Seeking-taking chain schedules of cocaine and sucrose self-administration: effects of reward size, reward omission, and α-flupenthixol.

RATIONALE: In heterogeneous seeking-taking (ST) chain schedules of self-administration, seeking rewards and taking rewards are distinct actions, giving animals explicit control over their intake of the reward. However, the neurobehavioral characteristics of ST chain schedules are relatively unexplored. OBJECTIVES: This study was made to evaluate two variants of ST chain schedules of self-administration to measure seeking and taking of sucrose and cocaine in rats. METHODS: Rats had to respond on one lever (seeking lever) under a random interval (RI) or under a progressive ratio (PR) schedule, to gain access to a second lever (taking lever), responding on which under a fixed-ratio 1 (FR-1) schedule of reinforcement delivered the reward. We assessed the effects of reward size, reward omission, and administration of the dopamine receptor antagonist α-flupenthixol. The effects of α-flupenthixol on responding for cocaine or sucrose under an FR-1 schedule of reinforcement were also assessed. RESULTS: Cocaine seeking under both schedules was reduced by decreasing reward size, reward omission, and α-flupenthixol treatment. Cocaine taking was decreased by α-flupenthixol treatment and reward omission, but not by altering reward size. Sucrose seeking was not affected by reward size, but was reduced by α-flupenthixol and reward omission. Sucrose taking was diminished by reward omission only. α-Flupenthixol increased cocaine but not sucrose intake under an FR-1 schedule of reinforcement. CONCLUSIONS: Both ST(PR) and ST(RI) schedules can be used to assess seeking and taking of sucrose and cocaine. Dopaminergic neurotransmission mediates the positive subjective properties of cocaine but not sucrose and the motivational properties of both sucrose and cocaine.

Dissociable roles of mGlu5 and dopamine receptors in the rewarding and sensitizing properties of morphine and cocaine.

RATIONALE: Drugs of abuse are initially used because of their rewarding properties. As a result of repeated drug exposure, sensitization to certain behavioral effects of drugs occurs, which may facilitate the development of addiction. Recent studies have implicated the metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGlu5 receptor) in drug reward, but its role in sensitization is unclear. Stimulation of dopamine receptors plays an important role in drug reward, but not in the sensitizing properties of cocaine and morphine. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the role of mGlu5 and dopamine receptors in the development of cocaine- and morphine-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) and psychomotor sensitization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Rats were treated with the mGlu5 receptor antagonist MTEP (0, 1, 3, and 10 mg/kg, i.p.) or the dopamine receptor antagonist α-flupenthixol (0, 0.125, 0.25, and 0.5 mg/kg, i.p.) during place conditioning with either morphine (3 mg/kg, s.c.) or cocaine (15 mg/kg, i.p.). Furthermore, MTEP (1 mg/kg, i.p.) or α-flupenthixol (0.5 mg/kg, i.p.) was co-administered during cocaine (30 mg/kg, i.p.) or morphine (3.0 mg/kg, s.c.) pretreatment and psychomotor sensitization was tested 3 weeks post-treatment. RESULTS: MTEP attenuated the development of morphine- but not cocaine-induced CPP. In contrast, MTEP suppressed the development of cocaine- but not morphine-induced psychomotor sensitization. α-Flupenthixol blocked the development of both cocaine- and morphine-induced CPP but did not affect the development of sensitization to either drug. CONCLUSION: Dopamine receptor stimulation mediates cocaine and morphine reward but not sensitization. In contrast, the role of mGlu5 receptors in reward and sensitization is drug-specific.

Vagal activation in novelty-induced tachycardia during the light phase in the rat.

The effects of repeated exposure to a novel test box on cardiac and behavioral activities (locomotion, rearing, grooming, scanning, and immobility) were studied in rats tested during the dark phase ("dark" rats) or the light phase ("light" rats) of the lighting cycle, using a telemetry system for registration of ECGs during the first and fifth tests. Heart rate (HR) was used to monitor sympathetic and parasympathetic activity; the PQ interval was used to monitor parasympathetic activity. Behavior was videotaped simultaneously. In light rats, the first and fifth exposures to the test box resulted in higher increases of active behavior and HR than in dark rats, whereas the duration of the PQ interval of the ECG was increased in light rats only. This indicates that in the light phase novelty induces active behavior associated with an increase in both sympathetic and vagal outflow, whereas in the dark phase behavioral activation is predominantly associated with increased sympathetic activity, without appreciable changes in vagal outflow. In addition, light rats showed less active behavior during the fifth than during the first exposure, indicating behavioral habituation. This behavioral habituation to the test box in the light phase coincided with vagal habituation (a diminution of the PQ interval). The increase of the tachycardiac response during the fifth exposure as compared to the first exposure suggests that it is not likely that sympathetic outflow was part of the habituation process. In dark rats no behavioral or cardiac habituation was found.

Effect of SCH 23390 and quinpirole on novelty-induced grooming behaviour in spontaneously hypertensive rats and Wistar-Kyoto rats.

Grooming behaviour induced by exposure to a novel environment was studied in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) and normotensive Wistar-Kyoto rats (WKY). The dopamine D1 receptor antagonist, SCH 23390, and the dopamine D2 receptor agonist, quinpirole, were used to study brain dopamine systems in these rat strains, via their effects on grooming behaviour. The total grooming behaviour displayed in a 50-min observation period was significantly lower in SHR than in WKY. Except for the paw licking component no differences between the two strains were observed in the separate behavioural elements of grooming behaviour. SCH 23390 and quinpirole were found to suppress novelty-induced grooming behaviour of both strains. In SHR, grooming behaviour was less suppressed by SCH 23390, whereas the suppression by quinpirole was more pronounced than in WKY. These results indicate that there are alterations in central dopamine systems in SHR, probably involving changes both in dopamine D1 and D2 receptor mechanisms in the brain.