Antibiotics versus no therapy in kidney transplant recipients with asymptomatic bacteriuria (BiRT): a pragmatic, multicentre, randomized, controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: Many transplant physicians screen for and treat asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) during post-kidney-transplant surveillance. We investigated whether antibiotics are effective in reducing the occurrence of symptomatic urinary tract infection (UTI) in kidney transplant recipients with ASB. METHODS: We performed this multicentre, randomized, open-label trial in kidney transplant recipients who had ASB and were ≥2 months post-transplantation. We randomly assigned participants to receive antibiotics or no therapy. The primary outcome was the incidence of symptomatic UTI over the subsequent 12 months. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-nine kidney transplant recipients with ASB were randomly assigned to antibiotics (100 participants) or no therapy (99 participants). There was no significant difference in the occurrence of symptomatic UTI between the antibiotic and no-therapy groups (27%, 27/100 versus 31%, 31/99; univariate Cox model: hazard ratio 0.83, 95%CI: 0.50-1.40; log-rank test: p 0.49). Over the 1-year study period, antibiotic use was five times higher in the antibiotic group than in the no-therapy group (30 antibiotic days/participant, interquartile range 20-41, versus 6, interquartile range 0-15, p < 0.001). Overall, 155/199 participants (78%) had at least one further episode of bacteriuria during the follow-up. Compared with the participant's baseline episode of ASB, the second episode of bacteriuria was more frequently caused by bacteria resistant to clinically relevant antibiotics (ciprofloxacin, cotrimoxazole, third-generation cephalosporin) in the antibiotic group than in the no-therapy group (18%, 13/72 versus 4%, 3/83, p 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Applying a screen-and-treat strategy for ASB does not reduce the occurrence of symptomatic UTI in kidney transplant recipients who are more than 2 months post-transplantation. Furthermore, this strategy increases antibiotic use and promotes the emergence of resistant organisms.

Efficacy and Safety of a Tofacitinib-based Immunosuppressive Regimen After Kidney Transplantation: Results From a Long-term Extension Trial.

BACKGROUND: Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor. This open-label, long-term extension (LTE) study (NCT00658359) evaluated long-term tofacitinib treatment in stable kidney transplant recipients (n = 178) posttransplant. METHODS: Patients who completed 12 months of cyclosporine (CsA) or tofacitinib treatment in the phase IIb parent study (NCT00483756) were enrolled into this LTE study, evaluating long-term tofacitinib treatment over months 12 to 72 posttransplant. Patients were analyzed by tofacitinib less-intensive (LI) or more-intensive (MI) regimens received in the parent study. For both groups, tofacitinib dose was reduced from 10 to 5 mg twice daily by 6 months into the LTE. Patients were followed up through month 72 posttransplant, with a focus on month 36 results. RESULTS: Tofacitinib demonstrated similar 36-month patient and graft survival rates to CsA. Biopsy-proven acute rejection rates at month 36 were 11.2% for CsA, versus 10.0% and 7.4% (both P > 0.05) for tofacitinib LI and MI, respectively. Least squares mean estimated glomerular filtration rates were 9 to 15 mL/min per 1.73 m2 higher for tofacitinib versus CsA at month 36. The proportions of patients with grade 2/3 interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy in month 36 protocol biopsies were 20.0% for LI and 18.2% for MI (both P > 0.05) versus 33.3% for CsA. Kaplan-Meier cumulative serious infection rates at month 36 were numerically higher for tofacitinib LI (43.9%; P = 0.45) and significantly higher for MI (55.9%; P < 0.05) versus CsA (37.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term tofacitinib continued to be effective in preventing renal allograft acute rejection and preserving renal function. However, long-term tofacitinib and mycophenolic acid product combination was associated with persistent serious infection risk.

Preemptive reduction of immunosuppression upon high urinary polyomavirus loads improves patient survival without affecting kidney graft function.

