Common practices in patient care after mammaplasty and perioperative safety measures to prevent thromboembolic events - An observational study across all continents.

BACKGROUND: Most plastic surgeons have encountered complications related to venous thromboembolism in their profession. However, considerable deficits in risk assessment and prophylaxis have been described. As outpatient procedures are increasing, so are concerns with regard to patient safety. The presented study investigates the global distribution pattern of patient care for mammaplasties and compares international common practices of perioperative safety measures to prevent thromboembolic events. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to over 5000 plastic surgeons in 77 countries. The survey inquired about surgeon demographics, standard perioperative safety measures, type of thrombosis prophylaxis, and international patterns of patient care. The results were evaluated and correlated with the evidence-based literature. RESULTS: A total of 1431 surveys were gathered (response rate: 29%). The gathered data show international disparity with regard to inpatient vs. outpatient care. Mammaplasties in the USA are being performed as same-day surgeries in > 80% of cases, while globally inpatient and outpatient procedures are distributed evenly. Also, we found no international consensus with regard to safety measures to prevent thromboembolic events. Geographical regions showed differences with regard to type, dosage, timing, and duration of thrombosis prophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: International practice patterns remain incoherent. This highlights the need for coherent and detailed global guidelines for plastic surgical interventions. High-quality studies are needed in order to establish evidence-based, standardized, and universally applicable practice guidelines.

Uni-vs. bilateral DIEP flap reconstruction - A multicenter outcome analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Over the past decade numbers of bilateral mastectomy have increased steadily. As a result, bilateral breast reconstruction is gaining popularity. The presented study compares complications and outcomes of unilateral and bilateral DIEP free-flap breast reconstructions using the largest database available in Europe. METHODS: Female breast cancer patients (n = 3926) receiving DIEP flap breast reconstructions (n = 4577 free flaps) at 22 different centers were included in this study. Free flaps were stratified into two groups: a unilateral- (UL) and a bilateral- (BL) breast reconstruction group. Groups were compared with regard to surgical complications and free flap outcome. RESULTS: Mean operative time was significantly longer in the BL group (UL: 285.2 ± 107.7 vs. BL: 399.1 ± 136.8 min; p < 0.001). Mean ischemia time was comparable between groups (p = 0.741). There was no significant difference with regard to total (UL 1.8% vs. BL 2.6%, p = 0.081) or partial flap loss (UL 1.2% vs. BL 0.9%, p = 0.45) between both groups. Rates of venous or arterial thrombosis were comparable between both groups (venous: UL 2.9% vs. BL 2.2%, p = 0.189; arterial: UL 1.8% vs. BL 1.2%, p = 0.182). However, significantly higher rates of hematoma at the donor and recipient site were observed in the UL group (donor site: UL 1.1% vs. BL 0.1%, p = 0.001; recipient site UL 3.9% vs. BL 1.7%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The data underline the feasibility of bilateral DIEP flap reconstruction, when performed in a setting of specialized centers.

Immediate versus secondary DIEP flap breast reconstruction: a multicenter outcome study.

PURPOSE: Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) at the time of mastectomy is gaining popularity, as studies show no negative impact on recurrence or patient survival, but better aesthetic outcome, less psychological distress and lower treatment costs. Using the largest database available in Europe, the presented study compared outcomes and complications of IBR vs. delayed breast reconstruction (DBR). METHODS: 3926 female patients underwent 4577 free DIEP-flap breast reconstructions after malignancies in 22 different German breast cancer centers. The cases were divided into two groups according to the time of reconstruction: an IBR and a DBR group. Surgical complications were accounted for and the groups were then compared. RESULTS: Overall, the rate of partial-(1.0 versus 1.2 percent of cases; p = 0.706) and total flap loss (2.3 versus 1.9 percent of cases; p = 0.516) showed no significant difference between the groups. The rate of revision surgery was slightly, but significantly lower in the IBR group (7.7 versus 9.8 percent; p = 0.039). Postoperative mobilization was commenced significantly earlier in the IBR group (mobilization on postoperative day 1: 82.1 versus 68.7 percent; p < 0.001), and concordantly the mean length of hospital stay was significantly shorter (7.3 (SD3.7) versus 8.9 (SD13.0) days; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: IBR is feasible and cannot be considered a risk factor for complications or flap outcome. Our results support the current trend towards an increasing number of IBR. Especially in times of economic pressure in health care, the importance of a decrease of hospitalization cannot be overemphasized.

[A critical analysis of perception of plastic surgery in Germany]. / Kritische Perzeptionsanalyse der plastischen Chirurgie in Deutschland.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Plastic surgery includes a broad range of activities; however, there are no studies available in Germany which evaluated the specific role plastic surgeons play in providing patient care. The aim of the project was thus to analyze the public and professional perception of plastic surgery in Germany and to what degree the range of activities is appropriately represented. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An anonymous survey inquiring about demographic data and specific knowledge regarding plastic surgery procedures was conducted in various regions in German. Furthermore, factors that potentially influence the state of knowledge and personal perception were collated. The questionnaire was distributed among healthcare professionals and patients in plastic surgery. The statistical evaluation was performed using SPSS software. RESULTS: A total of 2100 people participated in the nationwide survey. While classical aesthetic operations were mostly assigned to plastic surgery, there was no uniformity as to whether other indications, such as reconstructive interventions and hand surgery were assigned to this specialty or not. In this context various factors could be elucidated, such as the place of residence, education and age of the survey participants and the respective knowledge, which influence the perception. CONCLUSION: Plastic surgery in Germany classically consists of the four pillars of general reconstruction, hand surgery, burn management and aesthetic procedures; however, the results of this survey revealed that plastic surgery in Germany is predominantly understood as burn management and aesthetic surgery. As a multidisciplinary specialty, plastic surgery could apparently benefit from a more positive lobby and from a better portrayal of its scope in the media and general public.

