Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 21
Filter
1.
J Affect Disord ; 351: 293-298, 2024 Apr 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38286230

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Most studies examining the efficacy of ketamine for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) have been conducted in outpatient or mixed inpatient/outpatient settings. Less is known about effectiveness and tolerability of ketamine for psychiatrically hospitalized patients. Efficacy and tolerability data from a naturalistic sample of acute inpatients may help inform institutions considering ketamine therapy for inpatient services. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of inpatients with non-psychotic MDD treated during the initial 3 years of a ketamine infusion program. Treatment effectiveness was defined using change in Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores over five infusions. MDD treatment response was defined by a 50 % reduction of MADRS score, and remission was defined as MADRS score ≤ 10 at any point during the treatment. We also report the frequency of adverse events. RESULTS: 41 patients with MDD were treated and had outcome data. 19 patients (46.5 %) met criteria for response and 15 patients (26.5 %) met criteria for remission during treatment. Four patients (10 %) had adverse psychological or behavioral outcomes. LIMITATIONS: MADRS scales were administered by psychiatrists, psychologists, and trainees in each discipline who did not undergo standardized training in scale administration. Consistent data regarding the race/ethnicity of the patients was not available. CONCLUSION: Twice weekly racemic ketamine infusion is an effective treatment option for patients hospitalized with MDD. Unmonitored or at home ketamine therapy may pose substantial risks.


Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder, Major , Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant , Ketamine , Humans , Depressive Disorder, Major/psychology , Ketamine/adverse effects , Inpatients , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
3.
Psychiatr Serv ; 74(3): 320-323, 2023 03 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36065578

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to determine COVID-19 vaccination rates for individuals with serious mental illness admitted to a large health system in New York State. METHODS: Vaccination rates among 12,714 patients admitted to psychiatric units and to medical and surgical units were compared between April 6, 2021, and September 30, 2021. RESULTS: Only 40% (N=416 of 1,029) of patients admitted to psychiatric services had at least one COVID-19 vaccination, whereas 64.4% (7,523 of 11,685) of patients admitted to medical and surgical services had at least one vaccination. After adjustment for differences in key demographic and clinical characteristics, patients admitted to psychiatric services had a significantly lower likelihood of vaccination during the study period (risk ratio=0.78, 95% confidence interval=0.73-0.85, p<0.001). Black psychiatric patients had the lowest vaccination rate (28%). CONCLUSIONS: Psychiatric patients with acute illness had low COVID-19 vaccination rates. Targeted outreach for COVID-19 vaccination is necessary to reach this population.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/therapeutic use , Inpatients , Hospitalization , New York/epidemiology , Vaccination
4.
Psychiatry Res ; 316: 114746, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35917649

ABSTRACT

The increased transmissibility of the omicron variant of the SARS-CoV-2 virus resulted in a rapid increase in infection among many psychiatric inpatients in our hospital between December 2021 and February 2022. This required our institution to close affected units to new admissions. In response, we implemented a model utilizing universal SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing at the time of admission, the development of "admitting units" where all patients were quarantined for four days followed by repeat PCR testing, and subsequent transition to COVID-19 negative and COVID-19 positive "receiving units" based on the results of the second test. No unit closures occurred following full implementation of the model.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Psychiatry , Humans , Inpatients , SARS-CoV-2
6.
Psychiatry Res ; 302: 114036, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34098157

ABSTRACT

In May of 2020, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Service Administration (SAMSA) issued guidelines for state psychiatric hospitals, recommending that these facilities adopt universal testing for COVID-19 and "three-space" triage protocols for dedicated COVID-19 positive, negative, and quarantine spaces to mitigate the risk of nosocomial infection. The Westchester Behavioral Health Center of New York Presbyterian Hospital (WBHC-NYP) adopted a comprehensive infection control protocol consistent with these recommendations in April, 2020. We reviewed the records of 1,139 patients treated on the inpatient service at WBHC-NYP between March 14th and June 10th, 2020, dates corresponding to the first COVID-19 surge in the New York City metropolitan region. The incidence of detected nosocomial or possible nosocomial infections before and during the implementation of the protocol was 0.096 (16/167), or 0.96 infections per 10 at-risk patients. The incidence of nosocomial or possible nosocomial infections after complete implementation was 0.0110 (2/182), or 1.1 infections per 100 at-risk patients. The difference in incidence between the two time points was statistically significant (p<.0003) and represents a 9-fold decrease.  Our findings support the institutional use of a combined testing and space allocation protocol to mitigate risk of outbreaks in confined settings.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Testing/methods , COVID-19/prevention & control , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Hospitals, Psychiatric , Triage/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19/epidemiology , Child , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Inpatients/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , New York City/epidemiology , Young Adult
7.
Psychiatry Res ; 298: 113833, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33657449