BACKGROUND: Polyomavirus (PV) is a major cause of kidney graft disease. Monitoring by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on blood is currently recommended. In order to avoid irreversible lesions, we investigated the clinical impact of preemptive reduction of immunosuppression (IS) in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) upon detection of high urinary PV (Upv) load, including BK virus and JC virus. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From 2000 to 2011, in our single center, 789 consecutive KTR were distributed into 4 groups, according to the maximal Upv levels (by PCR) during the first year and the therapeutic option: (A) Upv <104 copies (cp)/mL (n=573), (B) ≥104 Upv <107 cp/mL (n=100), and (C) Upv ≥107 cp/mL (n=116); in group C, the IS drug doses were reduced in subgroup Ca (n=102) only, as 14 patients (subgroup Cb) were at risk for graft rejection. RESULTS: The preemptive reduction of IS (group Ca) increased patient survival as compared with all other groups (P<.05), did not modify graft function, and increased graft survival vs group A (risk ratio: 5.7, confidence interval: 1.8-18.1, P=.003). Differences for risk factors are as follows (groups Ca vs A): incidence of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) immunization (>5% panel reactive antibodies): 3% vs 8% (P=.05), number of HLA mismatches: 2.7 vs 2.5 (P=.049), and incidence of acute rejection: 9.8% vs 24.2% (P=.005). PV-associated nephropathy occurred only in group Ca (2% of total grafts) without effect on patient or graft outcome. CONCLUSION: The reduction of IS in patients with high Upv loads is beneficial for patient survival and does not affect graft survival or graft function.

Does basiliximab induction trigger lifethreatening ARDS and shock in young patients after kidney transplantation?

BACKGROUND: Kidney disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines strongly recommend administering an anti-IL-2R mAb (i.e., basiliximab) for induction in all kidney transplant recipients. We describe a life-threatening episode of shock following basiliximab injection and review the literature. METHODS AND RESULTS: A 20-year-old male was given tacrolimus, methylprednisolone, mycophenolate, and basiliximab, 20 mg in the context of living-related kidney transplantation. On post-operative Day 1 (POD 1), he developed acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), shock, multiple organ failure, and had a cardiac arrest. After effective resuscitation, he received rescue therapies (NO inhalation, extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation, and CVVHD) but lost the graft as the result of cortical necrosis. We conducted PubMed searches that yielded 7 similar cases; 6 required invasive ventilation. Three patients developed cardiac arrest, 3 required major inotropic support, and 2 developed MOF and myocardial depression. All but 1 patient recovered rapidly within a few days. There was no evidence for infectious, allergic, or over-hydration concerns. Although the direct causal role of basiliximab cannot be formally proven, the fact that ARDS at the time of induction therapy with other immunosuppressive agents is otherwise extremely rare suggests a direct role for basiliximab. CONCLUSIONS: Basiliximab could be associated with shock and ARDS.

A 'silent', new polymorphism of factor H and apparent de novo atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome after kidney transplantation.

The pathophysiology of atypical haemolytic-uraemic syndrome (aHUS) occurring de novo after renal transplantation may include genetic mutations of regulators of complement activation, but they are still rarely determined. A 41-year-old female renal transplant recipient presented two very different episodes of thrombotic microangiopathy. The first episode was associated with antibody-mediated rejection and the second was an isolated, acute aHUS, successfully treated with eculizumab. The diagnosis included a genetic analysis and we found a synonymous variant in the Complement Factor H (CFH) gene, c2634C>T (p.His878=) and low factor H (FH) activity during both events. In conclusion, the diagnosis of aHUS should be considered when TMA is associated with an AMR episode. In this setting, a silent polymorphism of factor H may be responsible for these rare cases of "de novo" aHUS after transplantation.

Large decrease of anti-tetanus anatoxin and anti-pneumococcal antibodies at one year after renal transplantation.

