Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Aesthet Surg J ; 36(4): 459-68, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26530478

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The duration to close an incision is an important consideration in plastic surgery. The placement of Insorb absorbable subcuticular staples (Insorb, Incisive Surgical, Plymouth, MN) may allow for a decreased closure time compared with other modalities. OBJECTIVES: The authors evaluated the utility of Insorb staples for the closure of mammaplasty and abdominoplasty incisions. METHODS: Sixty patients who underwent anterior abdominal dermatolipectomy, total circular abdominal dermatolipectomy, bilateral breast reduction, or bilateral mastopexy were evaluated in a prospective study. Dermal closure was achieved on 1 side of each patient with Insorb absorbable staples and on the other with absorbable monofilament sutures. Scar quality, pruritus, and pain were scored according to a modified Vancouver Scar Scale (mVSS) at 1, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Closure with absorbable staples was approximately 7-fold faster than closure with absorbable sutures for all surgical procedures. No significant differences in mVSS scores were noted between incisions closed with staples vs sutures. CONCLUSIONS: Absorbable staples enable faster closure of a surgical incision without compromising scar quality or patient comfort. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Therapeutic.


Subject(s)
Abdominoplasty , Absorbable Implants , Mammaplasty , Surgical Stapling/instrumentation , Sutures , Abdominoplasty/adverse effects , Adult , Cicatrix/etiology , Female , Humans , Male , Mammaplasty/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Operative Time , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Prospective Studies , Surgical Stapling/adverse effects , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Wound Healing , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...