Dynamic reconfigurations of brain networks in depressive and anxiety disorders: The influence of antidepressants.

Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and anxiety disorders are highly comorbid recurrent psychiatric disorders. Reduced dynamic reconfiguration of brain regions across subnetworks may play a critical role underlying these deficits, with indications of normalization after treatment with antidepressants. This study investigated dynamic reconfigurations in controls and individuals with a current MDD and/or anxiety disorder including antidepressant users and non-users in a large sample (N = 207) of adults. We quantified the number of subnetworks a region switched to (promiscuity) as well as the total number of switches (flexibility). Average whole-brain (i.e., global) values and subnetwork-specific values were compared between diagnosis and antidepressant groups. No differences in reconfiguration dynamics were found between individuals with a current MDD (N = 49), anxiety disorder (N = 46), comorbid MDD and anxiety disorder (N = 55), or controls (N = 57). Global and sensorimotor network (SMN) promiscuity and flexibility were higher in antidepressant users (N = 49, regardless of diagnosis) compared to non-users (N = 101) and controls. Dynamic reconfigurations were considerably higher in antidepressant users relative to non-users and controls, but not significantly altered in individuals with a MDD and/or anxiety disorder. The increase in antidepressant users was apparent across the whole brain and in the SMN when investigating subnetworks. These findings help disentangle how antidepressants improve symptoms.

Dorsal attention network centrality increases during recovery from acute stress exposure.

Stress is a major risk factor for the development of almost all psychiatric disorders. In addition to the acute stress response, an efficient recovery in the aftermath of stress is important for optimal resilience. Increased stress vulnerability across psychiatric disorders may therefore be related to altered trajectories during the recovery phase following stress. Such recovery trajectories can be quantified by changes in functional brain networks. This study therefore evaluated longitudinal functional network changes related to stress in healthy individuals (N = 80), individuals at risk for psychiatric disorders (healthy siblings of schizophrenia patients) (N = 39), and euthymic bipolar I disorder (BD) patients (N = 36). Network changes were evaluated before and at 20 and 90 min after onset of an experimental acute stress task (Trier Social Stress Test) or a control condition. Whole-brain functional networks were analyzed using eigenvector centrality as a proxy for network importance, centrality change over time was related to the acute stress response and recovery for each group. In healthy individuals, centrality of the dorsal attention network (DAN; p = 0.007) changed over time in relation to stress. More specifically, DAN centrality increased during the recovery phase after acute stress exposure (p = 0.020), while no DAN centrality change was observed during the initial stress response (p = 0.626). Such increasing DAN centrality during stress recovery was also found in healthy siblings (p = 0.016), but not in BD patients (p = 0.554). This study highlights that temporally complex and precise changes in network configuration are vital to understand the response to and recovery from stress.