AIMS: In kidney transplant recipients (KTR), antibody (Ab) synthesis is hampered by AZA and CsA. We here report in a prospective cohort study, the effects of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) associated to a calcineurin inhibitor on plasma levels of anti-tetanus anatoxin Ab (TAnAb) and anti-pneumococcal Ab (PnPsAb). METHODS: Serum titers of the TAnAb and the PnPsAb against serotypes 14, 19F and 23F were measured in 94 KTR on Day 0 (T0) and 1 year (T12) after renal transplantation and in 49 healthy controls. RESULTS: 1) At T0, TAnAb were detected in only 71% of patients vs. 98% of controls (p < 0.0001) and the titers were significantly lower in KTR (1.46 UI/ml vs. 2.74 in controls, p = 0.01); they further decreased between T0 and T12 (1.46 UI/ml to 0.31, p < 0.0001). The calculated half-life (t1/2) of TAnAb was 7.7 months, as compared to more than 10 years in a normal population. 2) In KTR, PnPsAb titers decreased significantly between T0 and T12 (p < 0.005); the t1/2 of the different PnPsAb ranged from 9.2 to 11.9 months. CONCLUSIONS: In KTR treated by MMF and CNI, the TAnAbs and PnPsAbs titers decrease significantly and profoundly during the first year. Immunization pre-transplantation should be encouraged to maintain adequate post-transplant Abs levels.

Major histocompatibility complex class 1 chain-related antigen a antibodies: sensitizing events and impact on renal graft outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Major histocompatibility complex class 1 chain-related antigen A (MICA) antibodies (Abs) have been associated with renal graft loss in one large cohort. The triggering factors for MICA Abs and their autologous or allogeneic specificity have not been well defined. More data on the impact of MICA on renal grafts outcome are needed. METHODS: We tested sera from 494 controls and 597 patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) for MICA using Luminex. Forty CKD MICA+ patients were genotyped for MICA alleles to determine their auto- or allospecificity. We compared MICA+ with MICA- renal transplant recipients with regard to acute rejection episodes and long-term survival. RESULTS: Blood transfusions, previous transplantation, and more than two pregnancies were independent risk factors for the presence of MICA Abs, as were CKD stage V status and male gender. Among the 40 genotyped patients, allo-Abs alone were present in 32 patients, both auto- and allo-Abs in 4 patients, and auto-Abs alone in 4 patients. When we compared MICA+ with MICA- patients, the incidence of acute rejection episodes during the first year (10.2% vs. 12.8%), as well as 1-year creatinine and proteinuria, were similar in both groups. At 10 years, actuarial patient (97.8% vs. 87.6%) and overall graft survival (76% vs. 72%) were similar between MICA+ and MICA- patients. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, (1) sensitizing events for MICA Abs are the same as for human leukocyte antigen Abs; (2) MICA Abs did not adversely affect renal graft outcomes in our cohort.

Evolution of immunoglobulin and mannose binding protein levels after renal transplantation: association with infectious complications.

Hypogammaglobulinemia (hypo-Ig) and low mannose binding protein (MBP) levels might be involved in the infectious risk in renal transplantation. In 152 kidney transplant recipients treated with calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), during the first year, we prospectively recorded the incidence of hypogammaglobulinemia, and low MBP levels. Their influence on infectious complications was evaluated in 92 patients at 3 and 12 months (T3 and T12). The proportion of deficiency increased significantly: hypo-IgG: 6% (T0), 45% (T3), and 30% (T12) (P < 0.001); hypo-MBP: 5%, 11%, and 12% (P = 0.035). Hypo-IgG at T3 was not associated with an increased incidence of first-year infections. A significantly higher proportion of patients with combined hypogammaglobulinemia [IgG+ (IgA and/or IgM)] at T3 and with isolated hypo-IgG at T0 developed infections until T3 compared with patients free of these deficits (P < 0.05). Low MBP levels at T3 were associated with more sepsis and viral infections. Hypogammaglobulinemia is frequent during the first year after renal transplantation in patients treated with a CNI and MMF. Hypo-IgG at T0 and combined Igs deficts at T3 were associated with more infections. MBP deficiency might emerge as an important determinant of the post-transplant infectious risk.