ABSTRACT

Some psychiatric hospitals have instituted mandatory COVID-19 testing for all patients referred for admission. Others have permitted patients to decline testing. Little is known about the rate of COVID-19 infection in acute psychiatric inpatients. Characterizing the proportion of infected patients who have an asymptomatic presentation will help inform policy regarding universal mandatory versus symptom-based or opt-out testing protocols. We determined the COVID-19 infection rate and frequency of asymptomatic presentation in 683 consecutively admitted patients during the surge in the New York City region between April 3rd, 2020 and June 8th, 2020. Among these psychiatric inpatients, there was a 9.8 % overall rate of COVID-19 infection. Of the COVID-19 infected patients, approximately 76.1 % (51/67) either had no COVID-19 symptoms or could not offer reliable history of symptoms at the time of admission. Had they not been identified by testing and triaged to a COVID-19 positive unit, they could have infected others, leading to institutional outbreak. These findings provide justification for psychiatric facilities to maintain universal mandatory testing policies, at least until community infection rates fall and remain at very low levels.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Testing/standards , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , Hospitals, Psychiatric/standards , Mental Disorders/therapy , Patient Admission/standards , Adult , Comorbidity , Female , Humans , Male , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Middle Aged , New York City/epidemiology , Referral and Consultation , Triage/standards
8.
Psychiatry Res ; 291: 113244, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32585435

ABSTRACT

Psychiatric patients are at high risk for contracting COVID-19, and inpatient psychiatric units face substantial risks of institutional outbreaks. Here, the authors describe an algorithm for testing and triage in a large psychiatric facility designed to prevent local COVID-19 transmission. The algorithm is based on expert opinion and clinical experience between March and April of 2020, during which the institution cared for 47 COVID-19 positive psychiatric inpatients. The implementation of the algorithm is designed to mitigate COVID-19 transmission, preserve the safest and least restrictive treatment environment for psychiatric inpatients, and provide a model adaptable to other institutional settings.


Subject(s)
Clinical Laboratory Techniques/methods , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Hospitals, Psychiatric , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Triage , Algorithms , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , COVID-19 Testing , Humans , Inpatients , New York , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2
9.
J Affect Disord ; 259: 164-172, 2019 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31445343

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Not all patients with bipolar depression have suicidal ideation (SI). This study examines some factors that link bipolar depression to SI. METHODS: 482 individuals with bipolar I or II were randomized to either lithium or quetiapine plus adjunctive personalized therapy in a 24 week comparative effectiveness trial. Severity of depression and SI were assessed with the Bipolar Inventory of Symptoms Scale (BISS). We examined potential moderators (age, gender, age of illness onset, bipolar type, comorbid anxiety, substance use, past suicide attempts, childhood abuse and treatment arm) and mediators (severity of anxiety, mania, irritability, impairment in functioning (LIFE-RIFT) and satisfaction and enjoyment of life (Q-LES-Q)) of the effect of depression on SI. Statistical analyses were conducted using generalized estimating equations with repeated measures. RESULTS: Bipolar type and past suicide attempts moderated the effect of depression on SI. Life satisfaction mediated the effect of depression and SI. The relationship between anxiety, depression and SI was complex due to the high level of correlation. Treatment with lithium or quetiapine did not moderate the effect of depression on SI. LIMITATIONS: Suicide assessment was only done using an item on BISS. Patient population was not specifically chosen for high suicide risk. DISCUSSION: Individuals with Bipolar II experienced more SI with lower levels of depression severity. A history of suicide predisposed patients to higher levels of SI given the same severity of depression. Reduced life satisfaction mediates the effect of depression on SI and may be a target for therapeutic interventions.