Impact of intraoperative use of vasopressors in lower extremity reconstruction: Single centre analysis of 437 free gracilis muscle and fasciocutaneous anterolateral thigh flaps.

BACKGROUND: While complication rates in free tissue transfers have continuously decreased over time due to improved techniques, the intraoperative use of vasopressors and their negative effects on flap microcirculation and patency of the anastomoses remains controversial. To further elucidate this matter, this retrospective study examines the effect of intraoperative vasopressors on free gracilis muscle and free fasciocutaneous anterolateral thigh (ALT) flaps for lower extremity reconstruction. METHODS: A total of 425 patients underwent 437 free flaps for lower limb reconstruction. The series was divided into two groups: use of intraoperative vasopressors (V, n = 318) or no use (NV, n = 119). The data were retrospectively screened for patients' demographics, perioperative details, and surgical complications. RESULTS: The two groups were comparable regarding patient comorbidities. Independently of flap type, there were no significant difference between the groups regarding major complications, i.e. total flap loss (V: 5.35% versus NV: 5.04%, p = 0.899) or revision rate (V: 18.87% versus NV: 12.61%; p = 0.122), or minor complications, i.e. partial flap loss (V: 6.29% versus NV: 5.88%, p = 0.875). CONCLUSION: This study confirms that the usage of intraoperative vasopressors has no influence on free flap survival rate in lower extremity reconstruction. It seems to be no difference between free muscle or fasciocutaneous flaps.

Beard reconstruction: A surgical algorithm.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Facial defects with loss of hair-bearing regions can be caused by trauma, infection, tumor excision, or burn injury. The presented analysis evaluates a series of different surgical approaches with a focus on male beard reconstruction, emphasizing the role of tissue expansion of regional and free flaps. METHODS: Locoregional and free flap reconstructions were performed in 11 male patients with 14 facial defects affecting the hair-bearing bucco-mandibular or perioral region. In order to minimize donor-site morbidity and obtain large amounts of thin, pliable, hair-bearing tissue, pre-expansion was performed in five of 14 patients. Eight of 14 patients were treated with locoregional flap reconstructions and six with free flap reconstructions. Algorithms regarding pre- and intraoperative decision making are discussed and long-term (mean follow-up 1.5 years) results analyzed. RESULTS: Major complications, including tissue expander infection with the need for removal or exchange, partial or full flap loss, occurred in 0% (0/8) of patients with locoregional flaps and in 17% (1/6) of patients undergoing free flap reconstructions. Secondary refinement surgery was performed in 25% (2/8) of locoregional flaps and in 67% (4/6) of free flaps. CONCLUSION: Both locoregional and distant tissue transfers play a role in beard reconstruction, while pre-expansion remains an invaluable tool. Paying attention to the presented principles and considering the significance of aesthetic facial subunits, range of motion, aesthetics, and patient satisfaction were improved long term in all our patients while minimizing donor-site morbidity.

Outcomes of denervation, joint lavage and capsular imbrication for painful thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis.

Pain reduction remains the main aim in the treatment of thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis. We performed a retrospective analysis of a case series of patients with symptomatic thumb carpometacarpal joint arthritis treated with denervation, joint lavage and capsular imbrication. A total of 60 patients participated in this study. Follow-up, including a clinical examination, was performed on 37 patients at a mean of 46 months (range 12 to 81); an additional 23 patients were followed-up by telephone at a mean of 52 months (range 14 to 93) post-operatively. The patients assessed in person showed a significant decrease in pain and a significant improvement in thumb function. The information gathered by telephone gave similar results. The findings of our study indicate that the presented treatment approach could be a good alternative to more invasive surgical options in patients with earlier stages of thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis. Advantages include the low rate of complications and invasiveness, as well as short recovery times. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Desmoplastic melanoma: a 12-year experience with sentinel lymph node biopsy.

AIMS: Given the paucity of data regarding nodal involvement in desmoplastic melanoma (DM), we decided to review the incidence of nodal metastasis in our patients with DM to better define guidelines regarding the performance of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in this specific melanoma subtype. METHODS: Using a prospectively maintained database, we reviewed all patients who underwent treatment for melanoma at the Yale Melanoma Unit in a twelve-year period (1998-2010), during which 3531 cases were treated. We identified 24 patients (0.7%) diagnosed with DM. These patients' records were studied for clinical and histologic parameters and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients from the DM group had SLNB, of which four (18%) were diagnosed with micro-metastasis. These four patients were all treated with completion lymphadenectomy and none had additional positive nodes in the remainder of the nodes. Patients were followed after surgery for a median of 25 months (range 2-60 months). Two patients (9%) developed local recurrence, two (9%) in-transit recurrence, and six (27%) showed distant metastases (three patients were pure DM and three patients showed mixed morphology). Patients with mixed DM had a higher rate of nodal metastasis (25%) vs those with pure DM (14%). CONCLUSIONS: Other authors have reported that patients diagnosed with pure DM were less likely to have a positive SLN (0-2%) than those patients with the mixed DM subtype (12-16%). Our findings of higher incidence rates of regional lymph node metastases in both the pure and mixed DM subtypes (14% and 25%) compel us to continue to still recommend that SLNB be considered in patients with both subcategories, pure and mixed DM. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.