Body composition after endoscopic lung volume reduction with endobronchial valves: A prospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and emphysema experience malnutrition and pulmonary cachexia. Endoscopic lung volume reduction (ELVR) with endobronchial valves has not only improved lung function, exercise capacity, and quality of life, but also influenced body weight. Only a few data are available on body composition changes after ELVR. METHODS: This single-center prospective study of patients with advanced COPD investigates body composition before and after endoscopic valve treatment using multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). The following parameters were evaluated in addition to clinical data and routine tests: body weight, body mass index (BMI), basal metabolic rate, total body water, body fat, cell percentage, phase angle, intracellular water (ICW), extracellular water (ECW), extracellular mass (ECM), body cell mas (BCM), lean body mass (LBM = ECM + BCM) and fat-free mass index. RESULTS: A total of 23 patients (mean emphysema index 37.2 ± 7.5 %, BMI 23.4 ± 4.3 kg/m²) experienced improvements in lung function and exercise capacity with ELVR. Complete lobar atelectasis was achieved in 39.1% of participants. A non-statistically significant increase in body weight and BMI was observed after ELVR (p = 0.111 and p = 0.102). BIA measurement revealed a worsening of phase angle, cell percentage and ECM/BCM and thus of body composition, but without statistical significance. This is mainly due to a statistically significant increase in ECM, ECW, and ICW (all p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: ELVR demonstrated no beneficial changes in body composition, although patients tend to gain weight. A larger cohort is warranted to confirm these findings. .

Analysis of body composition with bioelectrical impedance analysis in patients with severe COPD and pulmonary emphysema.

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) often suffer from cachexia and malnutrition. Less is known about body composition and nutritional behaviour in patients with advanced COPD and pulmonary emphysema. METHODS: We performed a single-center prospective analysis of patients with COPD GOLD III/IV. Metabolic parameters, dietary and exercise behavior, lung function, exercise capacity and body composition by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) were analyzed. Patients with severe emphysema (emphysema index [EI] >20%) were compared to patients with mild emphysema (EI ≤ 20%). RESULTS: A total of 121 patients (45.5% female, mean age 64.8 ± 8.1 years, mean FEV1 31.0 ± 8.6%, mean RV 234.7 ± 50.6%) were analyzed, of whom 14.1% were underweight. Only 5% of the patients substituted protein and only about 1/3 performed regular exercise training. BIA showed an unfavourable body composition: body fat ↑, ECM/BCM-index ↑, phase angle ↓ (5.0 ± 0.9°), cell percentage ↓, FFMI (fat-free mass index) ↓. The 94 patients with severe emphysema (mean EI 36.6 ± 8.5%) had lower body-mass-index (22.8 ± 4.3 vs. 31.1 ± 5.8 kg/m2, p < 0.001), FFMI, body weight and body fat, but did not differ significantly in the quality of body composition (e.g. phase angle). Their lipid and glucose metabolism were even better than in mild emphysema patients. CONCLUSION: The finding of significantly lower BMI but similar body composition and better metabolic status in severe emphysema patients needs further investigation. However, it should not distract from the necessity to implement dietary and exercise recommendations for advanced COPD patients.

Utility of rehabilitation prior to bronchoscopic lung volume reduction: post hoc analysis of the VENT trial.

Background and objective: Rehabilitation programmes are a valuable treatment modality for patients with COPD to increase exercise capacity and quality of life. The utility of pulmonary rehabilitation prior to bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) is unclear. Methods: We performed a post hoc analysis of the Valve for Emphysema Palliation Trial (VENT) trial, the first multicentre randomised trial comparing the safety and efficacy of BLVR. Patients completed a pulmonary rehabilitation programme prior to BLVR over 6-10 weeks and maintained by daily practice, consisting of endurance training, strength training and upper/lower limb exercise. Lung function and exercise parameters (6-min walk distance (6MWD)) were assessed before and after rehabilitation and we tried to identify predictors for pulmonary rehabilitation benefit. Results: Lung function and exercise capacity of 403 patients (mean±sd age 63.3±7.4 years, 37.5% female, mean±sd forced expiratory volume in 1 s 30.1±7.6 L) were analysed. Exercise capacity significantly improved from 331.6±98.8 m to 345.6±95.3 m (p<0.001) in 6-min walk testing (6MWT), with 40.3% showing clinically meaningful improvements. Patients also experienced less dyspnoea after 6MWT, while pulmonary function parameters did not change significantly overall. Patients with lower exercise capacity at screening (6MWD <250 m) benefited more from pulmonary rehabilitation. The indication and prerequisites for BLVR were still present in all patients after pulmonary rehabilitation. Conclusion: The national mandatory requirements for rehabilitation prior to BLVR, which apply to all COPD patients, should be reconsidered and specified for COPD patients who really benefit.

Severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is associated with reduced oral health conditions.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate the association of explicitly severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with oral conditions considering in-depth shared risk factors. METHODS: A case-control study was conducted with 104 participants, 52 with severe COPD and 52 matched controls without COPD. Dental and periodontal status were clinically assessed and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) by OHIP-G14-questionnaire. RESULTS: Between COPD- and control-group, there were no statistically significant differences regarding age (66.02 ± 7.30), sex (female: 52 [50%]), smoking history (44.69 ± 23.23 pack years) and number of systemic diseases (2.60 ± 1.38). COPD patients demonstrated significantly fewer remaining teeth (12.58 ± 9.67 vs. 18.85 ± 6.24, p < 0.001) besides higher DMFT (decayed, missing and filled teeth) index (21.12 ± 5.83 vs. 19.10 ± 3.91, p = 0.036). They had significantly greater probing pocket depths (PPD: 3.24 mm ± 0.71 mm vs. 2.7 mm ± 0.37 mm, p < 0.001) and bleeding on probing (BOP: 34.52% ± 22.03% vs. 22.85% ± 17.94%, p = 0.003) compared to controls, but showed no significant difference in clinical attachment level or staging of periodontitis. The OHIP-G14 sum score was significantly higher in COPD patients (7.40 ± 7.28 vs. 3.63 ± 4.85, p = 0.002). Common risk factors such as educational status, physical activity, dentist visit frequency, oral hygiene regimens and dietary habits were less favourable in patients with COPD. CONCLUSIONS: COPD was significantly associated with higher tooth loss, PPD, BOP and DMFT besides lower OHRQoL.

Endobronchial lung volume reduction with valves reduces exacerbations in severe emphysema patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Exacerbations drive the progression of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Endoscopic lung volume reduction (ELVR) with valves is an established treatment option for patients with severe emphysema. Post-interventional exacerbations are observed in 8-17% of cases. Whether the exacerbation rate changes in the medium term after ELVR, is not known. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective analysis of severe emphysema patients with endobronchial valve implantation. The number of exacerbations before and after ELVR was compared, including lung function parameters, exercise capacity and degree of lung volume reduction. The primary endpoint of the study was the number of exacerbations one year after ELVR compared to one year before ELVR. RESULTS: 129 patients (mean age 64.1 ± 7.7 years, 57% female, mean FEV1 0.8 ± 0.2 l, mean RV 243.4 ± 54.9 %) with ELVR in the years 2016-2019 and complete exacerbation history were analyzed. Patients experienced a mean of 2.5 ± 2.2 moderate and severe exacerbations in the year before ELVR. The number of exacerbations decreased significantly to 1.8 ± 2.2 exacerbations in the first year after ELVR (p = 0.009). The decrease in exacerbation rate was associated with the development of complete lobar atelectasis (r = 0.228. p = 0.009). Accordingly, in 41 patients with complete lobar atelectasis, the decrease in exacerbation rate was higher from 2.8 ± 2.0 to 1.4 ± 1.8 exacerbations (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: ELVR with valves appears promising to reduce the exacerbation rate in COPD patients, especially when the full treatment benefit of complete lobar atelectasis is achieved.

Endobronchial Valve Replacements in Patients with Advanced Emphysema After Endoscopic Lung Volume Reduction.

Purpose: Up to 41% of patients with endobronchial valve implantation need revision bronchoscopies and valve replacements most likely due to valve dysfunction or lack of benefit. So far, no data is available whether valve replacements lead to the desired lobar volume reduction and therapy benefit. Patients and Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis of patients with endobronchial valve implantation and at least one valve replacement. Indications and number of revision bronchoscopies and valve replacements were evaluated. Therapy benefit regarding lung function and exercise capacity as well as development of complete lobar atelectasis was investigated and possible predictors identified. Results: We identified 73 patients with 1-12 revision bronchoscopies and 1-5 valve replacements. The main indication for revision bronchoscopy in this group was lack of therapy benefit (44.2%). Lung function and exercise capacity showed improvements in about one-third of patients even years after the initial implantation. A total of 26% of all patients showed a complete lobar atelectasis at the end of the observation period, 56.2% had developed lung volume reduction. The logistic regression revealed the development of a previous complete lobar atelectasis as predictor for a complete lobar atelectasis at final follow-up. Oral cortisone long-term therapy was also shown as predictive factor. The probability for a final complete lobar atelectasis was 69.2% if a lobar atelectasis had developed before. Conclusion: Valve replacements are more likely to be beneficial in patients who develop a re-aeration of a previous lobar atelectasis following valve implantation. Every decision for revision bronchoscopy must be taken carefully.

Bronchoscopic Measurement of Collateral Ventilation: State of the Art.

Endoscopic lung volume reduction procedure with valves is a well-studied treatment option for advanced lung emphysema to target lung hyperinflation in carefully selected patients with COPD. Before valve implantation, collateral ventilation (CV) of the target lobe needs to be assessed to obtain an optimal treatment effect. The analysis of CV according to current standards occurs via an in vivo assessment with the Chartis®system (PulmonX Inc., Redwood City, CA, USA) and a computed tomography (CT) scan of the thorax with interlobar fissure analysis. The focus of this review is to provide detailed information about the Chartis®procedure and interpretation of Chartis® phenotypes. As a main tool in the assessment of CV and being a safe procedure, the Chartis® assessment should be performed by default to confirm interlobar fissure analysis in most emphysema patients. Based on the obtained results, lung volume reduction therapy options should be discussed in an interdisciplinary emphysema conference.

Obesity and the Lung: What We Know Today.

Obesity is becoming more and more prevalent especially in Western industrial nations. The understanding of adipose tissue as an endocrine organ as well as the detection of adipocytokines - hormones that are secreted from the adipose tissue - gave reason to examine the interactions between adipose tissue and target organs. These efforts have been intensified especially in the context of bariatric surgery as promising weight loss therapy. Interactions between the lung and adipose tissue have rarely been investigated and are not well understood. There are obvious mechanical effects of obesity on lung function explaining the associations between obesity and lung diseases, in particular obesity hypoventilation syndrome, obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, asthma, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The rise in the prevalence of obesity affects the epidemiology of pulmonary diseases as well. The aim of this review is to summarize the current knowledge on interactions, associations, and consequences of obesity and weight loss on lung function and lung diseases. Based on these data, areas for future research are identified.