Subject(s)
Anxiety/epidemiology , Bipolar Disorder/diagnosis , Bipolar Disorder/epidemiology , Suicidal Ideation , Adult , Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Comorbidity , Female , Humans , Lithium/therapeutic use , Male , Personal Satisfaction , Quetiapine Fumarate/therapeutic use , Suicide, Attempted , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
10.
J Affect Disord ; 249: 286-293, 2019 Apr 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30784726

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Low field magnetic stimulation is a potentially rapid-acting treatment for depression with mood-enhancing effects in as little as one 20-min session. The most convincing data for LFMS has come from treating bipolar depression. We examined whether LFMS also has rapid mood-enhancing effects in treatment-resistant major depressive disorder, and whether these effects are dose-dependent. OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that a single 20-min session of LFMS would reduce depressive symptom severity and that the magnitude of this change would be greater after three 20-min sessions than after a single 20-min session. METHODS: In a double-blind randomized controlled trial, 30 participants (age 21-65) with treatment-resistant depression were randomized to three 20-min active or sham LFMS treatments with 48 h between treatments. Response was assessed immediately following LFMS treatment using the 6-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-6), the Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS) and the Visual Analog Scale. RESULTS: Following the 3rd session of LFMS, the effect of LFMS on VAS and HAMD-6 was superior to sham (F (1, 24) = 7.45, p = 0.03, Bonferroni-Holm corrected; F (1, 22) = 6.92, p = 0.03, Bonferroni-Holm corrected, respectively). There were no differences between sham and LFMS following the initial or second session with the effect not becoming significant until after the third session. CONCLUSIONS: Three 20-min LFMS sessions were required for active LFMS to have a mood-enhancing effect for individuals with treatment-resistant depression. As this effect may be transient, future work should address dosing schedules of longer treatment courses as well as biomarker-based targeting of LFMS to optimize patient selection and treatment outcomes.


Subject(s)
Affect , Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant/therapy , Magnetic Field Therapy , Adult , Aged , Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant/psychology , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Magnetic Field Therapy/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Selection , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
11.
Clin Neuropharmacol ; 41(6): 230-231, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30273189

ABSTRACT

Urinary retention is a well-documented adverse effect of antipsychotic medications and is thought to be mediated by anticholinergic, adrenergic, and other neurotransmitter effects. Whereas urinary retention has been reported with typical and some atypical antipsychotics, there have been no reports of urinary retention with the novel antipsychotic cariprazine. We report on a case of urinary retention associated with cariprazine. Possible mechanisms for this adverse effect are discussed.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Piperazines/adverse effects , Urinary Retention/chemically induced , Adult , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Humans , Male , Piperazines/administration & dosage , Piperazines/therapeutic use , Schizophrenia/drug therapy
12.
HEC Forum ; 29(4): 303-311, 2017 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28534181

ABSTRACT

The Patient Self Determination Act (PSDA) of 1991 brought much needed attention to the importance of advance care planning and surrogate decision-making. The purpose of this law is to ensure that a patient's preferences for medical care are recognized and promoted, even if the patient loses decision-making capacity (DMC). In general, patients are presumed to have DMC. A patient's DMC may come under question when distortions in thinking and understanding due to illness, delirium, depression or other psychiatric symptoms are identified or suspected. Physicians and other healthcare professionals working in hospital settings where medical illness is frequently comorbid with depression, adjustment disorders, demoralization and suicidal ideation, can expect to encounter ethical tension when medically sick patients who are also depressed or suicidal request do not resuscitate orders.


Subject(s)
Decision Making , Leukemia, Lymphoid/psychology , Resuscitation Orders/ethics , Thinking , Aged, 80 and over , Communication , Humans , Leukemia, Lymphoid/complications , Male , Patient Self-Determination Act , Resuscitation Orders/legislation & jurisprudence , United States
13.
Bipolar Disord ; 18(3): 307-309, 2016 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27041538

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present case report is to describe a potential interaction between valproic acid and oxcarbazepine that resulted in hepatic injury. METHODS: We report the case of a 46-year-old man with schizoaffective disorder who was cross-titrated from valproic acid to oxcarbazepine because of liver injury. RESULTS: Initiation of oxcarbazepine four days after stopping valproic acid produced a significant elevation in liver enzymes that normalized with oxcarbazepine discontinuation and did not reappear with its reintroduction five days later. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that a longer washout period or another agent should be considered when transitioning from valproic acid to oxcarbazepine.

