Thoracic and Lumbar Spine Injury: Evidence-Based Diagnosis, Management, and Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic thoracolumbar spine injuries are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Targeted for non-spine specialist trauma surgeons, this systematic scoping review aimed to examine literature for up-to-date evidence on presentation, management, and outcomes of thoracolumbar spine injuries in adult trauma patients. METHODS: This review was reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist. We searched four bibliographic databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Eligible studies included experimental, observational, and evidence-synthesis articles evaluating patients with thoracic, lumbar, or thoracolumbar spine injury, published in English between January 1, 2010 and January 31, 2021. Studies which focused on animals, cadavers, cohorts with N <30, and pediatric cohorts (age <18 years old), as well as case studies, abstracts, and commentaries were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 2501 studies were screened, of which 326 unique studies were fully text reviewed and twelve aspects of injury management were identified and discussed: injury patterns, determination of injury status and imaging options, considerations in management, and patient quality of life. We found: (1) imaging is a necessary diagnostic tool, (2) no consensus exists for preferred injury characterization scoring systems, (3) operative management should be considered for unstable fractures, decompression, and deformity, and (4) certain patients experience significant burden following injury. DISCUSSION: In this systematic scoping review, we present the most up-to-date information regarding the management of traumatic thoracolumbar spine injuries. This allows non-specialist trauma surgeons to become more familiar with thoracolumbar spine injuries in trauma patients and provides a framework for their management.

Association Between Cervical Cancer Screening Guidelines and Preterm Delivery Among Females Aged 18 to 24 Years.

Importance: Cervical cancer screening is associated with reduced cervical cancer mortality; however, clinical trials have also shown an association between excisional procedures for cervical neoplasia and an increased risk of preterm delivery (PTD). National screening guidelines must weigh adverse effects on birth outcomes against benefits of cancer prevention. Objective: To ascertain the population-level association between the number of guideline-recommended cervical cancer screenings and downstream PTD risk among females aged 18 to 24 years. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used a difference-in-differences approach based on variation in the recommended number of cervical cancer screenings (over time and across individuals giving birth at different ages) to estimate the association between the cumulative recommended number of screenings (by the time of childbirth) and PTD risk. National Vital Statistics System data from females aged 18 to 24 years who had a singleton, nulliparous birth in the US between 1996 and 2018 were used. Regression models were adjusted for maternal educational level, race and ethnicity, comorbidities, marital status, and prenatal care visits. Data were analyzed between June 2020 and March 2023. Exposure: A constructed variable capturing the cumulative number of guideline-recommended cervical cancer screenings for an individual based on their age and year of childbirth. Main Outcomes and Measures: Binary indicators for PTD and very preterm delivery (VPTD), defined as delivery before 37 and 34 weeks' gestational age, respectively, and gestational age was measured in weeks from the first day of the last menstrual period. Results: Among 11 333 151 females aged 18 to 24 years who gave birth between 1996 and 2018, 2 069 713 were Black (18.3%), 2 601 225 were Hispanic (23.0%), 6 068 498 were White (53.5%) individuals, and 593 715 (5.2%) were individuals of other race or ethnicity (Alaska Native; American Indian; Asian; Pacific Islander; multiracial; or unknown or missing race or ethnicity). Mean (SD) age was 20.9 (1.9) years, and 766 001 individuals (6.8%) had hypertension or diabetes. The mean (SD) number of guideline-recommended screenings by time of childbirth was 2.4 (2.2). Overall, PTD and VPTD occurred in 1 140 490 individuals (10.1%) and 333 040 (2.9%) of births, respectively. One additional recommended screening was associated with a 0.073 (95% CI, 0.026-0.120) percentage-point increase in PTD risk but no statistically significant change in VPTD risk. Females with hypertension or diabetes had a higher increase in PTD risk than those without these comorbidities (0.26 [95% CI, 0.11-0.4] vs 0.06 [95% CI, 0.01-0.10] percentage points; Wald test P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: Findings of this cross-sectional study suggest that additional recommended cervical cancer screenings before birth were associated with an increased risk of PTD. These results can be used in future simulation models integrating oncological trade-offs to help ascertain optimal screening strategies.

Implementation and evaluation of an elective quality improvement curriculum for preclinical students: a prospective controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Quality improvement (QI) is a systematic approach to improving healthcare delivery with applications across all fields of medicine. However, exposure to QI is minimal in early medical education. We evaluated the effectiveness of an elective QI curriculum in teaching preclinical health professional students foundational QI concepts. METHODS: This prospective controlled cohort study was conducted at a single academic institution. The elective QI curriculum consisted of web-based video didactics and exercises, supplemented with in-person classroom discussions. An optional hospital-based QI project was offered. Assessments included pre- and post-intervention surveys evaluating QI skills and beliefs and attitudes, quizzes, and Quality Improvement Knowledge Application Tool-Revised (QIKAT-R) cases. Within-group pre-post and between-group comparisons were performed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Overall, 57 preclinical medical or physician assistant students participated under the QI curriculum group (N = 27) or control group (N = 30). Twenty-three (85%) curriculum students completed a QI project. Mean quiz scores were significantly improved in the curriculum group from pre- to post-assessment (Quiz 1: 2.0, P < 0.001; Quiz 2: 1.7, P = 0.002), and the mean differences significantly differed from those in the control group (Quiz 1: P < 0.001; Quiz 2: P = 0.010). QIKAT-R scores also significantly differed among the curriculum group versus controls (P = 0.012). In the curriculum group, students had improvements in their confidence with all 10 QI skills assessed, including 8 that were significantly improved from pre- to post-assessment, and 4 with significant between-group differences compared with controls. Students in both groups agreed that their medical education would be incomplete without a QI component and that they are likely to be involved in QI projects throughout their medical training and practice. CONCLUSIONS: The elective QI curriculum was effective in guiding preclinical students to develop their QI knowledge base and skillset. Preclinical students value QI as an integral component of their medical training. Future directions involve evaluating the impact of this curriculum on clinical clerkship performance and across other academic institutions.