Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 101(5): 384-391, 2019 Mar 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30845032

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Preoperative opioid use results in adverse outcomes and higher costs after elective surgery. However, duration thresholds for higher risk are not entirely known. Therefore, the purpose of our study was to determine the number and duration of preoperative opioid prescriptions in order to estimate the risk of postoperative adverse events after major joint replacement and lumbar fusion. METHODS: National insurance claims data (2007 to September 30, 2015) were used to identify primary total knee arthroplasties (TKAs), total hip arthroplasties (THAs), and 1 or 2-level posterior lumbar fusions (PLFs) performed for degenerative disease. The effect of preoperative opioid burden (naive, ≤3 months, >3 to 6 months, >6 months but stopped 3 months before surgery, and >6 months of continuous use) on the risks of various adverse outcomes was studied using Cox proportional hazards analysis with adjustment for demographic and clinical covariates. RESULTS: A total of 58,082 patients stratified into 3 cohorts of 32,667 with TKA, 14,734 with THA, and 10,681 with 1 or 2-level PLF were included for this analysis. A duration of preoperative opioids of >3 months was associated with a higher risk of 90-day emergency department (ED) visits for all causes and readmission after TKA. Preoperative opioid prescription for >6 months was associated with a higher risk of all-cause and pain-related ED visits, wound dehiscence/infection, and hospital readmission within 90 days as well as revision surgery within 1 year after TKA, THA, and PLF. Stopping the opioid prescription 3 months preoperatively for chronic users resulted in a significant reduction in the risk of adverse outcomes, with the greatest impact seen after THA and PLF. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a preoperative opioid prescription for up to 3 months before a major arthroplasty or a 1 or 2-level lumbar fusion had a similar risk of adverse outcomes as opioid-naive patients. While >6 months of opioid use was associated with a higher risk of adverse outcomes, a 3-month prescription-free period before the surgery appeared to mitigate this risk for chronic users. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Accidental Falls/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain, Postoperative/chemically induced , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Postoperative Complications/chemically induced , Preoperative Care/statistics & numerical data , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sepsis/chemically induced , Surgical Wound Dehiscence/chemically induced , Surgical Wound Infection/chemically induced , Time Factors , Venous Thrombosis/chemically induced
2.
Clin Spine Surg ; 32(3): 113-119, 2019 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30628923

ABSTRACT

Our objective was to describe the incidence, causes, risk factors, and costs associated with 30-day emergency department (ED) visits after primary lumbar fusion. A national insurance database was retrospectively analyzed to study patients with primary lumbar fusions performed for degenerative pathology of the spine between 2007 and Q3-2015. Risk factors for ED visits, and ED to hospital transfer were studied using multiple-variable logistic regression analysis. Our cohort included 37,559 patients with a mean age of 66.0±10.0 years. A total of 4806 (12.8%) patients had 10,281 ED visits within 30 days after surgery. Of these, 945 (19.9%) had multiple (≥3) visits, and 1466 (30.5%) were admitted to the hospital for management. Common causes for presentation in the ED were cardiorespiratory complaints (49.4%, n=2377), and back and/or leg pain (47.7%, n=2294). Risk factors for all ED visits, multiple ED visits, and hospital admission from the ED have been identified. The overall ED cost burden was nearly two-thirds as much as hospital readmissions within 30 days ($6,994,260 vs. $10,880,999). There is a sizable subset of patients that present to the ED for acute care but do not require hospitalization. Causes and risk factors for presentation in patients with multiple ED visits are somewhat different than patients requiring hospital readmission.


Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Lumbar Vertebrae , Patient Readmission , Spinal Fusion , Aged , Cohort Studies , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Emergency Service, Hospital/economics , Female , Humans , Incidence , Insurance Claim Review , Male , Postoperative Complications/economics , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Risk Factors , United States/epidemiology
3.
Spine J ; 18(11): 1989-1998, 2018 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29709553

