast-moving traffic, which they scanned in preparation of crossing the road, and their eye and head movements and blinks were measured in this natural situation. Both normals and uVDs generated similar ranges of head position, head velocity and gaze magnitude, and all subjects performed a blink during the gaze saccade. Contrary to the hypothesis, no systematic differences were found between normals and either group of uVDs.