16.
Ann N Y Acad Sci ; 1345: 1-15, 2015 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26014447

ABSTRACT

Depression presents a wide canvas for considering some approaches, issues, and problems in the study of major categories of mental illness in the context of current behavioral and molecular neurobiology. The study of depression encompasses multiple interactions among psychiatry, neurology, and neuroscience, as well as interactions with a host of other disciplines. This paper considers issues from an American perspective and discusses topics including historical aspects of the ways humanity has struggled with depression; the growth of approaches, and the "wars" in psychiatry in the middle of the 20th century between different ideologies; the development of psychiatry as a behavioral science inclusive of many disciplines; current diagnostic systems such as the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) of the American Psychiatric Association, and the ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioral Disorders of the World Health Organization; the efforts to delineate subtypes of depression; the search for new neurobiological and behavioral targets in the context of the National Institute of Mental Health's Research Domain Criteria framework; and examples of potential future discoveries and disciplines that may ultimately improve treatment.


Subject(s)
Depression , Depression/classification , Depression/diagnosis , Depression/history , Depression/therapy , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , History, 17th Century , History, 18th Century , History, 19th Century , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans , Neurosciences/history , Neurosciences/trends , Psychiatry/history , Psychiatry/trends , United States
17.
Bipolar Disord ; 17(2): 212-23, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25130321

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Individuals with bipolar disorder have high rates of other medical comorbidity, which is associated with higher mortality rates and worse course of illness. The present study examined common predictors of medical comorbidity. METHODS: The Clinical and Health Outcomes Initiative in Comparative Effectiveness for Bipolar Disorder study (Bipolar CHOICE) enrolled 482 participants with bipolar I or bipolar II disorder in a six-month, randomized comparative effectiveness trial. Baseline assessments included current and lifetime DSM-IV-TR diagnoses, demographic information, psychiatric and medical history, severity of psychiatric symptoms, level of functioning, and a fasting blood draw. Medical comorbidities were categorized into two groups: cardiometabolic (e.g., diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and metabolic syndrome) and non-cardiovascular (e.g., seizures, asthma, and cancer). Additionally, we looked at comorbid substance use (e.g., smoking and drug dependence). RESULTS: We found that 96.3% of participants had at least one other medical comorbidity. Older age predicted a greater likelihood of having a cardiometabolic condition. Early age of onset of bipolar symptoms was associated with a lower chance of having a cardiometabolic condition, but a greater chance of having other types of medical comorbidity. Additional predictors of other medical comorbidities in bipolar disorder included more time spent depressed, less time spent manic/hypomanic, and longer duration of illness. Medications associated with weight gain were associated with low high-density lipoprotein and abnormal triglycerides. CONCLUSIONS: There appears to be a substantial medical burden associated with bipolar disorder, highlighting the need for collaborative care among psychiatric and general medical providers to address both psychiatric and other medical needs concomitantly in this group of patients.


Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Hyperlipidemias/epidemiology , Metabolic Syndrome/epidemiology , Smoking/epidemiology , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Adult , Antimanic Agents/therapeutic use , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Asthma/epidemiology , Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Bipolar Disorder/psychology , Comorbidity , Comparative Effectiveness Research , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Female , Humans , Lithium Compounds/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Quetiapine Fumarate/therapeutic use , Seizures/epidemiology
18.
J Clin Psychopharmacol ; 35(1): 68-74, 2015 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25514063

ABSTRACT

Benzodiazepines are widely prescribed for patients with bipolar disorders in clinical practice, but very little is known about the subtypes of patients with bipolar disorder or aspects of bipolar illness that contribute most to benzodiazepine use. We examined the prevalence of and factors associated with benzodiazepine use among 482 patients with bipolar I or II disorder enrolled in the Bipolar CHOICE study. Eighty-one subjects were prescribed benzodiazepines at study entry and were considered benzodiazepine users. Stepwise logistic regression was used to model baseline benzodiazepine use versus nonuse, using entry and exit criteria of P < 0.1. In bivariate analyses, benzodiazepine users were prescribed a significantly higher number of other psychotropic medications and were more likely to be prescribed lamotrigine or antidepressants as compared with benzodiazepine nonusers. Benzodiazepine users were more likely to have a diagnosis of bipolar I disorder and comorbid anxiety disorder, but not comorbid alcohol or substance use disorders. Benzodiazepine users also had experienced more anxiety and depressive symptoms and suicidality, but not irritability or manic symptoms, than did benzodiazepine nonusers. In the multivariate model, anxiety symptom level (regardless of diagnosis), lamotrigine use, number of concomitant psychotropic medications, college education, and high household income predicted benzodiazepine use. Benzodiazepine use in patients with bipolar disorders is associated with greater illness complexity as indicated by a higher number of concomitant psychotropic medications and higher anxiety symptom burden, regardless of a comorbid anxiety disorder diagnosis. Demographic factors were also important determinants of benzodiazepine use, which may be related to access to care and insurance coverage for benzodiazepines.


Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Benzodiazepines/therapeutic use , Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Bipolar Disorder/psychology , Outpatients/psychology , Severity of Illness Index , Adult , Bipolar Disorder/diagnosis , Cohort Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
19.
J Affect Disord ; 161: 30-5, 2014 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24751304

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the longer-term effects of adjunctive benzodiazepines on symptom response during treatment in patients with bipolar disorders. METHODS: The study sample consisted of 482 patients with bipolar I or II disorder enrolled in a 6-month, randomized, multi-site comparison of lithium- and quetiapine-based treatment. Changes in clinical measures (BISS total and subscales, CGI-BP, and CGI-Efficacy Index) were compared between participants who did and did not receive benzodiazepine treatment at baseline or during follow-up. Selected outcomes were also compared between patients who did and did not initiate benzodiazepines during follow-up using stabilized inverse probability weighted analyses. RESULTS: Significant improvement in all outcome measures occurred within each benzodiazepine exposure group. Benzodiazepine users (at baseline or during follow-up) experienced significantly less improvement in BISS total, BISS irritability, and CGI-BP scores than did benzodiazepine non-users. There were no significant differences in these measures between patients who did and did not initiate benzodiazepines during follow-up in the weighted analyses. There was no significant effect of benzodiazepine use on any outcome measure in patients with comorbid anxiety or substance use disorders. LIMITATIONS: This is a secondary analysis of data from a randomized effectiveness trial that was not designed to address differential treatment response according to benzodiazepine use. CONCLUSIONS: Adjunctive benzodiazepines may not significantly affect clinical outcome in lithium- or quetiapine-treated patients with bipolar I or II disorder over 6 months, after controlling for potential confounding factors.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Benzodiazepines/therapeutic use , Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Lithium Compounds/therapeutic use , Adult , Bipolar Disorder/psychology , Dibenzothiazepines/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Quetiapine Fumarate , Treatment Outcome
20.
J Affect Disord ; 151(2): 722-727, 2013 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23993440

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Individuals with bipolar disorder lead a sedentary lifestyle associated with worse course of illness and recurrence of symptoms. Identifying potentially modifiable predictors of exercise frequency could lead to interventions with powerful consequences on the course of illness and overall health. METHODS: The present study examines baseline reports of exercise frequency of bipolar patients in a multi-site comparative effectiveness study of a second generation antipsychotic (quetiapine) versus a classic mood stabilizer (lithium). Demographics, quality of life, functioning, and mood symptoms were assessed. RESULTS: Approximately 40% of participants reported not exercising regularly (at least once per week). Less frequent weekly exercise was associated with higher BMI, more time depressed, more depressive symptoms, and lower quality of life and functioning. In contrast, more frequent exercise was associated with experiencing more mania in the past year and more current manic symptoms. LIMITATIONS: Exercise frequency was measured by self-report and details of the exercise were not collected. Analyses rely on baseline data, allowing only for association analyses. Directionality and predictive validity cannot be determined. Data were collected in the context of a clinical trial and thus, it is possible that the generalizability of the findings could be limited. CONCLUSION: There appears to be a mood-specific relationship between exercise frequency and polarity such that depression is associated with less exercise and mania with more exercise in individuals with bipolar disorder. This suggests that increasing or decreasing exercise could be a targeted intervention for patients with depressive or mood elevation symptoms, respectively.


Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder/diagnosis , Exercise/psychology , Quality of Life , Adult , Affect , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Comparative Effectiveness Research , Dibenzothiazepines/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Lithium Compounds/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Quetiapine Fumarate
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...