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: As health-care transitions to value-based models, there has been an increased focus on patient factors that can influence peri- and postoperative adverse events, resource use, and costs. Many studies have reported risk factors for systemic complications after cervical fusion, but none have studied chronic opioid therapy (COT) as a risk factor. PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to answer the following questions from a large cohort of patients who underwent primary cervical fusion for degenerative pathology: (1) What is the patient profile associated with preoperative COT? (2) Is preoperative COT a risk factor for 90-day systemic complications, emergency department (ED) visits, readmission, and 1-year adverse events? (3) What are the risk factors and 1-year adverse events related to long-term postoperative opioid use? (4) How much did payers reimburse for management of complications and adverse events? STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective review of Humana commercial insurance data (2007-Q3 2015). PATIENT SAMPLE: The patient sample included 29,101 patients undergoing primary cervical fusion for degenerative pathology. METHODS: Patients and procedures of interest were included using International Classification of Diseases (ICD) coding. Patients with opioid prescriptions for >6 months before surgery were considered as having preoperative COT. Patients with continued opioid use until 1-year after surgery were considered as long-term users. Descriptive analysis of patient cohorts has been done. Multiple-variable logistic regression analyses adjusting for approach, number of levels of surgery, discharge disposition, and comorbidities were done to answer first three study questions. Reimbursement data from insurers have been reported to answer our fourth study question. RESULTS: Of the entire cohort, 6,643 (22.8%) had preoperative COT. Preoperative COT was associated with a higher risk of 90-day wound complications (odds ratio [OR] 1.39, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.16-1.66), all-cause 90-day ED visits (adjusted OR 1.22, 95% CI: 1.13-1.32), and pain-related ED visits (adjusted OR 1.39, 95% CI: 1.24-1.55). Patients who had preoperative COT were more likely to receive epidural or facet joint injections within 1 year after surgery (adjusted OR 1.68, 95% CI: 1.47-1.92). These patients were also more likely to undergo a repeat cervical fusion within a year than patients who did not have preoperative COT (adjusted OR 1.21, 95% CI: 1.01-1.43). Preoperative COT had a higher likelihood of long-term use after surgery (adjusted OR 4.72, 95% CI: 4.41-5.06). Long-term opioid use after surgery was associated with a higher risk of new-onsetconstipation (adjusted OR 1.34, 95% CI: 1.22-1.48). The risk of complications and adverse events was not found to be significant in patients with <3 months of preoperative opioid use or those who stopped opioids for at least 6 weeks before surgery. The cost of additional resource use for medications, ED visits, constipation, injections, and revision fusion ranged from $623 to $27,360 per patient. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative opioid use among patients who underwent cervical fusion increases complication rates, postoperative opioid usage, health-care resource use, and costs. These risks may be reduced by restricting the duration of preoperative opioid use or weaning off before surgery. Better understanding and management of pain in the preoperative period with judicious use of opioids is critical to enhance outcomes after cervical fusion surgery.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Drug Utilization/statistics & numerical data , Intervertebral Disc Degeneration/surgery , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Adult , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Cervical Vertebrae/surgery , Costs and Cost Analysis , Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Intervertebral Disc Degeneration/drug therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/economics , Preoperative Period , Risk Factors
4.
Adv Healthc Mater ; 4(5): 702-13, 2015 Apr 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25607633

ABSTRACT

Healing articular cartilage remains a significant clinical challenge because of its limited self-healing capacity. While delivery of autologous chondrocytes to cartilage defects has received growing interest, combining cell-based therapies with scaffolds that capture aspects of native tissue and promote cell-mediated remodeling could improve outcomes. Currently, scaffold-based therapies with encapsulated chondrocytes permit matrix production; however, resorption of the scaffold does not match the rate of production by cells leading to generally low extracellular matrix outputs. Here, a poly (ethylene glycol) (PEG) norbornene hydrogel is functionalized with thiolated transforming growth factor (TGF-ß1) and cross-linked by an MMP-degradable peptide. Chondrocytes are co-encapsulated with a smaller population of mesenchymal stem cells, with the goal of stimulating matrix production and increasing bulk mechanical properties of the scaffold. The co-encapsulated cells cleave the MMP-degradable target sequence more readily than either cell population alone. Relative to non-degradable gels, cellularly degraded materials show significantly increased glycosaminoglycan and collagen deposition over just 14 d of culture, while maintaining high levels of viability and producing a more widely-distributed matrix. These results indicate the potential of an enzymatically degradable, peptide-functionalized PEG hydrogel to locally influence and promote cartilage matrix production over a short period. Scaffolds that permit cell-mediated remodeling may be useful in designing treatment options for cartilage tissue engineering applications.


Subject(s)
Cartilage, Articular/cytology , Chondrocytes/drug effects , Hydrogels/chemistry , Polyethylene Glycols/chemistry , Tissue Engineering/methods , Animals , Cells, Cultured , Chondrocytes/metabolism , Coculture Techniques , Collagen , Extracellular Matrix/metabolism , Humans , Hydrogels/pharmacology , Matrix Metalloproteinases/metabolism , Polyethylene Glycols/pharmacology , Swine , Tissue Scaffolds/chemistry , Transforming Growth Factor beta1
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...